This is a recent move by Turkish security services, which destroyed a series of facilities linked to the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) and signaled that the group is facing a full clean-up operation.
Turkey** has long considered the PKK a terrorist organization and has taken resolute measures to combat its activities in the country.
At the same time, however, relations between Turkey and the PKK are unusually complex and strained.
On the Syrian issue, Turkey and the Kurdistan Workers' Party become a delicate balance between friend and foe.
In the midst of the chaos in Syria and the rise of ISIS, the PKK seized the opportunity to establish its own base in Syria with the support of Western countries, including the United States.
As time went on, Turkey was increasingly feeling the increased pressure.
They fear that the existence of a substantially independent region in the neighbouring country could have an impact and a threat to Turkey's stability.
Thus, in recent weeks, the Turkish army has frequently conducted military operations against PKK targets aimed at weakening and eliminating the group's foothold in Syria.
The Turkish military operation dealt a major blow to the Kurdistan Workers' Party.
According to reports, the targets of the Turkish strikes include military, economic and logistical facilities of the Kurdistan Workers' Party.
These blows plunged the group into a crisis, quickly losing many important locations and severely weakening.
However, it was not only the PKK's side that suffered losses in this war.
The Turkish security services, in launching a powerful strike against high-ranking Kurdish members, inadvertently injured innocent civilians and caused innocent people.
The international community expressed concern at Turkey's actions and called for a ceasefire to be achieved as soon as possible in order to protect children and other vulnerable groups.
The most striking focus is that the Kurdistan Workers' Party used the American ** to strike at Turkish soldiers.
This not only highlights the reality of the intensification of conflict in the Middle East, but also raises questions once again about the real intentions of the United States behind this war.
It must be admitted that the United States has always held an important and delicate position on Middle East affairs.
Whether it is Bush's support for the Iraq war to promote democracy, or Obama's attempt to defuse tensions and strengthen the nuclear deal through diplomatic means to protect their own interests, they all show that they want to protect their own security, promote economic development, and shape the Middle East pattern that meets their values and interests by influencing the process of regime reform in the region.
Recently, an incident in which the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) used advanced ** provided by the United States to strike at Turkish soldiers has sparked widespread controversy. The change in the position of the United States in support of the Kurds has a direct impact on regional conflicts, making the situation more complex and dangerous.
As a member of NATO, Turkey has a close security partnership with the United States, and any support for the Kurdish independence movement is firmly opposed by Turkey. The escalation of tensions between the two sides has further exacerbated instability in the Middle East.
In addition, other neighboring countries have also begun to act for their own interests and security. Iraq, Syria and other places have long been plagued by internal conflicts and terrorist activities, and in this context, they have also become the focus of contention among all parties. We cannot ignore other influencing factors, such as Russia's intervention in Syria, tensions between Iran and Israel, and the rivalry of regional powers such as Saudi Arabia.
As a global superpower, the United States plays an important role in the Middle East issue, and a change in its stance is bound to provoke a strong reaction from all sides. Against this backdrop, Turkey's tough statements by Erdogan have raised concerns that the conflict will not be easy to subside.
Erdogan said he would not tolerate the presence of terrorist groups in northern Syria and Iraq, and expected the military operation against the Kurdistan Workers' Party to continue. These tough words have further heightened tensions in the situation, as if there is no end in sight to the conflict.
As one of Turkey's top leaders, Erdogan obviously attaches great importance to the issue, and he has publicly stated that he will not tolerate the existence of terrorist organizations, in order to demonstrate Turkey's determination to fight terrorists and defend the country's borders and the safety of its people. In short, Turkey's tough statements by Erdogan have raised concerns that the conflict will not be easy to subside in the current situation.
Resolving such disputes requires restraint, the establishment of mechanisms for dialogue and joint efforts to find a viable solution. It is only through cooperation and communication that we can bring real peace and stability to northern Syria and Iraq.