In extremely cold weather, the range of pure electric vehicles has always been a headache. In order to fully understand the performance of various new energy vehicles, Auto** held a winter range test event. During the entire test process, a total of 17 models participated in the battery life test of pure electric sedans. These models range from 100,000 yuan to more than 1 million yuan, covering all price points and brands. In this test, domestic pure electric cars accounted for a larger proportion, showing China's development strength in the field of new energy vehicles. All vehicles involved in the test were fully charged the night before the test and tested after an overnight standstill. In order to simulate real driving conditions, each seat is loaded with 60 tons of counterweight, except for the driver's seat. During the test, all vehicles were tested using Economy mode, with the air conditioning temperature set at 24 degrees automatic, while maximizing kinetic energy**. Moreover, all vehicles depart in a unified formation, maintaining a consistent speed and driving route. In the end, the test results ended with the driving computer showing that the driving power is 0 kilometers or the power is obviously limited, and the vehicle speed cannot be higher than 50 kilometers per hour.
In this endurance test, the NIO ET7 and NIO ET5T models have the greatest advantage in battery capacity, both reaching 100 kWh. The official range of the NIO ET7 is 675 km, while the NIO ET5T is 680 km. This is followed by the Audi RS e-tron GT and the ARCFOX Alfa S, with an Audi RS e-tron GT battery capacity of 934 kWh, the official range is 495 km, while the ARCFOX Alpha S battery capacity is 936 kWh, with an official range of 735 km. In addition, the battery capacity of the Feifan F7 is also considerable, reaching 90 kWh, and the official pure electric range is 666 km. Tesla Model 3 and Haobo GT although the battery capacity is 784 kWh and 80 kWh, but the official range is also more than 700 km. The Tesla Model 3 has an official range of 713 km, while the Haobo GT has 710 km. Looking at these figures, you might think that these cars would perform very well in this winter range test, however, the results were unexpected. The actual test results show that in extremely cold weather, the range performance of pure electric vehicles is not satisfactory.
While these models exhibit a long range in ideal conditions, the situation is quite different in extreme cold. In extremely cold weather, the range is noticeably affected, and some models even show unexpectedly short range. This result has attracted a lot of attention from industry insiders and consumers. Through this winter range test, consumers have a clearer understanding of the actual range performance of pure electric vehicles in extremely cold environments. This also reminds car companies that they need to pay more attention to the performance in extreme weather when developing new energy vehicles to improve user experience and vehicle reliability. At the same time, consumers also need to consider the impact of climate on cruising range when buying pure electric vehicles, and choose models suitable for their own use scenarios to ensure the convenience and comfort of daily use. In addition, for the entire new energy vehicle market, this winter endurance test also provides consumers with more choices for reference. The actual endurance performance of each model in an extremely cold environment will also become one of the important reference factors for consumers when choosing a model. Therefore, car companies need to continue to improve the performance of their vehicles in extreme weather to win the trust and favor of consumers.
In summary, winter range testing provides consumers with more comprehensive information and makes car companies realize that performance in extreme weather is crucial. It is hoped that in the future, car companies can pay more attention to the performance in extreme environments in the research and development of new energy vehicles, and provide consumers with more reliable and practical new energy vehicle products. In the latest release of winter range test data, the BYD Seal among the 17 models scored an astonishing 50With a range achievement rate of 34%, it stands out as the model with the best range performance. It is followed by the ARCFOX Alpha S, with a battery life achievement rate of up to 5018%。In contrast, 12 models, including the Tesla Model 3 and NIO ET5T, have a range achievement rate of less than 50%. And the Toyota BZ3, BMW i3 and Volkswagen ID3 are at the bottom, and their endurance achievement rate is less than 40%. Among the 17 models, among the three domestic pure electric vehicles with the highest range achievement rate, who can win the first place?Let's unravel the mystery together. In this winter endurance test, the BYD seal became the focus with its excellent endurance performance. 50.With a range achievement rate of 34 percent, this model stands out as the frontrunner among all the models tested.
It is followed by the Alpha S of the Extreme Fox, with its 50The 18% range attainment rate is also impressive. At the same time, the range achievement rate of 12 models, including Tesla's Model 3 and NIO ET5T, failed to break through the 50% mark. And the Toyota BZ3, BMW i3 and Volkswagen ID3 are worrisome, and their endurance achievement rate is less than 40%. Such a result will undoubtedly give consumers a clearer understanding of the range performance of each model. Among the many domestic pure electric vehicles, the performance of models such as BYD Seal and ARCFOX Alpha S has attracted much attention. Its 5034% and 50The 18% range achievement rate is impressive. At the same time, the range achievement rate of Tesla Model 3 and NIO ET5T has not been satisfactory, which has also aroused people's attention to the range performance of new energy vehicles. In addition, the Toyota BZ3, BMW i3 and Volkswagen IDThe battery life of the 3 is a wake-up call. These data undoubtedly provide an important reference for consumers when buying a car. For these 17 models participating in the test, the data of the range achievement rate is undoubtedly the most concerned by consumers.
BYD Seal with 50The 34% endurance achievement rate is firmly at the top of the list, making it the leader in this test. And the Polar Fox Alpha S 50The 18% range achievement rate is also impressive. However, the range performance of 12 models, such as Tesla's Model 3 and NIO ET5T, failed to meet the 50% standard. Especially the Toyota BZ3, BMW i3 and Volkswagen ID3. Their endurance achievement rate is even lower than worrying. This data will undoubtedly play an important role in consumers' car purchase decisions, helping them to choose new energy vehicles that are more in line with their personal needs. In this winter endurance test, the BYD Seal came in at 50The 34% endurance achievement rate tops the list, making it a well-deserved leader. And the Polar Fox Alpha S 50The 18% range attainment rate is also impressive. However, 12 models, including the Tesla Model 3 and NIO ET5T, failed to achieve the 50% range achievement rate. More worrying are the Toyota BZ3, BMW i3 and Volkswagen IDThe battery life of the 3 is even lower than 40%. These data will undoubtedly become an important reference for consumers when buying a car, helping them to choose new energy vehicles that meet their personal needs.
To sum up, BYD Seal is priced at 50The endurance achievement rate of 34% has become the leader in this winter endurance test, and the ARCFOX Alpha S is 50The 18% range attainment rate is also impressive. However, 12 models, including Tesla's Model 3 and NIO ET5T, failed to achieve the 50% range achievement rate. And the Toyota BZ3, BMW i3 and Volkswagen IDThe battery life of the 3 is even more worryingly low. These data will undoubtedly become an important reference for consumers when buying a car, helping them to choose new energy vehicles that meet their personal needs.