In the case of 3 non-biological children after 16 years of marriage, the man has always been supported by **, but the woman has never shown up. However, the woman's mother recently broke her silence and accused the man of being suspected of domestic violence and preference for sons. The revelation immediately attracted widespread attention and made things even more confusing. This article will further describe the details of this case and the story behind it.
On December 27, in Dexing City, Jiangxi Province, the woman did not return, and her mother revealed some key information in an interview with **. The woman's mother said that her daughter worked outside to support her three granddaughters, and her monthly salary was only 3,000 yuan. This news is worrying, after all, raising three children is not easy. What's even more confusing is that the daughters' biological father is **?Why didn't he show up in the family?The question is puzzling.
According to the woman's mother, the daughter gave birth shortly after the marriage, but was kicked out of the house by the man because she gave birth to a daughter. The man committed domestic violence against his daughter, and even kicked her lower body in an attempt to beat her to death. If it weren't for the timely intervention of the villagers, the daughter's life could be in danger. This revelation is really shocking and makes people think deeply about the man's behavior.
However, it is difficult for the outside world to link the father of the woman who claimed to have suffered domestic violence with what they consider to be a "patriarchal domestic violence man". After all, on **, the man also publicly stated that the child was innocent and hoped that people would not attack them. This situation raises more questions about the truth about the family.
According to the woman's mother, Chen Zhixian's family has a problem of domestic violence. But some people began to think about whether it is understandable that the woman's cheating behavior is a kind of revenge for the man's domestic violenceHowever, many netizens do not agree with this speculation. If the first child is biological, the man is patriarchal and abuses his ex-wife, and the ex-wife retaliates when she cheats, the story may still make sense. However, none of the three children is his biological child, and the woman's argument is obviously untenable!And, in the previous interview, the woman's attitude was aggressive and justified, which made people feel that she was born with three wrong views. In addition, the woman's mother did not mention the issue of blood, but she threw out accusations, which further confirmed the family's questioning of the problematic three views.
It is understood that the family has no face in the village. With such grandmothers and mothers, people are worried about the education of these three girls. With the lawsuit approaching, people began to wonder if the woman would dare to show up.
This case has aroused the attention and reflection of all walks of life on the issue of domestic violence. The family is the most important harbor for everyone, but domestic violence has brought serious harm to the family. Both men and women should respect each other in family relationships and refrain from using violence to solve problems.
In this case, the statements and accusations of the parties are confusing. The woman's mother revealed some details of the man's domestic violence, but the man's attitude and his words and actions towards the child did not conform to the characteristics of patriarchy. This makes it difficult to understand what the events really are.
It is important to note that family disputes often have complex backgrounds and histories. Society needs more advocacy and advocacy on family and marriage education to raise awareness of equality and respect. At the same time, the law should also crack down on and sanction domestic violence more severely to protect the rights and interests of victims.
In short, the truth of this case is still unknown, and we cannot jump to conclusions. However, this case has given us food for thought and made us realize the importance of family relationships and the responsibility to protect the vulnerable. It is only through the protection of the law and the concern of society that we can build a harmonious and equal family environment.