Title: Aircraft carriers are weak?Why is the United States "instigated" by Iranian drones, and the hidden international game behind it!
Aircraft carrier weakness?Why is the United States "instigated" by Iranian drones, and the hidden international game behind it!
Once upon a time, the American aircraft carrier was the invincible division of the world's navies, like a moving impassable castle. However, a recent unexpected drama in the Persian Gulf makes people question the strength of the United States. In the face of the arrogant provocation of Iranian drones over aircraft carriers, it is really incomprehensible that the United States has shown an unconventional passive response posture.
Iranian drones roam freely over the US aircraft carrier, even taking pictures of all corners of the aircraft carrier. This move has attracted widespread attention, and it is difficult to understand why the US military is so helpless in this technological showdown. Right now, we're no longer seeing eagles hovering in the blue sky, but rats running wild under the cat's nose.
Why is the US military so weak in the face of Iran?Is this a true portrayal of the decline in the strength of the U.S. ** team, or is there a deeper consideration hidden in it?Perhaps, this is not only a military confrontation, but also a microcosm of an international game.
Aircraft carrier weakness: a portrayal of the current situation of the United States.
American aircraft carriers used to be the hegemon of the world's navies, and their existence not only represents military strength, but also political and economic symbols. However, in recent years, American aircraft carriers seem to have appeared somewhat inactive and even somewhat weak in a number of situations. In the Persian Gulf, Iranian drones and speedboats challenged U.S. aircraft carriers, while the U.S. military behaved indecisively and helplessly.
This phenomenon has raised concerns about the current state of affairs in the United States. On the one hand, this may reflect the actual situation of the United States, and it may be the lag of armament technology or the lack of military training. On the other hand, this may also be a performance of the United States in some kind of international political game, deliberately showing weakness in order to achieve a certain strategic goal.
Military games in the Persian Gulf: part of international politics.
When the U.S. aircraft carrier entered the Persian Gulf and Iran's speedboats approached, the U.S. military's response was surprising. They chose to move closer to the coastline on the other side of the Persian Gulf, quickly moving away from the Iranian coastline. This series of abnormal operations makes people wonder what the US aircraft carrier came to the Persian Gulf for
Perhaps, this is to put pressure on Iran at the political and military level. The United States does not want to escalate the situation and simply demonstrate a military presence in the region to achieve its political and military objectives. However, this seems to be contrary to the consistent hegemonic posture of the United States. In the international political game, the United States may choose more of a "town game" and achieve a certain political goal by showing weakness.
American Weakness: Is It Real or Political Performance?
In this "town" strategy, US aircraft carriers may be more of a direct deterrent to Iranian aircraft carriers. To show up in the Persian Gulf is to exert the most direct pressure on Iran. However, the U.S. military appears to have responded less forcefully to these petty fights, perhaps out of fear of escalation.
The provocation of Iranian drones and speedboats is actually an ingenious ** war. Through these actions, Iran seeks to reveal the two sides of US hegemony. In this performance of "obeying words," the weakness of the United States may not be incompetent, but a strategic choice. However, this choice has sparked more controversy on the international stage.
Chinese netizen comments: The aircraft carrier is weak, reflecting the plight of the superpower.
Chinese netizens also have different opinions on the incident. Some people believe that it is a wise choice for the United States to overcome rigidity with softness and maintain global stability by avoiding escalating conflictsOthers accuse the United States of weakness and believe that it should respond decisively to the challenge in order to maintain its image as a superpower.
This incident not only affects the image of the United States in the Persian Gulf, but also affects global concern. As a superpower, every choice the United States makes carries the expectations of the country and the international community. And when America's choices are controversial, the uncertainty about the future becomes even more apparent.
Conclusion: The responsibilities and contradictions of superpowers.
The strategic choice of the United States, whether it is aware that the situation is not yet suitable for war, or in order to maintain international stability, has had far-reaching international implications. On the one hand, this strategy of avoiding war may help reduce regional tensions and create space for a peaceful solution. On the other hand, it could also be seen as a sign of weakness and compromise in the United States, making other countries more emboldened to challenge American authority.
As a superpower, the behavior of the United States is not only a matter of domestic politics and ***, but also an impact on global peace and order. In this regard, the United States must not only fulfill its responsibilities as a superpower, but also face the challenge of internal and external contradictions. The choice in the Persian Gulf has also made other countries re-examine their contributions and commitments to the international order.
The international community's criticism of the United States for its weakness or evasion may be a question of the superpower's responsibility. Superpowers undoubtedly enjoy influence in global affairs, but this also means that they need to take a firm stand in times of crisis in order to stabilize the international landscape. In this regard, the controversy over the strategic choices of the United States will continue to shape the course of international relations.
Amid future uncertainty, the United States may need to re-examine its position on global affairs and adjust its strategy to better respond to international challenges. In today's globalized world, the role of the superpower is no longer just a matter of independence and independence, but also a member of the international community. America's strategic choices, whether at peace or head-on, will have far-reaching implications in future international affairs. In this ever-changing international arena, the balance between the roles and responsibilities of the superpowers will become an eternal topic in international relations.
Chinese look at the "weakness" of the United States in the Persian Gulf: instigation or high tricks?
Hey, did you hear that?The U.S. aircraft carrier ran into some trouble in the Persian Gulf and was overwhelmed by Iranian drones and speedboats. This scene makes us onlookers a little unpredictable, what happened to the US military?
First of all, it must be said that in the past, the US aircraft carrier was an inviolable existence, symbolizing great military strength. But this time, the Iranian little thing dared to dangle on its head, and the painting style was a little wrong.
Chinese aunts are talking in WeChat groups: "Look at the United States, it's really getting worse and worse." "Some people say that the U.S. military has taken the wrong medicine, what's going on?Someone simply deducted a "soft persimmon" hat for the US ** team.
In fact, we also have to admit that the United States is indeed a little soft this time, and it is not as dragged as before. The aircraft carrier was overwhelmed by Iranian gadgets, and it was simply the rhythm of "a tiger being bullied by a pack of dogs".
But then again, is this really not good for the US military?Or is it deliberate?Some people speculate that the United States may want to show weakness and not want to set fire in this small place. We all know that the United States does not want to make any big moves now, especially in the Middle East, and playing with fire is not a good thing.
In the eyes of the Chinese, this weakness of the United States is a bit of a trick. Maybe they're smart and don't want to make a big news, make things complicated, and in the end they won't be able to end it themselves. Anyway, we Chinese are not vegetarians, and we are not afraid of anyone.
Some netizens commented: "The United States is not cowardice now, but wants to solve the problem in a more advanced way." Don't look at them softly, maybe the next step is for Iran to apologize to them itself. "Haha, this is a new routine.
Of course, there are also people who feel that the United States is too embarrassed to do this, and everyone is disappointed. After all, I always looked at them before, why are they so cowardly this time?Some people wonder if the United States is really not good, and even their armament technology is inferior to that of Iran.
However, we Chinese are also sensible and will not blindly black the United States. After all, they are also superpowers, and who can guarantee that they will perform so well every time?
In general, the "cowardice" of the United States in the Persian Gulf this time has caused a lot of thought. Is it true that the wrestling between the major powers in the future does not necessarily have to be hard-hitting?Perhaps, being soft and smart is the real trick.
On the international stage, the game between the superpowers is not something that we, the onlookers, can fully see through. The United States has softened this time, whether it is really soft, or whether it has engaged in some kind of tricks, we can only guess. However, we Chinese have always watched the excitement and not think it was a big deal, perhaps we should take a good look at this international drama between "soft persimmons" and "smart tricks", and see what kind of road we China will take in this competition.