Why do rural general elections no longer rely on villagers' votes?Solve the mystery
The change of political power at the grassroots level in the rural areas is a very urgent task. China has carried out a major change in the rural election, and will no longer rely on the one-vote method in the future. Many people are talking about this huge change. The following is a discussion on the pros and cons of interfering in village elections on this topic.
First, the basic situation of the work of the election of rural grassroots party organizations in China.
With the continuous changes in the countryside, after China continues to strengthen rural construction, most of the villages have their own development opportunities. In the mountain villages, there are too many funds and projects involved. Therefore, some people in the village saw this good opportunity to "fish for oil and water" and planned to take advantage of the opportunity to make a big profit.
As long as there is a benefit, there will be people who want to be in a position and do something unseemly. For example, bribing villagers to interfere with the fairness and justice of **, as well as *** activities for election campaigns. Such behaviour can seriously affect the fairness of village elections. It is precisely for this reason that China has decided to carry out the reform of the rural re-election.
2. The motives of state intervention in the change of political power in the villages.
1. Ensure the fairness of the election. As we said just now, some people rely on canvassing for votes to become village cadres and seek personal gains. Then, he can use the power in his hands to his advantage. This situation must be dealt with seriously. At that time, ** will intervene to minimize this unfair situation and ensure ultimate fairness.
2. A set of effective rural general election system has been established. In the past few years, it has been developing the countryside. However, the entire village has changed drastically over the years. That's why, everyone understands. If there is no good village cadre and good policies, then the village will be very difficult. Therefore, if we want to change the face of the countryside, we must start from the whole. We all say that the people in the village are the most important, so how to choose the right person is the most important. Only through a sound and highly efficient general election system can we truly elect qualified rural cadres for the broad masses.
3. Crack down on "village corruption". "Tigers" are hateful, but "flies" are no less harmful. In the village, there are quite a few people who directly report their demands to the village cadres. Under such circumstances, how well or badly the village cadres behave will affect their image in the eyes of the masses. Due to the negative impact of certain "village corruption," many rural people do not treat village cadres well. This kind of person must be severely punished.
3. What will be the benefits of the intervention of the village elections?
This place definitely has a lot of benefits. The general content is as follows:
1. Fair, just and open elections have been achieved. People in the village, who don't want their village to get better and better, elect a good leader, that's the best. However, without supervision and restraint, it is still unknown whether good village committee members can be elected in the end. In this case, only by coming forward can the fairness of ** be guaranteed.
2. The overall quality of the contingent of township and town cadres has been improved. In fact, over the years, the villagers can feel that the comprehensive quality of the villagers has been greatly improved. In fact, this is also the result of supervision. When it comes to the control of manpower, there are more people in the village than **.
4. Rural development under regulation and self-management.
The village is the grassroots organization at the grassroots level. The so-called self-management is, to put it bluntly, self-management. If you do nothing and let them develop on their own, then it's troublesome. Such a thing will cause great harm to the rights and interests of the villagers. On this basis, through the regulation and control of the country, the rural development will not go astray. Therefore, the development of rural areas must be supervised and self-governed. The organic integration of the two will be more beneficial to the development of the countryside.
The conclusion is that intervening in the election of village-level organizations is actually a very meaningful measure, and the purpose is to make the process of villagers' self-government achieve the purpose of fairness, justice and openness. In this way, better managers can be elected.