With the approach of the third round of land contracting, the issue of land contracting policy has once again become the focus of social attention. Over the past few decades, our land policy has undergone many changes. The implementation of the land contract responsibility system has given peasants greater autonomy and greatly improved agricultural production efficiency.
However, over time, some problems have gradually become apparent. One of the issues of concern is the phenomenon that "the dead have land, but the living have no land". According to the land contract responsibility system, the right to distribute land is in the hands of the village collective. When a member of a family dies, the land is repossessed and redistributed to other farmers in need. However, due to various reasons, after the death of a member of a family, their land is not repossessed and continues to be used by other family members. As a result, some of the deceased still own land, while some of the living peasants have no land to plant. This irrational phenomenon not only affects the rational use of land resources, but also undermines the principle of fairness and justice.
There are different views and suggestions in society on this issue. Those who support the redistribution of goods believe that this will better protect the land rights and interests of farmers. They believe that every farmer should own his own land and not depend on the land of a certain family member. At the same time, the disruption of redistribution can also avoid the waste of land resources and improve agricultural production efficiency. However, opponents of disrupting the redistribution argue that such an approach could undermine the existing rural social fabric. They believe that the land contract responsibility system has been in place for many years, and if the policy is changed suddenly, it may have an impact on rural social stability. In addition, they are also worried that the disruption of the redistribution may lead to the loss of land for some farmers, which will affect their lives and production.
So, should the phenomenon of "the dead have land, the living have no land" be solved?Should the third round of land contracting be disrupted by re-division?This requires us to think and weigh in from multiple perspectives.
First of all, we need to realize that the land contract responsibility system is an important institutional guarantee for China's agricultural development. In the past few decades, this system has made a great contribution to the development of agriculture in our country and the increase of farmers' income. The land contract responsibility system provides farmers with stable land use rights and income, enabling them to obtain a stable income from the land. At the same time, this system also provides farmers with a certain sense of security and security, so that they are more motivated to devote themselves to agricultural production and rural development.
Second, we need to think about how to solve the problem of "the dead have land, but the living have no land". This requires the joint efforts of the village, the village collectives and the farmers. ** Relevant policies can be introduced to strengthen the management and supervision of land contracting to ensure the rational distribution and use of land. Village collectives can actively organize and coordinate to ensure the fair distribution and circulation of land. Peasants, on the other hand, can raise their production capacity and income level through their own efforts and struggles, and strive for more land resources.
Finally, we need to consider how to balance the interests of all parties. Those who support or oppose the disruption of the rescore have their own interests. Therefore, we need to find a solution that can not only protect farmers' land rights and interests, but also maintain rural social stability through in-depth research and full discussion. Consideration can be given to establishing a more perfect mechanism for land ownership and circulation, strengthening the management and supervision of land contracting, and promoting the rational circulation and optimal allocation of land resources. At the same time, through financial support and technical guidance, we can help farmers improve land use efficiency, improve the level of agricultural production, and promote farmers to increase their income and get rich.
In short, the issue of "the dead have land, but the living have no land" is a complex and sensitive issue. We need to think and weigh from multiple perspectives to find a suitable solution. At the same time, we also need to recognize the value and role of the land contract responsibility system, as well as the arduous and long-term nature of solving this problem. Only in this way can we better protect the land rights and interests of peasants and maintain the stable development of rural society. In the implementation of the new round of land contract responsibility system, we should take the interests of the peasants as the starting point and formulate more scientific and rational policies in light of the actual conditions in different localities to promote the development of the rural economy and the happy life of the peasants. In practice, it is necessary to strengthen supervision, ensure the stability and fairness of the land contract responsibility system, and protect the legitimate rights and interests of farmers. Farmers should also play their main role, actively participate in the management and operation of the land contract responsibility system through cooperatives and professional farmer cooperatives, and promote the transformation and upgrading of the rural economy and the increase of farmers' income. Only the joint efforts of farmers and all sectors of society can promote the sustainable development of China's agriculture and realize the beautiful vision of a happy life for farmers.