I saw a remark on the Internet that said: It turns out that many of our university teachers worship foreigners!This is actually a very problematic statement.
First of all, we need to understand what a university is, and the mechanism of a university includes the content of the vast majority of subjects Xi in university, all of which are modern and do not have our original content. Most of the first universities and hospitals were built by missionaries or benefited from outside capital.
In the West, the predecessor of the university was the seminary that studied theology, with the purpose of seeking the world created by the Creator and seeking the Creator. Since then, a variety of specific disciplines have been introduced, and many of the great philosophers of science we know now were all seminarians, including Newton.
Further back, of course, it is also combined with the collegiate system of ancient Greece in the Old Testament, which was after Thomas Aquinas started scholasticism in the Middle Ages, and proposed that although man cannot fully know God (ontology), he can try to understand God's will. Since then, the theological monopoly of the absolute meaning of Catholicism has been broken.
Therefore, we can conclude that the predecessor of the university was the seminary, and since our university teachers are all through the university system, it is natural that the modern knowledge content of the Xi is learned, and its roots are in the West. Unless we cancel all the universities. And the university as we understand it is nothing more than an extension of the concept of the Confucian "university". In other words, the purpose of studying at university is actually the purpose pointed to by Confucianism, at least subconsciously as the first purpose, and no one thinks there is a problem.
Then the term "Chongyang flattering foreigners", or was born in the Qing Dynasty and the ** period, means that in order to achieve this condition, it is necessary to accept the systematic Xi of the Chinese body, such as the content of the previous academy, Xi the subset of the classics and history, the qin, chess, calligraphy and painting. How many people meet this standard?Who has undergone this kind of training from the current university system?Have the people who issued this kind of denunciation systematically Xi?This requires everyone to think about it in detail.
Taking advantage of this topic, I would also like to talk about the problem of our academic school, based on the above-mentioned source of the university is the seminary, which means that our university is cut off from the beginning. It's a stitch monster. Because its root is a plausible Chinese body, and the knowledge content of learning Xi is Western technology, people do not know what the purpose Xi of learning these technologies is. This means that many of our academic teachers may be strange beings. Although the knowledge is very extensive, the values can be confusing and often to the point. Those who have strong Xi ability to learn independently will touch the philosophical part, but they only seem to understand it, although they often laugh at folk scholars, in fact, they are also half-hearted. Those with poor self-learning Xi ability will be more inclined to Confucian intellectuals, which is what we now call brick family, which is actually an atavistic phenomenon.
I realize that there are very few problems in our university, and I hope to provide some reference for those who have such problems!