In recent years, the form of leaderless interview has become more and more popular, whether it is the recruitment interview of civil servants, or the recruitment of some public institutions or teachers, the leaderless interview has gradually replaced other forms of interview. However, many candidates are very new to leaderless interviews, or even know nothing. In the process of a leaderless interview with a large number of candidates in the same position or not in the same position, each candidate especially wants to stand out and get the best success of this exam. Therefore, in the leaderless interview, the candidate's desire to win will be heavier than that of the candidate in the structured interview, but as everyone knows, sometimes the exam room wins others but can't win the examiner's heart, and finally loses the interview. Today, let's talk about the "winning" and "losing" in leaderless interviews.
First of all, it is well known that leaderless interviews take a long time, generally about an hour. During the whole interview process, the examiner does not speak the whole process, and as a third party, quietly observes the performance of all candidates in the examination room, and gives the final comprehensive interview score according to the performance level.
So, what each examiner said and did for such a long time, what kind of small movements and mental activities they had, the examiner basically guessed. If you don't pay attention to these politeness questions, then you will lose your sense of proportion and make the examiner feel rude.
Secondly, the leaderless interview is generally divided into a personal statement, free discussion and summary speech. So, if the personal statement is to show the individual's ability to think and do things, then the free discussion focuses more on the contest between dealing with people and emotional intelligence. The personal statement does not involve other people's speeches, you only need to make your own statements.
In free discussion, we must not only express what we have said well, but also pay attention to what others have to say. For example, accepting the content of other people's speeches or refuting other people's views is to continue the statement of the former candidate's point of view, remember not to talk about yourself, or to mess around, so that even if you seem to have the upper hand in the whole group, in the eyes of the examiner, it will be understood as a confusion of thinking logic, winning others and losing yourself.
In addition, in the examination room, there will be most candidates who will blindly emphasize their own opinions, always think that they are right, ignore the statements of other candidates, or repeatedly attack other points of view. Such a candidate, even if in the end everyone compromised and chose his choice.
However, in the eyes of the examiner, it will feel that the candidate is stubborn, obsessive, and not suitable for the talents required for civil service positions, so that even if he wins this game, he will lose hearts and lose points.
Therefore, in a leaderless interview, the "loss" and "win" of the individual are not actually the most important. The most important thing is to reflect the role of the individual in the overall team, sometimes as a presenter of new ideas, sometimes as a guide for the direction of discussion, sometimes as a mediator for other candidates' arguments, and even sometimes as a partner to raise questions and summarize ideas.
Therefore, in the leaderless interview, the person who really "wins" wins the diversified roles in this group of candidates, wins the heart of the examiner, and wins the principle and flexible way of doing things. Winning is not personal heroism, nor is it the answer to this question, nor is it one's original choice.
In a word, in the leaderless interview, "it doesn't matter who loses and who wins, the last laugh is king". Don't be too quick to be in the limelight, and don't blindly follow the trend. Remember, this is a play, a play to show your character and ability, say your own lines, and play the role of an excellent civil servant.