Argentina's new ** Milley moved quickly on his first day in office, cutting nine state ministries, but this move was really only a stopgap measure, and instead of really solving the problem of the large state institutions and the inefficiency of the public service, it made the Argentine people feel cheated. This policy change has sparked widespread discussion and criticism. During Milley's campaign, he promised to cut down half of the state institutions to tackle corruption. In reality, however, the reduction of sectors is not a real reduction, but rather the consolidation of some sectors into others, thereby reducing the number of sectors. This approach to "reform" does not really address the size and inefficiency of the institutions, but only superficially fulfills the campaign promises.
(1) On the surface, the reform is disappointing in substance
In practice, however, Milley only integrated some departments into others, only changing their names, and did not really abolish them. For example, the Ministry of Energy and Mining was transferred to the Ministry of Economy, and the Ministry of Social Development, Education, Labour, Women and Culture was integrated into the Ministry of Human Capital. This consolidation has not really reduced the number of departments, but only the number of agencies in name. In essence, the sheer size and inefficiency of the institutions have not really been addressed, but have left the population disappointed and fooled. Such superficial reforms are only a stopgap measure and do not really meet people's expectations.
(2) Insufficient consideration of the consequences of the abolition of institutions
Argentine society has long adhered to a "high welfare" model, which has led to the bloat and inefficiency of state institutions. The government affairs system is inefficient, and a matter often has to be approved by multiple levels of institutions. If these departments are to be abolished on a large scale, the government system will be paralyzed, and people will not be able to conduct their affairs normally. Therefore, Milley must take into account such serious consequences while cutting down the department. However, Milley's reform plan did not give a clear solution, only the integration of the department into other departments, which did not actually solve the problem of the large and inefficient institutions.
(3) The people's dissatisfaction and doubts about Milley
This method of reform has made people feel angry and disappointed, and people have questioned and criticized Milley on social **. They argue that Milley is only rhetorically fulfilling his campaign promises, but in fact not addressing the size and complexity and inefficiency of state institutions. This deception of the population has made people angry and disappointed, and some even think that Milley is just a farce to win votes.
On his first day in office, Milley cut off the superficial reforms of nine major departments that did not actually achieve the desired results, and even aroused public doubts and dissatisfaction with him. This policy change reminds us once again that reform is not just a superficial action, but also requires in-depth thinking and comprehensive consideration. The abolition of departments is only part of the solution to the large and inefficient structure of the institution, and it is more important to improve the operational mechanism and efficiency of the public service system. The dismantling of State institutions requires clear objectives and plans, as well as a well-developed set of supporting measures. ** Attention should be paid to research and understanding the actual situation and functions of various departments in order to better carry out reforms.
In addition, there is a need for communication and transparency in the implementation of reforms, explaining the purpose and consequences of policies to the public, and reducing misunderstandings and doubts. ** reform measures should not be just a piece of paper, but should be a comprehensive reform plan, including policy formulation, implementation and supervision. Only in this way can we truly achieve the efficiency and effectiveness of the best work.
Finally, as ordinary people, we should also maintain the spirit of supervision and criticism, not only to pay attention to the words and deeds of the people, but also to understand the logic and steps behind the policy. Only through the participation and supervision of the whole people can we ensure that the reform behavior of the first country meets the expectations and interests of the people, and truly realize the optimization and upgrading of state institutions.