Comparing the candidates views on reunification and independence , who is the real master of peac

Mondo Workplace Updated on 2024-01-31

Candidates' "** view comparison, who is the real "master of peace"?

As Taiwan's leadership election is coming to an end, the "** view" of candidates from all walks of life has become a hot topic with far-reaching impact. This is not only related to peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, but also has a bearing on the vital interests of compatriots on both sides of the strait. Challenges and opportunities coexist, who is the real "master of peace"?

In the past, the mainland and Taiwan had a profound history, but a specific event in the election of the leader of the Taiwan region has triggered deeper thinking. With only 40 days to go until the official vote, international attention has focused on the candidates' positions on the "** issue." This is not just some kind of political abstract theory, but a practical issue that has a bearing on the life and death of compatriots on both sides of the strait.

The first to bear the brunt was the Kuomintang candidate Hou Youyi. Once, during his tenure as mayor of New Taipei, he was ambiguous about the positioning of the "92 Consensus" and ***, which caused widespread doubts. However, in a recent interview, Hou Youyi expressed his resolute opposition to "being willing to accept the '92 Consensus" and advocated eliminating the danger of war and realizing peace in the Taiwan Strait through dialogue.

As soon as this remark came out, it caused quite a stir. Some netizens commented: "Finally someone said what was in our hearts!.""Most people believe that Hou Youyi's statement is close to the mainstream public opinion in Taiwan, and it is the most practical and pragmatic expectation. His humorous style goes straight to the hearts of the people: "What we need is not fighter planes, what we need is passenger planes, to create a good time for peace." This remark is not only humorous, but also a positive vision for the future.

In stark contrast to this is *** candidate Lai Qingde. For a long time, he has been called a "diehard ** element" and has stayed away from the "92 Consensus". After losing last year's "nine-in-one" election, he obviously changed his tune and abandoned the slogan of "resisting China and protecting Taiwan" and changed it to "protecting Taiwan peacefully." However, his stance on "** remains firm. He once publicly said: "Taiwan has become 'independent', so there is no need to declare it anymore." This is obviously a disregard for the general trend of "reunification" and, even more, a disregard for reality.

Lai's remarks also raised questions. Some netizens bluntly said: "Isn't this playing tricks?."It is clear that the face of 'peace and security' is behind it, but behind it is the true face of 'stubbornness'. The "iron triangle" he joined hands with makes people speculate about the direction of his future governance. A netizen commented sharply: "The 'double independent combination' is the 'double poison combination'." ”

And between these two candidates, Ke Wenzhe's ambiguous attitude seems to be incomprehensible. During his tenure as mayor of Taipei, he stressed the need to handle cross-strait affairs in a "pragmatic" manner, but he always avoided sensitive issues such as the "consensus of '92" and "one China across the strait." Regarding the understanding of "status quo", Ke Wenzhe said: "Maintaining the status quo is the only option. However, the ambiguity of "status quo" has been interpreted differently in the eyes of different people, raising doubts.

In this election campaign, each candidate's position as the leader has become an unavoidable focus. From their statements, we can clearly see their basic position. This may become the main direction of attack in important moments such as the blue-green debate and the televised debate.

To sum up, ** is crucial for the future development of the Taiwan region. The candidate's "** view has become the standard for voters to measure, and this is not an empty slogan, but involves our homes and loved ones. At this critical juncture, we need to elect leaders who can truly maintain cross-strait peace, not those ambiguous politicians with different hearts. Who is the real "Master of Peace"?This is a question that everyone who cares about cross-strait peace should ponder.

Related Pages