[**Deng Zhigang Language Studio. Author: Huang Renjie. This number respects the original, public welfare recommendation, if there is any infringement, please leave a message to contact us to delete. 】
Persuade the new theoryHuang Renjie, a senior high school in Changsha Mingde Middle School
Instructor: Min Yang
The gentleman said: You can't learn.
For more than 2,000 years, Gou Zi's "Persuasion of Learning" has been circulated for centuries, exhorting people in the world to study diligently. However, with the rapid development of society and the increasing impetuous atmosphere, the astonishing theory of "learning Xi useless" has been born. As a scholar, I can't help but be full of resentment, how can learning Xi be useless! (Quick to make a point).
And look at the most widely circulated wild saying of this useless theory - "many of the world's rich people are not serious about Xi, and many do not even have the high education level of today's ordinary white-collar workers." Most of the examples cited in this statement are figures such as Bill Gates, Cao Dewang, and Jack Ma. Proponents of this assertion will always say that Bill Gates dropped out of college in his sophomore year before finishing college to start a business; Or emphasize that Ma Yun's university is very ordinary, and he still founded Alibaba...It seems to make sense, but in fact it is full of loopholes. Gates was admitted to Harvard University and dropped out because the school could no longer teach him more computer literacy; Needless to say, Ma Yun himself has performed well in college, has been retained as a teacher, has a keen sense of smell, and takes advantage of the trend to learn Xi super yellow pages knowledge - how can he not learn Xi in the meantime? They have a long-term vision and learn far more Xi than the present world! (Based on the analysis of facts, it is not that you don't learn, but that you learn more and more ahead).
Now that they are refuted, they will move out of a big mountain - the real people and real things around me. They always say, which boss of the ** dropped out of junior high school, started from scratch, and may even not know a few big characters (such as Tao Bihua); And which of his relatives' children went to college and went to graduate school, but he only had a "pitiful" salary of two or three thousand. This argument is even more untenable: although the boss is self-made and has achieved success by getting up early and greedy for darkness by himself, it can only show that he has become rich with hard work, and going to school without a certificate Xi has no role in it; Comparing young people with CEOs who have worked hard for half their lives is even more foolish - how can it be meaningful to compare without conditions? Decades later, who knows that the young relative won't be able to do a great job? Who knows, if the boss learns knowledge, and then relies on his existing talent and luck, will he be bigger and stronger? (This passage of real people and real facts and Ma Yun's analysis in the previous paragraph are easy to coincide, and the clever author staggered the angle, not from the Xi of learning, but from the analysis of comparative conditions, and more on the future or hypothesis.) As soon as the logic is smooth, the text will be smooth)
Seeing that the views are being broken one by one, there must be some supporters who can't help but sacrifice his "big killer - can you eat Xi?" Can I buy groceries by learning math calculus? At first hearing this, you may feel that you are to the point and invulnerable. But we have to point out that learning Xi is not all about use. For thousands of years, China's culture and basic disciplines have developed, and it once led the world. However, China's scientific development has a strong characteristic - research will only be carried out when there is a real need; And the development of Western science has more theoretical aspects – which is one of the reasons why Western science is in the leading position in modern times. Not only the big aspects, but also the small personal aspects. Xi philosophical knowledge is useless in life, but it can improve one's spiritual quality, and music is dispensable in life, but it can cure emotions. Such examples are not the same. (Using comparative arguments, analyzing the uselessness of the time but not the real uselessness, and analyzing the uselessness of what we have learned now, from the largest to the smallest, is actually very useful.) ）
Therefore, when others throw out the "theory of the uselessness of learning Xi we also know their ignorant nature—this is also caused by the lack of learning. (That's the point) If that's the case, why bother talking to him. If you have that time, you might as well learn something, wouldn't you?
Brief comment:
I remember talking about the real essay questions of the college entrance examination related to labor, and the writing of an excellent essay, namelyThe voices of the doubters are broken individually. I wonder if the author was inspired by this? This way of writing is also very clever. Not only are these voices of doubt exactly the reality of the situation, but the author's analysis does not stop at a shallow level, but analyzes as deeply as possible, so that the reader can see the extraordinary points of his insights. The language is clean and powerfulIt's the author's style and a plus.