Recently,Understand Che DiHeld a hybrid model in severe cold conditions with an all-electric rangeAchievement ratetests, the results of which were published caused huge controversy. Many car companies are rightUnderstand Che DiThe test method was not recognized, especially by those car companies that did not perform well in the test, and even more disputed the results. HuaweiYu Chengdongeven posted that this was a trick test to mislead the public. In this controversy,Great Wall MotorswithGeelyCarsand other relevant high-level are also rightUnderstand Che DiThe test results are questioned. Due toHuaweiInvolved in it, the reaction of netizens was also very fierce, and some even thought that it was rightHuaweiof deliberate smearing.
In the face of doubts from the whole network,Understand Che Didid not apologize, but announced that a winter test would be conducted on December 14, and it would be broadcast live, and car companies and ** were invited to participate in the witness. In this test, under the same test conditions,BYDRanked first, with a battery life of 655 km, enduranceAchievement ratefor 528%；HuaweiAsked the world ranked second to last, only running 106 km, enduranceAchievement rateOnly 6%;Lynk & Co 08The worst performer, running only 65 km, enduranceAchievement rateOnly 3 per cent. This test result is the same as beforeUnderstand Che DiThe results of the winter test are basically the same, and there is no cheating or deliberately smearing a brand.
However, whyHuaweiYu ChengdongAre you so unhappy with the results?Actually, it's because the test results are on the question lineCarsNot friendly enough. I believe that if you ask the boundaryCarsRanked number one,Yu ChengdongThere will certainly be no such reaction. For someone to sayUnderstand Che DiThe test method is self-created and does not conform to the international mainstream test procedures, and my personal opinion is that as long as it is guaranteed to be under the same test conditions, it does not matter whether the test method is consistent with the mainstream method. It's important that everyone tests under the same conditions, so why do some cars perform well under non-compliant test conditions, while others don'tIn addition, the actual driving conditions are variable, which greatly tests the vehicle's adaptability. Consumers do have the right to know which cars are differentenvironmentis the most adaptable.
In addition,Understand Che DiThe winter test also accidentally exposed an important fact, namelyElectric carsAmazing attenuation of endurance in extremely cold weather. Although, for the most partenvironmentTemperatures are impossible to reachUnderstand Che Ditested at the time of the level, but this does alert the consumer before purchasingElectric carsshould be more cautious, especially friends in the northern region, should do their homework in advance to avoid regretting choosing a vehicle that is not suitable for the conditions.
Overall, I hope that there will be more extreme weather tests like this. As long as there are institutions willing to conduct tests, it will attract heat and attention, thus prompting car companies to really pay attention to this issue. Only in this way can the entire industry develop healthily. On the contrary, if everyone doesn't care, it gives car companies room to "cut corners". Do you agree with this view?
Recently,Understand Che DiHeld a meeting in severe cold conditions for hybrid models with all-electric rangeAchievement rateActivities to conduct tests. However, the announcement of the test results caused a great deal of controversy.
The biggest controversy in this test is that the car companies are rightUnderstand Che Diof the test method, especially those car companies that did not perform well in the test. HuaweiYu Chengdongeven posted that this is a "pit test" to mislead the public. Great Wall MotorsGeelyCarsetcCarsThe company's top brass is right, tooUnderstand Che DiThe test results were disputed. Due toHuaweiThe impact of this controversy has even extended to netizens, and some have also accused it of being rightHuaweiof deliberate smearing.
In the face of many doubts,Understand Che Didid not apologize, but announced that it would conduct the winter test again on December 14, and it was also planned to conduct a live broadcast, inviting car companies and ** to participate in witnessing. In this test,BYDWith 65The endurance of 5 km ranked firstHuaweiThe world only ran 106 km, enduranceAchievement rateOnly 6%, ranking second to last. Lynk & Co 08The worst performance was the same, running only 65 km, enduranceAchievement rateOnly 3%. The results of this test are basically consistent with the results of the previous winter tests, and no cheating or deliberate smearing was found.
However, whyHuaweiYu ChengdongAre you so unhappy with the results?Actually, it's because the test results are rightHuaweiof the questionCarsIt's not friendly. I believe that if you ask the boundaryCarsRanked number one,Yu ChengdongThere will certainly be no such reaction.
Some claimUnderstand Che DiThe test method is self-created and does not conform to the international mainstream test procedures. Personally, I don't think it matters if the test method is consistent with the mainstream method as long as it is ensured under the same test conditions. It's important that everyone tests under the same conditions, so why do some cars perform well in non-compliant test conditions, while others don'tAt the same time, the reality of driving conditions is changeable, which tests the "adaptability" of the vehicle very much. Consumers certainly have the right to know which vehicles are differentenvironmentis the most adaptable.
In addition,Understand Che DiThe winter tests also exposed an important fact, namelyElectric carsAmazing attenuation of endurance in extremely cold weather. Although, for the most partenvironmentTemperatures are impossible to reachUnderstand Che Ditested at the time of the level, but this does alert the consumer before purchasingElectric carsConsumers in northern regions should do their homework in advance and avoid choosing vehicles that are not suitable for the conditions.
Overall, hopefully there will be more extreme weather tests like this. As long as there are institutions willing to conduct tests, they can generate heat and attention, letCarsManufacturing companies are really concerned about this issue and promote the healthy development of the entire industry. On the contrary, if everyone doesn't care, they will do itCarsManufacturing companies offer room to "cut corners". Do you think this view is correct?
Recently,Understand Che DiAn all-electric endurance in severe cold conditions was heldAchievement ratetest, but the publication of the test results caused a huge controversy.
In this test, many car companies are rightUnderstand Che DiIn particular, some car companies that did not perform well in the test objected to the results. HuaweiYu Chengdongeven posted that the test was a trick test to mislead the publicGreat Wall MotorsGeelyCarsand other high-level executives of car companies are also rightUnderstand Che DiThe results are questioned. Due toHuaweiThe controversy also provoked a fierce reaction from netizens, with some even accusing it of being rightHuaweiof deliberate smearing.
Despite the skepticism of the whole network,Understand Che Didid not apologize, but announced that it would conduct the winter test again on December 14, and planned to conduct a live broadcast, inviting car companies and ** to witness together. And the results of this test show that under the same test conditions,BYDThe battery life was the best, reaching 655 km, enduranceAchievement ratefor 528%；HuaweiAsked the world ranked second to last, only running 106 km, enduranceAchievement rateOnly 6%;Lynk & Co 08The worst performance was the same, running only 65 km, enduranceAchievement rateOnly 3%. This result is the same as beforeUnderstand Che DiThe results of the winter test were basically consistent, and no improper behavior or deliberate smearing of any brand was found.
Well, whyHuaweiYu ChengdongAre you so unhappy with the results?Actually, it's because the test results are rightHuaweiAsk the boundaryCarsIt's not friendly enough. I believe that if you ask the boundaryCarsRanked number one,Yu ChengdongThere will certainly be no such reaction.
Some claimedUnderstand Che DiThe test method is self-created and does not conform to the international mainstream test procedures. Personally, however, I don't think it matters whether the test method is consistent with the mainstream method, as long as it is guaranteed to be under the same test conditions. It's important that everyone tests under the same conditions, so why do some cars perform well in non-compliant test conditions and others don't?At the same time, the actual driving conditions are variable, which will greatly test the vehicle's adaptability. Consumers certainly have the right to know which cars are differentenvironmentis the most adaptable.
In addition,Understand Che DiThe winter test also unexpectedly revealed an important fact, namelyElectric carsAmazing attenuation of endurance in extremely cold weather. Although most of the timeenvironmentThe temperature is impossible to reachUnderstand Che DiThe level of cold at the time of testing, but this still reminds consumers when buyingElectric carsshould be more cautious, especially for consumers in the north. Do your homework and avoid buying vehicles that don't fit the conditions.
Overall, hopefully there will be more extreme weather tests like this. As long as there are institutions willing to test, it can generate heat and attention to promote itCarsManufacturing companies really care about this issue and promote the healthy development of the entire industry. On the contrary, if everyone doesn't care, they will giveCarsManufacturing companies offer room to "cut corners". What do you think of this view?