Under the drastic changes in history, ** and a peasant ** disputes.
In the historical process of China's reform and opening up, the well-known *** plays a pivotal role. However, the reform and opening up he implemented after 1978 was not all smooth sailing, and in the face of a challenge from an illiterate peasant**, his political wisdom and decision-making were tested unprecedentedly.
This farmer **, named ***, has an extraordinary background. Born in 1914, he experienced famine and suffering in that difficult era, but found a glimmer of life in Dazhai Village. **With a unique insight into agriculture, he has solved the problem of food and clothing for the local people in grassroots work and created a considerable surplus of food. This performance and background led him to become deputy prime minister in 1975, which is rare for an illiterate person.
However, just when the country needs stable development, there are serious doubts about the policy of ***. His opposition is not unfounded, but stems from loyalty to *** and the idea of "two whatevers". This runs counter to the reform line of *** and has caused a political storm.
Although *** was praised by *** and ***, in 1977, he not only privately found *** to express his opposition, but also directly confronted *** argumentative position. In the shadow of "two whatevers", he hinted that *** should never return to work. ”
It was not until 1978 that after the Third Plenary Session of the 11th Central Committee, it made a comprehensive comeback and promoted reform and opening up into a new historical period. He continued to formulate policies and focus on building the nation. However, ** is still critical of this, questioning whether *** adheres to ***'s ideological line.
** Unique identities and mindsets seem out of place in the upper echelons of politics. Although he jumped from a peasant to a vice premier, his ideas were out of touch with the development of the times, and it was difficult for him to adapt to the progress of New China. Some people pointed out that he had two major flaws: superficial thinking about problems and reluctance to accept new things.
In general, although there are reasons for the opposition, it may be more suitable to continue to play a role at the grassroots level under the changes of the new era. The political confrontation between him and *** became a unique chapter in the history of China's reform and opening up, and also highlighted the conflict of different thinking and ideas under the political pattern at that time.
This article outlines a very special political showdown in Chinese history, showing the collision of different ideas and backgrounds between *** and ***. This kind of collision is not only a conflict of personal concepts, but also an ideological contest between people from different strata and backgrounds under the changes of the times.
First of all, the article mentions the historical status of reform and opening up. He was the backbone of China's reforms, driving the country's economic rise. However, **as an illiterate farmer**, represents the views and positions of ordinary people. His opposition to *** is not blind, but stems from the adherence to *** and old ideas. Such confrontations have not been common in history, as conflicts of opinion between senior leaders and grassroots representatives are rarely amplified.
The showdown highlighted the complexity of Chinese society at the time. As a leader from the grassroots, his views represent the voices of the people at the bottom. His questioning of the *** policy may have represented the worries and uneasiness of some people at the time. This perspective reminds us that the voices of different strata and regions need to be taken into account in policy-making, especially the opinions of the grassroots.
The article also highlights the special identity of ***. As an illiterate farmer, he was recognized for his achievements in agricultural development and was promoted to vice premier. However, his resistance to new ideas and his adherence to the ideas of *** led to an antagonism with ***. This raises the point of deep reflection that a person's achievements and background do not always determine their acceptance of the changes of the times, and that sometimes the constraints of conventional wisdom can become an obstacle.
Finally, the article mentions ***'s resistance to new things and the defect of not thinking deeply enough. This analysis gives the reader a deeper reflection on the competence and literacy of political leaders. A leader needs not only background and experience, but also flexible thinking and receptivity to new ideas.
Overall, the essay presents a political showdown rarely seen in Chinese political history. The ideological conflict between ** and *** represents the collision of ideas between people from different strata and different backgrounds in the changes of the times, which is worthy of in-depth thinking and research.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!