Title:
The military plane was broken!Is the F-16 really a malfunction or a dereliction of duty on the part of the nurse?
On December 11, the F-16 fighter plane crashed, and the news made everyone buzz. Although the pilot survived, this accident made people start to think, what happened to the F-16?Is it a real physical problem or is there something else hidden?
First, let's look at the recent series of accidents. For example, on April 6 this year, the Black Hawk of the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force crashed in the Miyako Sea, killing all eight senior officers. Then, just two days later, on April 8, two F-16 fighters of the U.S. military stationed in South Korea made an emergency landing at a civilian airfield on Miyakojima, Japan, due to a sudden failure of one of them. On November 29, an Osprey of the US military stationed in Japan crashed, and two of the six US soldiers on board were two dead and four missing. The osprey was supposed to go to the Kadena base, but it ended up crashing into a mess in the waters off Yakushima. Is it a coincidence that these accidents all coincided with "Miyakojima"?
However, if we change the keyword to "F-16", the situation changes. The action suspense blockbuster style that everyone originally guessed about such as the great power game and the fight under the water has disappeared. We are left with a simple and straightforward question: the F-16 is purely physical, right?
What is even more puzzling is the incident of May 6 this year. An F-16 of the US military stationed in South Korea crashed during training, and on July 10, another F-16 found an abnormality and made an emergency landing at Aomori Airport. But what is even more bizarre is an accident in November 2021. An F-16 of the US military stationed in Japan suddenly broke down during the flight, and in order to avoid the plane being destroyed and killed, the pilot actually resolutely threw the fuel tank on the ground, throwing two while flying. Then he made a forced landing at Aomori Airport. But the problem is that there are ordinary residential areas in Aomori below, which is equivalent to "raining gasoline tanks" on the ground houses and civilians. Aomori Airport is a civilian airport. This time, it is no less than giving Japan ** a slap in the face. Although Japan has always been obedient to the United States, this time it was too much to hit the face, and it stubbornly demanded that the US military temporarily ground the F-16. The result?Two days after the accident, the F-16 came out and flew again. What kind of attitude do you say?
Now another F-16 of the US military stationed in South Korea has fallen, plus various previous accidents, do you think this is a problem with the F-16?Netizens made up too many blockbuster plots before, thinking that F-16 should be super powerful, but at first glance, it was just a candidate in an ordinary class who got its normal score. Regardless of whether it is a true scholar or not, the future sales of the F-16 will have to stand aside.
However, we cannot simply blame the F-16 itself for the problem. Perhaps this is just the tip of the iceberg, and the reasons behind it are more complex. Looking at this series of events, it is not difficult to see that Miyakojima seems to have become a "cursed place", closely linked to various aircraft accidents. Is it a matter of geographical location?Or is it a frequent failure caused by environmental conditions?
And the attitude of the US military in Japan is also worrying. In the case of the Aomori Airport incident, the pilot's decision not only threatened the inhabitants on the ground, but also put tremendous pressure on Japan**. The US military's disregard for the safety of the locals has aroused a lot of dissatisfaction and doubts. This begs the question, as allies, can we be adequately protected and respected at critical moments?
In general, the problem of frequent failures of the F-16 fighter can be related both to a flaw in the design of the airframe and to a failure in maintenance. And the Miyakojima elements in various events and the indifferent attitude towards Japan ** make the whole issue even more confusing. In this context, we should not only look at the failure of the F-16, but also look at the behavior of the US military in front of its allies, and where we are in all this.
Taken together, the F-16 fighter has been malfunctioning, and the series of incidents it has triggered are deeply involved. We cannot simply shift the blame to the airframe itself, but need to pay more attention to the reasons behind it and the attitude of the US military in the process. Perhaps, all of this is a complex puzzle, and we need more information and explanations to restore the truth. After all, it's about our security and trust among our allies, and we can't take it lightly. Perhaps while pursuing flight altitude, we should also be more cautious and ensure that every flight is safe, not only to the pilot, but also to the surrounding community.