Since ancient times, cheating has been endless. There are such unknown methods in various fields in history, and Mr. Nan Guo in the Book of Jin has become a story that people talk about with his unbelievable cheating methods. However, the cost of cheating in ancient scientific expeditions was far from a simple laugh, especially in the Qing Dynasty, where even a high-ranking official could die as a result.
King Qi Xuan appreciates the music, but Mr. Nan Guo is a person who doesn't know how to play the flute at all. With his superb shaking his head, he mingled among 300 musicians until King Xinqi succeeded to the throne. Compared with the scientific examination of the country to select talents in later generations, Mr. Nan Guo may be considered lucky, not beheaded, but chose to flee.
The ancient imperial examination system, similar to today's college entrance examination, was actually more like a challenge of "thousands of troops crossing a single-plank bridge". The imperial examination system began in the Sui Dynasty, took shape in the Tang Dynasty, and reached its peak in the Ming and Qing dynasties. The literati group of the Ming Dynasty relied on the strength of the imperial examination to gather and advance the career of scholars. However, unlike the college entrance examination, those who are selected through the imperial examination can only enter the official career, and the examination is more difficult. During the 276 years of the Ming Dynasty, there were only 24,636 jinshi, and the competition was fierce, which made some people have a fluke mentality and try to gain fame and fame through cheating in exchange for wealth.
There are three main ways to cheat in the imperial examination in ancient times: having a good relationship with the examiner, entrusting a cheat sheet, and asking someone to take the exam on your behalf. There is no shortage of penalties for these cheats, and those involved may lose their heads.
Taking the Qing Dynasty as an example, once cheating in the imperial examination was discovered, it was severely punished. In the three major fraud cases in the Qing Dynasty, the punishment of the lifter and the examiner was almost always the end of the head. Among them, the "Wuwu Kechang Case" is even rarer, involving the death sentence of a first-class official.
It was rare for a member of the rank to be sentenced to death in the Qing Dynasty, because such figures were usually not idle people, and the emperor did not have to put them to death unless they were involved in rebellion. Bai Jun (Bai Ye) is an example, he was a six-year jinshi of Daoguang, who once managed the three libraries of the imperial court, shared the worries of the people, and was known as "Su Zhizheng". However, he was involved in a cheating case on a scientific expedition, which led to a death sentence.
The specific case occurred in the eighth year of Xianfeng, when a scumbag Luo Hongci participated in the Shuntianfu Township Examination, and successfully entered the list of his bad essays by bribing the examiner and his family. However, the move was eventually exposed, and Bai Jun and the other examiners were implicated. According to the regulations of the imperial examination in the Qing Dynasty, Bai Jun was finally sentenced to death.
Bai Jun's nemesis, Su Shun, insisted on handling the case impartially in order to clean up the culture of scientific research. Emperor Xianfeng also hated this, but finally decided to behead Bai Jun to warn future generations. Even a prime minister-level figure was not spared in the end.
This case makes people think about the high cost of cheating in ancient scientific expeditions. Bai Jun's death not only ended his life, but also became the highest-ranking person who died in the scientific examination cheating case in the history of the Qing Dynasty for hundreds of years. For the society at that time, this was an attempt to reorganize the rule of officials, and it was also a severe punishment for cheating in the field.
Overall, the seriousness of cheating in ancient scientific research can be seen. Candidates had to choose between the desire to achieve fame and the strict regulations. This history not only shows us the cruel side of the ancient examination system, but also makes us reflect on whether the selection mechanism in contemporary society also needs to be deeply reflected.
This article vividly depicts the serious consequences of cheating in ancient scientific examinations, taking the case of Bai Jun, a member of the first rank in the Qing Dynasty, as an example, which profoundly reflects the zero-tolerance attitude of the society at that time towards cheating in the scientific field. While commenting on this article, I think there are several aspects that are worth focusing on.
First of all, the article introduces the phenomenon of cheating in ancient times through the story of Mr. Nan Guo, and lays out the historical background of cheating in ancient scientific research for readers. This technique makes the article more lively and interesting, and attracts readers to read it in depth. Mr. Nan Guo's example shows that cheaters can exist in all fields, laying the foundation for the cases that follow.
Secondly, through the cases of fraud in the Qing Dynasty, especially the case of Bai Jun, this paper deeply analyzes the extremely serious consequences faced by cheaters in ancient scientific examinations. As a prime minister-level figure, Bai Jun's final beheading not only reflects the Qing Dynasty's zero tolerance for cheating in the scientific field, but also shows that there is no special treatment in front of the law. This point has positive implications for safeguarding social justice and cracking down on corruption.
However, it is worth reflecting on whether this extreme punishment for cheating can really be effective in curbing cheatingIn a case like Bai Jun's, it can be seen that Emperor Xianfeng finally chose to be beheaded in order to preserve the talent of a prime minister-level figure. Although this practice conveys a serious attitude towards the rule of law to society, it also raises questions about judicial fairness. Society needs to think deeply about how to balance the severe punishment of cheating with the protection of individual talents.
In addition, the article also mentions the three main methods of cheating in ancient scientific examinations: communicating with the examiner, entouraging ** cheat sheets, and asking someone to take the test on behalf of them. It is worth thinking about whether these methods still exist in today's society and provide some enlightenment for our modern examination system.
Overall, this article shows readers the serious consequences of cheating in ancient scientific expeditions through vivid descriptions and insightful case studies. However, in dealing with the problem of cheating, we also need to think about how to deal with similar cases more reasonably and flexibly while maintaining fairness and justice, so as to build a more just and sustainable social system.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!