Not long ago, Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga announced his intention to step down as president of the Liberal Democratic Party, causing a sensation in Japanese political circles. Whether for physical reasons or helplessness over internal and external troubles, Suga will resign as prime minister at the end of September or early October, raising concerns about Japan's next prime minister.
* Another day, running for the post of Prime Minister of Japan.
Japan's political circles are eager to take over Suga's premiership. However, the two most likely candidates to emerge are former Foreign Minister Fumio Tagishi and Minister in Charge of Administrative Reform Taro Kono. In this fierce competition, Japan's domestic political circles are about to usher in a historic change.
"Hawks" showdown: Fumio Kishida vs. Taro Kono.
In this election of the prime minister, what attracts attention are two obvious "hawkish" representatives, Fumio Tagishi and Taro Kono. The two have attracted much attention in Japanese political circles and are known for their staunch "anti-China" stance. This election campaign will determine the future direction of Japan's policy and will also have a far-reaching impact on Sino-Japanese relations.
Fumio Tagishi: He has a deep family background and adheres to the "China threat theory".
Fumio Tagishi was born in a family, his father and grandfather were members of the Japanese House of Representatives, and his family was deeply affected by "anti-China" sentiments. Growing up, he has always had a negative view of China. Under the influence of his father, Fumio Tagishi has always advocated the "China threat theory" and believes that solving the China problem is the key to Japan's development. He not only incited hostility toward China, but also actively intervened in Taiwan's affairs, stating that he would deepen cooperation with Taiwan.
Fumio Tagishi's "tough" remarks have raised concerns.
Recently, Fumio Tagishi has made a series of "tough" statements, especially extreme views on China's missiles. He said that Japan needs to have the ability to strike at enemy missile bases, stressing that it must strike before the enemy makes a move. This position has caused a lot of controversy, and it is difficult to understand the bias of the "quasi-prime minister".
Politically correct "anti-China" position.
Fumio Tagishi's remarks have been hotly hyped in Japan, and high hopes have been pinned, and it seems that he has been regarded as a popular candidate for the next new president of the Liberal Democratic Party. He skillfully used his hard-line stance to canvass for his own campaign, satisfying the needs of the domestic public for "anti-China" sentiment and paving the way for US support.
The missile argument has sparked controversy.
Fumio Tagishi's missile argument has attracted widespread attention. He advocated that Japan should have the capability to strike at enemy missile bases in order to ensure the safety of people's lives. This kind of attack is the best defense, which is consistent with his "anti-China" stance in the past. His remarks not only reflect an extreme hardline, but also raise concerns about Japan's future.
The controversy over Japan's "offensive missiles".
In addition, Fumio Tagishi once again raised the issue of developing "offensive missiles" in an attempt to arouse the attention and support of domestic "hawks" bigwigs. However, this proposal is in direct contradiction to Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution, which states that national defense forces should fall under a purely defensive policy. Japan's development of "offensive missiles" is not only illegal, but also runs counter to the international system.
The historical position of Japan as ineligible to "attack".
Looking back at World War II, Japan, as a member of the Axis powers, was on the same page as fascist militarism. After the war, Japan was forced to accept the fate of the "castration" of the army and developed the "National Defense Self-Defense Forces" limited to defense. Japan has been given a special historical position in the international arena and has no right to develop offensive military forces.
The desire to challenge the post-war system.
However, Japan has been trying to break through this limit. During the administration of Shinzo, there was a heated debate about whether to amend the constitution to give it offensive military force. This time, Fumio Tagishi once again mentioned the development of "offensive missiles," indicating Japan's desire to challenge the postwar system.
Epilogue. Fumio Tagishi's remarks and proposals have aroused concern in the international community, especially in the context of the escalation of the confrontation between China and the United States. His stance not only challenges the rules of the international system, but also brings new variables to Sino-Japanese relations. With the Japanese prime minister election approaching, the world will pay attention to Japan's political trend, and this battle for the best people will also determine the future direction of Japan.
Title: Fumio Tagishi's "tough" remarks have sparked international concern, and Sino-Japanese relations may welcome new changes.
Recently, the battle for the first person of the Japanese Prime Minister has become more and more intense, among which Fumio Tagishi has attracted widespread attention because of his "tough" remarks. His stance has been praised at home, but it has raised a lot of concerns internationally, especially when it comes to missiles against China. This series of moves may bring new changes to Sino-Japanese relations.
Fumio Tagishi's "anti-China" stance, derived from his family background and personal experience, has become a major feature of his political career. However, his recent remarks on the missile issue have aroused the concern of the international community. The hard-line military stance of advocating the development of "offensive missiles" and attacking enemy missile bases violates the provisions of Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution to a certain extent and also challenges the principle of peace in the international system.
Amid the international community's concern about Fumio Tagishi's remarks, we cannot ignore the role played by China-Japan relations in this. Fumio Tagishi's hardline attitude could lead to new challenges in Sino-Japanese relations. His remarks not only deepened the contradictions between China and Japan, but also further complicated the regional security situation to a certain extent. China has long advocated peaceful development, but such strong rhetoric could deepen mistrust and bring cooperation between the two countries to an impasse.
In addition, Fumio Tagishi's missile rhetoric appears to be pandering to "hawkish" sentiment at home, trying to win voter support by taking a tough stance on China. However, such short-sighted behavior may lead to misleading foreign policy decisions and overly aggressive expectations among the domestic public. In the long run, this will be detrimental to Japan's international image and status.
On the other hand, Fumio Tagishi's remarks also reflect Japan's desire to be more active in international affairs. Due to the policy orientation of the Shinzo period, Japan has been trying to break free from the shackles of the post-war system and improve its position in international affairs. However, such an attempt to raise Japan's international status through a tough stance may not only cause unease among neighboring countries, but may also backfire and deepen the international community's negative perception of Japan.
Overall, although Fumio Tagishi's remarks have sparked a certain resonance at home, they have caused many concerns internationally. As a result, China-Japan relations may usher in new changes, which pose a potential threat to regional peace and stability. We hope that Japan will carefully weigh its international relations in choosing its new prime minister, refrain from going its own way, and allow countries in the region to coexist peacefully and promote common prosperity.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!