India has recently been plunged into chaos, and the situation has changed dramatically from the previous arrogant "assassination plan".
It all started when Indian forces were attacked by militants in the Phong Chi area of Indian-administered Kashmir, which led to the ambush of two military vehicles and the removal of nine civilians by Indian forces.
What should have been a normal interrogation turned out to be confusing. Disturbingly, three civilians died in custody and five others were admitted to military hospitals as a result of torture.
These deaths have sparked speculation about the cause of death, the most popular of which is "torture to death".
What is even more shocking is that a ** record of mistreatment of civilians by the Indian army has gone viral, allegedly on the Internet. Although the authenticity of ** has not been confirmed, the Indian authorities have adopted the means of "disconnecting the network", and it is reported that as of the 26th, the local network has been cut off for 4 consecutive days.
This practice of "disconnecting" the dissemination of information raises questions about the appearance of a self-proclaimed "democratic" country that has resorted to such means to maintain "democracy", which shows that India** seems to have failed to recognize the seriousness of the problem.
Originally, the militants launched an attack, but the Indian army targeted the local civilians, which in itself made the situation confusing. To make matters worse, the actions of the Indian army resulted in the death of three innocent people, which undoubtedly aggravated the "crime" of the Indian army.
What the Indian army is doing seems to imply: "Torture is all around us, and the truth is hidden in it." ”
The development of the whole incident is deeply worrying, but it also highlights serious human rights issues and restrictions on freedom of expression.
The dissatisfaction of the population is not due to the lack of compensation, but to the pursuit of justice. The problems caused by the militants have placed civilians on their backs, who have been beaten, electrocuted, and even to the point of losing their lives.
If not, will the Indian authorities take action to uphold justice?In other words, this so-called justice is just a façade. According to the Indian military, an investigation has been launched, but the senior officers involved have only been redeployed to another area.
Initially, in the face of strong popular discontent, the first reaction of the Indian authorities was not to appease, but to block speech. It's like sending the message that you may have grievances, but you don't have the right to express them.
How is this different from ignoring it?
In the final analysis, this may be a misunderstanding of "democracy" in India, or a simple lack of understanding at all.
India's economic development has really made progress over the past few years, and it can be said that all indicators are constantly improving. Among them, Modi has contributed a lot.
However, we also note that Modi has invested a lot of energy on the economic and military fronts, while neglecting the most basic livelihood issues, perhaps for two reasons:
First, issues related to people's livelihoods are seen as stubborn diseases, and Modi feels powerless.
Second, Modi's rise to power is for political achievements, not for people's livelihood.
It doesn't really matter whether one or both of these things coexist, but the point is that India's development seems to have fallen into a state of solidification – focusing only on superficial prosperity and less about internal problems.
From this point of view, India's style of conduct is simply a repetition of the old ways of the Western world.
The slogans are deafening, and the slogans of freedom and democracy are resounding in the sky, but no one seems to care about the actual situation, and they only need to curry favor with their voters. However, India may not have thought about its own basic strength, and it may not be as good as the West.
Even without ensuring a solid foundation, some countries have chosen to rely on external forces and emulate the deception of the West. Isn't this behavior a clear challenge to fate?
Therefore, problems in India are almost a certainty, and the only uncertainty is when the problem will erupt. The current big scandal is just a small warning sign. If Modi does not take fundamental measures, an even bigger crisis could erupt in the future.
Regrettably, India is still watching whether its neighbors are cooperating with China on the "economic and trade express", which makes people feel helpless. But when a crisis erupts, we must keep our distance.
After all, only India would resort to such a measure as disconnecting the internet for democracy.