1. The mystery of entrepreneurial computing is revealed.
Recently, a post-95 couple set up a stall to sell snacks, and the news of a turnover of 9,000 yuan caused an uproar on the Internet. Some netizens calculated the daily work of the couple according to news reports, pointing out that it takes 5 to peel 500 catties of potatoes25 hours, and one day is not enough time to complete tasks such as peeling and processing tofu. However, this seemingly accurate calculation has been criticized for being flawed.
2. Challenging the routine of hard work.
Critics questioned the journalist's lack of life experience, arguing that processing 500 pounds of potatoes was unbearable for ordinary people. However, through some examples, we can see the hard work of some people in extreme environments. For example, Taishan mountain pickers have to go up and down three times a day, carrying 120 catties of mineral water on their shouldersStevedores load 12 tons of ketchup neatly into containers in half a day. These examples show us that just because we can't imagine something doesn't mean others can't do it.
3. **Reversal, the truth is revealed.
After the news spread of the daily income of 9,000 yuan for young couples, the ** orientation began to reverse. First of all, someone revealed that the daily turnover of the young couple did exceed 9,000 yuan, and the CCTV report was not fictional. But this is only turnover, not actual income, considering the cost of raw materials, rent, labor and other costs, the actual income is within the normal range, not the astronomical amount calculated by some netizens.
Second, critics point out that husband and wife are not the only ones who hire helpers. **There are 4 people in overalls. Therefore, the processing of 500 catties of potatoes and 250 catties of tofu is not difficult, and there is no so-called situation where you can't be busy.
4. In-depth analysis: the intent behind the network.
Regarding the recent frequent incidents against the official media, some people pointed out that there may be people with ulterior motives behind the scenes. CCTV hair **, the stall economy, etc. have been questioned, causing people to think, is all this normal?Analysts point out that these critics are not representatives of the general population, but radicals who spread inappropriate rhetoric. They try to use social contradictions to make a mess of the people, confuse the public, and achieve ulterior motives.
5. Stay awake at all times.
The country is undergoing unprecedented changes, and while the economy is developing rapidly, it has also exposed some problems, such as the widening gap between the rich and the poor, employment problems, and corruption. However, we should understand that the state has been working hard to improve these problems. Individual negative events should not negate the overall effort. We must remain sober and be vigilant against those who try to take advantage of social contradictions to create chaos.
VI. Conclusion. In the end, all we see is an ordinary little couple, working hard to earn living expenses through hard-working hands. This seemingly trivial matter has been artificially exaggerated and caused senseless controversy. In this information age, we need to look at the news rationally and not be swayed by one-sided words. Only by staying sober and discerning between right and wrong can we better understand the truth of social change.
This article provides an in-depth analysis of the controversy caused by a small couple starting a business on a street stall, revealing the reversal of ** and the underlying motives behind the network. The author shows the efforts and hard work of some people in extreme circumstances by citing some real-life examples to refute the doubts about the workload of young couples. The article strives to restore the truth and emphasizes the importance of looking at the news rationally.
First of all, in the process of starting a business in a small couple's stall, the article put forward a reasonable refutation to some netizens' doubts about their workload. Through examples such as Tarzan pickers and stevedores, the article conveys an important message that some things may seem beyond our knowledge, but it does not mean that others cannot do them. This thought-provoking approach is instructive and helps us understand why some people question the work of young couples.
Secondly, the article makes a profound analysis of the phenomenon of reversal. By revealing the actual turnover and income of the young couple, the article expresses support for the CCTV report, while criticizing those who try to sow chaos by spreading negative information. This analysis of the motivations behind the network gives a clearer understanding of the authenticity of the information and the intent behind it. This also reminds us to keep a cool head and not be swayed by momentary emotions when facing online information.
Finally, the article emphasizes that while the country's economic development is not only happening, but also some social problems, such as the gap between the rich and the poor, and employment problems. The author believes that the overall national effort should not be negated because of individual negative events, and calls on readers to remain sober and distinguish between right and wrong. This stance not only expresses confidence in nation-building, but also reminds us to be justified in our criticism, and not to be swayed by individual events.
Overall, in the process of analyzing the theme of the article, this review rationally and objectively expresses the author's views on the entrepreneurial events of young couples. By citing examples and dissecting the phenomenon, the article enables readers to understand the truth more comprehensively and think more deeply about the information when thinking about this event. In today's era of information overflow, such comments have a positive effect on guiding readers to view the news correctly and keep a clear head.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!