In the past, the inadequacy of the university evaluation system led to a large gap between the actual situation of the university and the ranking.
In order to solve this problem, the state has launched the "Double First-Class" plan in a timely manner, which is more dynamic and accurate, and provides students with a more accurate reference.
In the past, the evaluation system of colleges and universities was represented by the "985" and "211" projects, but the static and universal nature of these evaluation systems caused a lot of problems.
Some schools have a reputation, but the actual development is not satisfactory;However, some emerging institutions have made great strides in teaching and research, but are limited by ranking disadvantages.
In order to more accurately reflect the true level of colleges and universities, the state has launched the "Double First-Class" plan, which divides universities into "Class A" and "Class B", dynamically evaluates the development of universities, and makes the evaluation more accurate and timely.
With the implementation of the "Double First-Class" plan, some universities have emerged in recent years and have received widespread attention.
The University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, although it is not a "985" or "211" university, has sprung up in just a few years by virtue of its background and strong faculty of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
It has made remarkable progress in scientific research and talent training, and has become a new star among the "double first-class" universities.
Zhejiang University has developed rapidly in recent years, and many disciplines are in a leading position in the country, and its strength should not be underestimated.
Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics has surpassed many old engineering colleges and universities and has become a "new upstart" that has attracted much attention, showing a strong momentum of development.
Under the implementation of the "Double First-Class" plan, the ranking of universities has also undergone considerable changes.
There is also a large disparity in the rankings of various ranking agencies, which is quite confusing for students and parents.
In addition to considering the overall ranking of universities, students also need to take into account the professional ranking and geographical factors when choosing an institution, and conduct a comprehensive analysis and trade-off.
There are also differences in the indicators considered by different ranking agencies, so all rankings should be treated rationally and not blindly followed.
In this context, the construction of "double first-class" universities has also been questioned and controversial.
However, in general, the implementation of the "Double First-Class" plan provides students with more diversified and time-sensitive opportunities to choose colleges and universities, which helps guide students to choose universities and majors more rationally.
In this era of opportunities and challenges, students need to consider all aspects when choosing a university, and cannot blindly follow rankings.
At the same time, colleges and universities should also continuously improve their own school-running level in the construction of "double first-class" and make greater contributions to cultivating more outstanding talents.