The higher the ratings of "Thrush", the sadder the spy war drama!
Look at the ratings of "Thrush", it is really amazing, and it is getting higher and higher day by day. The peak has broken 3, and I have to say that the spy war drama is still the audience's favorite. But such a good subject matter is now difficult to produce a good work, and one is more disappointing than the other.
Therefore, the higher the ratings, the sadder the spy war drama is.
Some netizens shouted"This drama is insulting the intelligence of the common people!”
Of course, some netizens pointed out more specific problems.
"The movies of the 50s and 60s paid attention to the authenticity of the content, clothes, hairstyles, accents, and props all looked alike, and the current movies and TV series are for people 100 years later, so they don't pay attention to anything, only the face. Therefore, there is no need to have high hopes for this drama, in general, there are no major contradictions, just watch a lively one, otherwise you won't be able to pass a single episode, and you won't even be able to pass the exterior of the instrument factory. ”
And this is also a common problem in today's anti-Japanese war dramas and spy war dramas.
I still remember the one who was severely criticized until he was taken off the shelves"Thunder Warrior".Is it?
The "soldiers of the Eighth Route Army" in the play live in a luxurious villa, and the protagonists are almost all painted with hairspray and wax, and Shengsheng made a war drama into an idol drama, and was finally taken off the shelves and stopped broadcasting.
Now this phenomenon has happened again in spy war dramas.
In the past two years, one after another thunderous spy war dramas have been broadcast, all of which have developed towards idolization, and they are seriously distorted in terms of the sense of age, just like today's "Thrush", from the shape of the protagonist to the scenes in the play, there is no sense of age at all.
Of course, these dramas these days are all designed to appeal to younger audiences.
But what about the result?
It's hard to put into words. are insulting the audience and trampling on history, but the director doesn't think so.
The director of "Thrush" said in an interview that as a play, a major difficulty isHow to make the audience be able to watch patiently all the time. To do this, what needs to be done is to design each character and plot paragraph reasonably.
And he also knows that the actors are all from the new generation, and even he himself is not very clear about that era, so he is as close to that era as possible.
I have to say, the truth is being told here.
So what exactly did you do?
That's it"I refer to a lot of movies of that era, including the state of the characters' performances, to feel the breath of the characters, to find that simple and positive state. ”
But the result is the current state, which is seriously distorted.
The director is always trying to attract the audience, and he knows that the main creators have not experienced that era, and they don't know much about that era, and it is true that there is always a lot of work for this, but the result is still not enough, which has led to today's tragic situation.
In this way, the director also said:
"You have to convince these young people that those people of that era would speak like this, act like this, be such a style, be such a mental outlook. ”
"Let him see not the current image of the public security, try not to make them feel that it is today's people who are pretending to act in the past, but let him feel that it is people of that era who have walked on the screen. ”
Seeing such an interview, you will understand why there is such a presentation in this drama today.
Looking at the plots broadcast today, there is no doubt that the era is distorted. In addition to the problem of character makeup, even the small town set in the play is not inferior to the big city, it is obviously a fourth- or fifth-tier small city, but all aspects of the conditions and facilities are called luxury.
Then there is the character falsehood, and the falsehood naturally includes the entire makeup aspect, and then the character design. As a public security officer, the heroine is driving high and going low, and the more problems she has in the future, she is brave and unscrupulous, and she is simple-minded. And the male protagonist, as an expert, has always been outside of his work.
Although the play emphasizes that there is no emotional line at the beginning, a little emotional drama is added from time to time, and even polyamorous emotional relationships appear.
First of all, Pang Hongmei and Ji Expert often acted together, and even quarreled with each other like flirting, but now Pang Hongmei, Ji Expert and Bai Hui ** are acting together, which makes the emotional relationship between the three quite delicate.
For example, in the latest plot, the three of them went up the mountain together to find rutile. Not to mention the emotional relationship, such an important action is protected by a public security officer, and all three of them are wearing leather shoes, and the two female characters are wearing high heels, without any sense of security. And when they reached the top of the mountain, they shouted"We've got to find the rutile".
Security awareness, confidentiality awareness, basic common sense ......
In this drama, these aspects are extremely poorly done.
As a logical spy war drama, "Thrush" is anti-logical and unconventional everywhere.
Every episode has a plot hole, and every episode is a big surprise.
When the reporter asked"Seeing the two leading actors will still bring in an 'idol drama' temperament. During the filming, did you use any ways to erase the 'idol feeling' of the two leading actors?”
The director replied:"First of all, consider his role, which must be in line with the temperament of the characters in the play, whether it is public security or scientific research experts, each character must have its own positioning, and this positioning must be strictly around the theme of the story. We don't deliberately design some of their states, but help them get into the characters, and naturally give the most natural and realistic performance. ”
According to this passage, and then look at the performance and design in the play, isn't everything just highlighting the "sense of idol".
The public security does not have the appearance of public security, and the experts do not have the appearance of experts, and everything they do is without any security considerations. Maybe they didn't really have some states designed for them, but that's the most important thing. Because the director said before that these young actors have not experienced that era, if they play arbitrarily, then it is inevitable to deviate, and they are all performing the characters at that time in their current state, although they are real but false.
Such a drama is seriously misleading to young audiences.
Through such a drama, how can the younger generation fully understand the real situation of that era and the heroic deeds of the revolutionary martyrs of that era.
In the hearts of young audiences, people of that era spoke and acted like this, and the consequences were unimaginable.
There is nothing wrong with catering to young audiences and being innovative, but the problem is that we must first respect history and not go off the rails. Especially on the theme of revolutionary history, we should be full of warmth and respect for history, and not a child's play. Only with awe, respect for history, and respect for the audience can we make a masterpiece.