Recently, the topic of "endurance achievement rate" of new energy models has become popular in the car circle. In fact, as a key indicator of new energy vehicles, the endurance achievement rate has always been the focus of consumers' attention. It's just that as ordinary consumers, most people don't have the opportunity to measure, so they can only refer to the official data and the best test.
However, after this topic has attracted heated discussions recently, some car companies have personally tested their "self-innocence", including NIO, which has been hot. Recently, Li Bin, the founder of NIO, announced that it will test its 150-degree battery pack. The test method is to drive the NIO ET7 model from Shanghai to test how far the ET7 equipped with a 150-degree battery pack can drive on the highway. The goal of this test is to challenge 1000 kilometers of range with a 150-degree battery pack. In order to ensure the authenticity of this test, NIO adopted the method of live broadcast of the whole process, and everything was open and transparent.
I have to admit that NIO does understand the "traffic rules", and when the live broadcast room is opened, the final number of views in its official live broadcast room is easily millions of people. Therefore, from the perspective of "**", or NIO failed to complete the challenge of 1000 kilometers with a 150-degree battery pack this time, its test method of "the boss personally broadcast the high-speed test" has helped it to become the "hot" of the car circle.
However, how can the founder personally go to the field to test, coupled with the publicity and warm-up of the whole network, how can the challenge fail?In the end, according to the official data, when the vehicle has 6% of the remaining power, the test has traveled 1016 kilometers, and the comprehensive power consumption of the trip is 132kwh, ambient temperature 12, interior temperature 18. Judging from the results alone, NIO's challenge can certainly be regarded as an indisputable success. However, after the results were announced, netizens didn't seem to buy it.
Among them, the most controversial issue is the issue of 90 km/h. In fact, this kind of driving is completely understandable, after all, for pure electric vehicles, the faster you run, the more electricity is an immutable law. Therefore, if the speed is controlled at about 90km h, the range will indeed be longer. But then again, such a test method is not in line with daily Xi usage, and how many people will drive at such a speed on the highway?Therefore, everyone's doubts are not unreasonable. According to official data, when its battery life exceeds 1,000 kilometers, the temperature in the car shows 18, which is enough to show that in order to achieve battery life, even the air conditioner in the car is not willing to "drive full horsepower", and finally reluctantly achieved the goal of breaking 1,000 kilometers.
Unbiased evaluation, are netizens spraying too much?It's not too much, because what everyone wants to see is the real endurance performance of the NIO 150-degree battery in simulating a normal car environment, but it turns out that the endurance results brought by running 90km h at high speed and not daring to turn on the air conditioner are not large, so the actual reference value is not large.
In other words, this NIO, at the publicity level, not only wanted to create the feeling of "simulating daily driving endurance test", but actually had to sacrifice some inherent Xi of daily driving in order to have a battery life of more than 1,000 kilometers, and finally smart was mistaken by smart. If it is emphasized from the beginning that this test is only a challenge of 1000 kilometers of battery life, then in order to achieve the goal, it seems reasonable at all costs, and at the same time, netizens can also directly feel the true strength of the 150-degree battery pack, do you say this is the truth?