was dismissed after 10 days of work, and his salary was only 45 yuan, netizens Isn t this insulting

Mondo Social Updated on 2024-01-31

Recently, the probationary period turmoil encountered by employees of a network technology company in Zhengzhou, Henan Province has aroused widespread concern in the society. According to reports, the employee was dismissed by the company after only 10 days on the job, and the final salary he received was only 45 yuan. The company produced a signed resignation application and a no-objection certificate to wages, but the employee insisted that the documents were signed under duress.

According to the provisions of the Labor Law of the People's Republic of China, the probationary period is a certain period established by the employer for the purpose of examining the employee's ability. In this case, however, the company apparently considered the trial period a "free trial period". The resignation application and the salary no-objection certificate presented by the person in charge of the company obviously cannot be used as a legal basis. After all, according to the law, an employee's salary is calculated from the first day of employment. The company's so-called "job trial" is not an excuse to deprive employees of their wages.

In addition, the company's "overlord clause" in the contract has also attracted the attention of lawyers. The lawyer said that such a clause seriously infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of workers. The company stipulates in the contract: "Those who voluntarily resign or are dismissed by the company within 90 days shall submit a letter of resignation and return their work documents, and the salary shall be paid according to the part-time job, that is, 45 yuan per order, and all subsidies shall be cancelled, and all fares and accommodation expenses incurred during the business trip shall be borne by themselves." Such a clause is undoubtedly unfair treatment of workers.

The employee signed a certificate stating that he had no objection to the method of calculating wages, but he said that it was signed at the request of the leader and not voluntarily. In this case, the person in charge of the company said that if there is coercion, the party needs to come up with evidence. This attitude is clearly a disregard for the rights and interests of workers.

Fortunately, after mediation, the two parties finally reached an agreement, and the company repaid more than 1,000 yuan to the parties. Although this incident has been satisfactorily resolved, the lessons it has taught us are profound. When faced with unfair treatment, workers should stand up bravely and protect their legitimate rights and interests. At the same time, we also call on employers to respect workers, effectively protect their rights and interests, and jointly create a fair and just labor relations environment.

The probationary period should be a process for both the employer and the employee to understand and inspect each other, and should not be an excuse for the employer to deprive the employee of his rights and interests. This incident once again reminds us that there is a long way to go to protect the rights and interests of workers. We hope that the relevant authorities can step up law enforcement efforts to crack down on violations of workers' rights and interests, so that every worker can work and live in a fair and just environment.

Related Pages