At the tense moment when the 2023 college entrance examination is about to be ushered in, looking back on an intriguing story in 2020, Bai Xiangling, the champion of Jiangsu Province, was inexplicably rejected by Tsinghua University and Peking University, but it attracted the eager pursuit of the University of Hong Kong. The story behind it makes people think about the "ingenuity" of China's college entrance examination system and why the University of Hong Kong is particularly fond of her.
There are only 3 days left before the countdown to the 2023 college entrance examination, and colleges and universities around the country are already gearing up to welcome the new batch of outstanding students. However, Bai Xiangling, the champion of the Jiangsu Provincial College Entrance Examination in 2020, encountered an unexpected "cold reception" on the admission notice. She obviously got the highest score in the province, why did she not get into first-class universities such as Tsinghua University and Peking University?
Bai Xiangling was born in Huai'an, Jiangsu, and won the first place in the liberal arts of the college entrance examination in Jiangsu Province, scoring an astonishing 430 points out of 480. However, she was confused by the newly reformed college entrance examination system in Jiangsu Province, and was not sure whether she could enter the ranks of prestigious schools such as Tsinghua University and Peking University. This system reform emphasizes language quality education, mathematics empowers various industries, and English is in line with international standards, but it has caused a lot of controversy.
Bai Xiangling originally regarded Nanjing University as her ideal university, but her extraordinary performance in the college entrance examination changed her choice. Before the results of the college entrance examination are announced, the champion usually receives admissions from prestigious schools**, but Bai Xiangling fell into a long wait. Eventually, she reluctantly turned her attention to other schools, but the results were still disappointing.
Jiangsu Province's college entrance examination system is unique, as early as 2008, it proposed the initiative of physical chemistry without scores. Although it has brought economic development to Jiangsu Province in a short period of time, it has also caused problems such as employment difficulties for college students and students' lack of interest in Xi. In 2018, the Jiangsu Provincial Education Bureau launched a new college entrance examination model, which sparked widespread thinking and controversy.
This new model requires students to choose three major subjects, one in history or physics, and two in politics and geography. This system is too harsh for students who are good at minor subjects. Bai Xiangling chose history and politics, but because her history score was slightly lower than the requirement, she could not be selected in Qingbei University.
Not only that, Bai Xiangling's college entrance examination results have also been restricted by regions. Tsinghua University, Peking University and other first-class universities have set "shrinking" standards for the special college entrance examination system in Jiangsu Province, and the strict admission requirements make Bai Xiangling unable to enter this ranks. At the same time, other universities have rejected her applications because they are not comfortable with the "new education system".
Could it be that Bai Xiangling, the top student with a high score of 430 points in language and mathematics, can only study in two ordinary colleges?After trying to understand the admissions guidelines of each school, her pride has been completely crushed by reality. From being the pride of the sky to being hit by everything, she chose to retreat to the next best thing and moved closer to 985 universities, but it was still fruitless.
Bai Xiangling's experience has aroused widespread concern in the society and also sparked heated discussions on the Internet. People have called on colleges and universities to be more flexible in recruiting students, not to rest on their laurels, and to have more special recruitment standards for talents. In this Internet age, everyone has a platform to express their opinions, and Bai Xiangling's story has also become an opportunity for people to think about China's college entrance examination system.
It is worth noting that the University of Hong Kong actually expressed strong interest in Bai Xiangling, and even provided a special treatment of 1 million scholarships. This has aroused people's curiosity, why the University of Hong Kong is so favored by Bai Xiangling?Does this mean that the definition of talent at the University of Hong Kong is different from that of the Mainland?
Bai Xiangling's story may be just a microcosm of the huge machine of the college entrance examination system. In this era of "generals from the short", the matching of partial subjects and overall scores is becoming more and more important. For Bai Xiangling, maybe she is not not good enough, but in the fiercely competitive battlefield of the college entrance examination, her light is buried in many contradictions and rules.
The University of Hong Kong's favor may have given Bai Xiangling new hope, and it also reminded us to think more carefully about the admissions standards of universities. In this era of diversity and innovation, should colleges and universities pay more attention to students' personalities and strengths, rather than just sticking to traditional college entrance examination scores?
Bai Xiangling's experience may become a catalyst for the reform of the college entrance examination system, and let us all look forward to a more fair and reasonable higher education system.
Bai Xiangling's story is like a thought-provoking realistic version of tragicomedy, which makes people reflect on China's college entrance examination system. As the champion of the college entrance examination in Jiangsu Province, she was finally rejected by Tsinghua University and Peking University because of the change of the new college entrance examination system, which is embarrassing.
The college entrance examination has always been a watershed moment in the fate of Chinese students, and Bai Xiangling's experience highlights the huge impact of institutional change on students. The "new college entrance examination model" implemented by Jiangsu Province attempts to cultivate talents needed for economic development point-to-point, but it has caused a series of problems in practice. This system has a profound impact on the choice and development of students, and also highlights the complexity of the college entrance examination system.
The problem faced by Bai Xiangling is not only the problem of scores, but also involves the differential standards and regional differences in college admissions. Tsinghua University and Peking University have set stricter admission requirements for the top students in Jiangsu Province, which makes it difficult to obtain admission qualifications even if they are the first in the province. This kind of differentiated admission standard has aroused widespread concern in the society, and has also raised questions about the admission mechanism of colleges and universities.
At the same time, Bai Xiangling's experience also reveals the impact of different subject preferences among universities on students. Although her high score is the best in the province, in the eyes of Peking University, she cannot meet the admission criteria because she chose the two minor subjects of history and politics in the "model". This has led people to think about whether more attention should be paid to the development of students' personalities and specialties while pursuing all-round qualities.
What's even more gratifying is that the University of Hong Kong has expressed strong interest in Bai Xiangling, and even provided a special treatment of 1 million scholarships. This is not only a personal recognition of her, but also a demonstration of the importance that HKU attaches to the diverse development and personality of its students. This contrast raises the question of whether mainland universities should be more flexible in their approach to student diversity and give them more choices and opportunities.
Bai Xiangling's story has sparked widespread attention and discussion on the Internet, and people have expressed their sympathy and support for her. This also reflects the public's dissatisfaction and expectations for the college entrance examination system. In this information age, everyone has the right to express their opinions and be able to speak out through Internet platforms. This power of public discussion may be a way to promote the reform of the college entrance examination system, so that more people can pay attention to and participate in the construction of the education system.
Overall, Bai Xiangling's experience is a microcosm of China's college entrance examination system, and it is also a revelation. While pursuing fairness, we need to pay more attention to the cultivation of students' personalities, and be more flexible in dealing with subject preferences and admission standards. Only in this way can we truly establish a dynamic higher education system that conforms to the trend of the times.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!