Strictly speaking, no.
Because where there is demand, there will be a market. As long as exams are used as a way to advance to higher education, and grades are used as the criterion for further education, then extracurricular tutoring cannot be banned.
What is the definition of extracurricular tutoring?Is it outside of the "classroom" or outside of "school Xi time"?Or is it something else?To give you a few examples, when you go to the office to ask a question when you Xi in the evening, and the teacher tells you, is it considered extracurricular tutoring?After you Xi at night, hit ** to ask the teacher a question, and the teacher told you, is it considered extracurricular tutoring?You can't do homework on weekends, so ask your cousin and cousin who were admitted to college, is it considered extracurricular tutoring?You bought a reference book yourself, you don't understand, search for a ** on the Internet to see the explanation, is it considered that ** recorded the person who did extracurricular tutoring for you?
The most outrageous report I've heard is that of a teacher tutoring her child at home. The reason is: why can the teacher give a lecture to this child after class?It's not fair.
The goal of the teachers in the school is to "ask for grades in 45 minutes". But can it be said that the student did not produce a grade in these 45 minutes, and studied a little more after class?Can you ask someone for advice?Is it a sin to want to improve yourself?
At least I think that improving oneself should not be considered a mistake. As for some people who think, "If you go to an after-school tutoring class, it's unfair to those students who can't attend the tutoring class." "Please, when you can't find a job and can't eat in the future, can you count on those "classmates who didn't go to tutorial classes back then" to support you?No, I can't. Speaking of fairness, is there a roll in the country?Is the score line unified?What is fair or unfair in this situation is nothing more than someone who is stupid and bad and lazy, and wants to drag everyone into the water and lie down, and the idea is probably "I can't learn well, so you can't be good", which is worse than rotten.
The so-called "double reduction" does not mean that there is anything wrong with the policy, but I think that in order to achieve the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, we can expect to be admitted to high school soon, but it is definitely not possible to count on a child who can still be equal to 3 if you count 8-4 equals 3.