Introduction.
Augustus began the history of the Roman Empire after establishing a unique dominance in Rome. We'll delve into the intricacies of the relationship between the throne and the military, revealing the power game behind the Augustan era. According to the prevailing view in academic circles, the age of Augustus refers to the period of 27-14 BC.
Augustus: The Empire Builder.
As the "founding" emperor, Augustus passed the throne to the heir of his choice, but this did not create a history of normal succession of thrones. In fact, Augustus skillfully established a special kind of imperial system through a covert technique, creating space for the military to intervene in the succession of the imperial throne.
The space of the Führer.
The Führer created by Augustus was a monarchy supported by the army, and military victories became its foundation. Roman law did not explicitly stipulate the succession of the imperial throne, and although the emperor was nominally the supreme commander of the army, the law did not explicitly stipulate his power to control the army, leaving room for the succession of the imperial throne. The Führer system provided the conditions for the military to intervene in politics, making it play an increasingly important role in the succession of the imperial throne.
Decisions and choices of the military.
Throughout the history of the empire, the succession to the throne has been diverse, including matrilineal and patrilineal kinship, adoption, and military involvement. The decisions and choices of the army in the succession of the throne make the inheritance random, abrupt, complex, and difficult. After Augustus established the Führer, the military became a key factor in the succession of the imperial throne, determining the rise and fall of successive rulers.
The head of state and the kingship.
Although Augustus established the Führer, formally consistent with the republic, in practice it was a kind of **kingship. Augustus' centralization of power weakened the Senate, and its role in the succession of the throne was dictated by the military. The peculiarities of the head of state and the Romans' attachment to the republic led to the introduction of a form of government that provided an opportunity for the military to intervene in politics.
The historical pattern of military involvement.
In the history of the empire, the army participated in political life and repeatedly chose the emperor according to its likes and dislikes, which gradually weakened the status of the senate. The strong position of the military in the political situation made the succession process of the imperial throne a variety of opportunities, and the Senate was in a weak position between the army and the emperor. The intervention of the military has made the succession of the imperial throne irregular, and it has become an inevitable trend that the decision power belongs to the army.
Deficiencies in surveillance under the Führer.
Under the Führer, the emperor's control of the army mainly relied on the ability of individuals to rule, and there was a lack of a monitoring system for the army. The coercive power of the military made it difficult for the emperor to achieve effective control, leading the army to frequently interfere in the succession of the imperial throne under the Führer, and even staged a coup d'état to seize the throne.
Conclusion. The Führer system created by Augustus did not solve the institutional problem of imperial succession and did not establish an unshakable position of imperial power in the political structure. The involvement of the military made the succession of the imperial throne complex and diverse, and became a prominent feature of the history of the empire. The flaws of the Führer and the over-reliance on the military eventually led to the decline of the empire, setting the stage for later political evolution.
In this article, the author profoundly and comprehensively examines the intricate relationship between the succession of the imperial throne and the military in the Roman Empire during the Augustan era, and the profound impact of the intervention of the military under the Führer on the succession of the imperial throne. Through the analysis of historical events and political institutions, the article reveals the unique power structure and the complexity of the imperial succession in Roman society at that time.
First, the article reviews the reign of Augustus, pointing out that in the process of establishing the Führer, he skillfully created space for the military to intervene in the succession of the imperial throne. This raised concerns about the shortcomings of Roman law in the succession of the imperial throne and the special position of the military in the senate. Through the analysis of legal texts and power structures, the author digs deep into the reasons for the formation of the Führer system in the early days of the establishment of the empire, and lays the foundation for the discussion that follows.
Secondly, the article focuses on the historical pattern of the army's involvement in the inheritance of the imperial throne under the Führer system. Through detailed historical examples and descriptions of power struggles, the article vividly illustrates the importance of the military in Roman political life. In particular, the decision and choice of the military in the inheritance of the imperial throne were emphasized, which made the inheritance process random, abrupt, complex and diverse, which fully reflected the chaotic state of politics at that time.
The article also provides an in-depth analysis of the peculiarities of the senate and the Romans' attachment to the republic. Through the relationship between the senate and the royal power and the role of the Senate in it, the emotional identification of the Romans with the republic and the disputes over the distribution of power in the early days of the empire are revealed. This section makes the article richer and more three-dimensional, providing readers with a more comprehensive historical background.
Finally, the discussion of the shortcomings of surveillance under the senate and the summary of the conclusions show the author's unique insight into the Roman political system of the period. The article pointed out that the Führer system failed to solve the institutional problem of imperial succession, and the excessive involvement of the military led to political turmoil, which eventually laid the groundwork for the decline of the empire. This conclusion not only provides a profound reflection on historical events, but also provides readers with in-depth reflections on the struggle for power and the evolution of political systems.
Overall, this article provides an in-depth study of the political landscape of the Roman Empire during the time of Augustus, giving readers a better understanding of the complexities of Roman society at that time through the dissection of historical events and power structures. The author's arguments are clear and his arguments are clear, presenting readers with a rich and profound historical picture.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!