NATO drone incident: condemnation or retreat? Recently, there was a high-profile incident in which a Russian drone strayed into the airspace of the NATO country Romania and occurred**. This event could set off a chain reaction that, in the grand scheme of things, could be seen by NATO as a Russian attack on Romania and thus open the door to war against Russia. And on a small scale, NATO can also choose to treat the incident as if nothing happened. In the end, NATO's choice was not surprising, and instead of taking tough action against Russia, they strongly condemned Russia's attack on Ukraine. According to reports, during the night attack on Ukraine by the Russian side, more than 70 drones were fired, one of which strayed into Romanian airspace and occurred. German and Romanian fighters quickly rose into the air, but did not take action to shoot down the Russian drone, and it is clear that NATO is unwilling to escalate the situation. And after that, the NATO spokesman did not accuse Russia of affecting the security of NATO countries, but stressed that the Russian drones were targeting Ukrainian port infrastructure.
This response seems to indicate that NATO is more inclined to settle the matter. NATO's attitude is perhaps understandable, as they are not willing to go to war directly with Russia. Especially after the defeat on the Ukraine issue, which is now entering the stage of abandoning Ukraine, NATO will definitely not go to war with Russia because of these trivial things. Similar things have happened in the past, such as a missile that fell on the territory of Poland by mistake, although it was eventually confirmed that it was a Ukrainian missile, but Poland and NATO showed a very restrained attitude at the beginning of the incident, for fear that a miscalculation would lead to serious consequences. Is NATO's condemnation and retreat a wise choice? In the international arena, will NATO's actions aggravate the situation, or will they be aimed at maintaining the existing order and peace? These are all questions worth pondering. However, for ordinary people, maintaining world peace is the common responsibility of every country and organization, and I hope that more rational and calm voices will emerge in the future to promote the peaceful resolution of international contradictions. The scary thing about the United States is that they can threaten and deceive other countries by all means to achieve their own ends.
NATO's attitude is so cautious, because the United States has high-ranking military officers in Europe, and they will be the first to get the news and make decisions. However, recent events have proven the weakness and hypocrisy of the United States. Biden** has been fomenting war in order to get members of Congress to approve the Ukraine Aid Act. They claim that if Ukraine is not aided, Russia will continue to invade NATO countries, which will have to make the United States go to war with Russia. Such statements only make people worry and panic, and are clearly creating an atmosphere of terror in order to gain the support of MPs. Ultimately, Russia's blunder provided the United States with an excuse to provoke a war. They can easily use this excuse to go to war with Russia as a way to prove their strength. However, in the end, the United States chose to quickly calm the situation, which fully proves the weakness and hypocrisy of the United States. The constant incitement of war by the United States will only make other countries more wary and distrustful of them. In today's globalized world, peace and cooperation between countries are the most important.
We should reject war and violence and resolve disputes peacefully. Only in this way can a future of global stability and prosperity be achieved.