The mystery behind the 20-year lawsuit has been revealed, who owns these two precious ancestral magic weapons?
On January 6, 2005, a rare lawsuit over cultural relics kicked off in court, attracting a lot of attention. Cases brought by ordinary people against the Cultural Relics Bureau are not common, and it is usually the Cultural Relics Bureau that prosecutes criminals who resell cultural relics under the Cultural Relics Law. However, this 20-year-old case has turned tradition upside down, with the identities of the plaintiff and the defendant reversed, and the facts of the case are bizarre, and both sides have their own opinions.
The facts of the case are mysterious, and the ancestral magic weapons involved are the stone medicine mill of the Tang Dynasty and the black pottery bowl of the more ancient Qin Dynasty. Liu Cuichai said that the two magic weapons were ancestral objects and wanted to ask nearby cultural relics experts to help identify them, while Gao Yingmin claimed that the two antiques were handed over to him by the staff of the Cultural Relics Bureau, and they were identified as cultural relics unearthed from the tomb of the Tang Dynasty.
The doubts and difficulties in this case made the ** official hesitate. Liu Cuichai and Wang Yuwen, a worker at the Cultural Relics Bureau, had a disagreement over the ownership of the two antiques, and the two sides insisted on their own words and fell into a lawsuit.
One of the ancestral magic weapons in Liu Cuichai's mouth is a stone medicine mill in the Tang Dynasty, and the other is a black pottery bowl from the more ancient Qin Dynasty. Why were these two antiques appraised and handed over to the state?Is Gao Yingmin the only intermediary in this whole thing?
Gao Yingmin claimed that the staff of the Cultural Relics Bureau gave him the two antiques, and based on the soil, they were determined to be cultural relics unearthed from a Tang Dynasty tomb. However, Liu Cuichai's original intention was to ask nearby cultural relics experts to help identify her ancestral treasures, not to donate them to the Cultural Relics Bureau. The cause and effect of the whole case is even more confusing.
In the first instance, the court did not directly announce the verdict, and during the period when the verdict was announced, Gao Yingmin's statement was supported during the collegial process. The collegial opinion held that the age of these two antiques was consistent with the burial goods of the tomb owner of the archaeological site, and they were recognized as national cultural relics. The dust has also become the focus of controversy, and the evidence that Liu Cuichai participated in the discovery and guided the archaeological team to excavate has become the basis for supporting the statement of the Cultural Relics Bureau.
However, Liu Cuichai was dissatisfied with the verdict. More than 20 years later, she took out a 27-year-old contract for the purchase of cultural relics, proving that the two antiques were her ancestral. This became the basis for the case to move forward.
More than 20 years ago, archaeological excavations of the Tang Dynasty tomb found only six artifacts, and each artifact went through strict identification and trial procedures. However, Liu Cuichai took out the contract for the purchase of cultural relics, proving that the stone medicine mill and the black pottery bowl did not appear in the excavated cultural relics of that year.
This case entered the "Today's Statement" column group and attracted widespread attention. The trial team was reorganized, and judges with many years of experience in adjudicating cultural relics cases were added to retry the case.
In the second instance, Zhengding County argued that the Cultural Relics Bureau's process of determining that Liu Cuichai's two antiques were donated as cultural relics did not comply with the procedures. It was determined that the stone medicine mill and black pottery bowl that Liu Cuichai handed over to Wang Yuwen were not cultural relics. However, because the purchase contract in Liu Cuichai's hand cannot be used as a legal basis due to the age, the ownership of the two antiques is still not clear.
Although the second-instance judgment ruled that the two antiques were not cultural relics, the purchase contract in Liu Cuichai's hand became strong evidence of her ancestral antiques. Zhengding County finally ruled that the two ancestral antiques should be returned to Liu Cuichai, ending nearly 30 years of contention.
Unlike other cultural relics cases, Liu Cuichai's success in obtaining ownership of the ancestral antiques was mainly due to the evidence she provided and the fact that the two antiques were not listed as cultural relics by the cultural relics preservation. This case provides a clear answer to the question of the proper execution of the judicial process.
This cultural relics lawsuit has shifted the focus from tomb robbers and criminals who have poured down the cultural relics to the ownership of ancestral treasures. It is not only a legal battle, but also a question about the importance of the implementation of the Cultural Heritage Protection**. Behind this tortuous journey is the preservation and competition for ancestral cultural heritage.
The article details the twists and turns of a 20-year lawsuit involving a dispute over the ownership of two ancestral artifacts. As you can see from the title, this lawsuit is extraordinary and catchy to read. By describing the causes and consequences of the case, the claims and evidence of both parties, and the different stages of the trial, the article presents the full picture of a confusing cultural relics lawsuit.
First of all, the article uses vivid language and detailed descriptions in the process of revealing the facts of the case, so that readers can clearly understand the claims and arguments of both sides. The competition for ancestral magic weapons is not only a conflict at the legal level, but also involves issues of family culture and inheritance, which makes the lawsuit particularly complicated.
Second, the author highlights the change in the focus of the dispute between the parties by depicting the process of the court trial, which makes the plot of the whole lawsuit more compelling. The reversals produced at different stages of the trial and the emergence of new evidence add suspense to the whole case and make the reader look forward to the ending even more.
The article concludes by pointing out that the winner of the lawsuit is the plaintiff, Liu Cuichai, who successfully obtained the ownership of the two ancestral antiques. The result of the retrial in Zhengding County is not only the protection of Liu Cuichai's personal rights and interests, but also the return to justice of the legal process. This provides a clear case for the standardized implementation of the judicial process, and also reflects the importance attached to traditional cultural heritage in cultural relics lawsuits.
The uniqueness of this case is that, unlike ordinary cultural relics cases, it is not the stolen cultural relics that are being contested, but the ancestral cultural heritage. This makes the whole lawsuit full of emotional factors, not only legal disputes, but also family cultural inheritance. This integration of emotional factors makes it easier for readers to resonate with the story and increases the appeal of the article.
Overall, this review carefully analyzes the highlights and characteristics of the article, and digs deep into the theme of the cultural relics lawsuit, so that readers have a deeper understanding of the whole picture of this tortuous lawsuit.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!