Recently, the news that the products managed by Gülen have lost 30 billion yuan in five years, and the management fee income is only 3 billion yuan has attracted widespread attention. In this regard, Lin Yuan, chairman of Shenzhen Linyuan Investment, said that this is stipulated in the contract, and the rules are the rules. He believes that before investing, investors should take these regulations into account and it is reasonable to follow the rules. If the regulations are not informed in advance before investing, then there is a problem. At the same time, Lin Yuan believes that now is a good time, if you choose between buying a house and buying, participating in the capital market to buy is undoubtedly the right choice.
In this regard, netizens have commented one after another, pointing out that there are problems with the rules of **. A netizen said that if the company charges regardless of the loss, then it would rather want to lose, because once it is trapped, the average person chooses not to redeem, or even make up the position, and the company can make money effortlessly. Another netizen believes that managers who have been losing money for a long time should not charge management fees, otherwise even a donkey can manage tens of billions. Some netizens sarcastically said that when the manager makes money, there may be investors to redeem it, and the management fee will be reduced. Some netizens suggested that the management fee and the performance should be linked, so that on the one hand, it can motivate the manager to do more and improve the degree of concentrationOn the other hand, it can also make investors feel fair and trusting, which is conducive to the healthy development of the entire industry.
As we all know, ** is a financial product designed to help investors grow their wealth. An important factor in investing is the management fee. The management fee is the cost required by the company in order to manage, and it is generally charged in a proportional form from the scale. However, the decoupling of the method of extraction of management fees from the performance of ** has caused dissatisfaction and controversy among investors.
On the one hand, the manager explained that the management fee is a legitimate fee charged by the company in order to provide professional investment management services, and has nothing to do with the profit or loss of the company. They believe that instead of only looking at the short-term performance, it is better to pay attention to the ability and experience of the investment research team behind the manager, as well as its grasp of the long-term investment strategy. In their view, the collection of management fees is an incentive mechanism to ensure that managers manage investors' funds with due diligence.
On the other hand, some investors disagree on how the management fee should be withdrawn. They believe that the collection of management fees should be linked to performance, that is, managers can only collect management fees after achieving an increase in the interests of investors. In this way, on the one hand, it can motivate managers to increase investment research and risk control, and on the other hand, it can also increase the trust and satisfaction of investors, which is conducive to the healthy development of the entire industry.
Looking back at the whole article, it can be seen that the method of extracting the management fee has caused a lot of controversy in the market. On the one hand, the manager believes that the management fee is a legitimate fee charged by the company for providing professional services, and has nothing to do with the profit or loss of the company. They emphasise the importance of a long-term investment strategy and believe that the collection of management fees is an incentive mechanism to ensure that managers manage investors' funds with due diligence. On the other hand, some investors believe that the method of extracting the management fee should be linked to the performance, and the management fee can only be charged after the appreciation of the investor's interests has been realized.
Personally, I believe that the method of withdrawing management fees should be more in line with the interests of investors and reflect fairness and reasonableness. On the one hand, the manager should manage the investors' funds with due diligence and strive to realize the appreciation of investors' interests. On the other hand, the company should also pay attention to the protection of investors' rights and interests, and formulate more reasonable management fee rules, such as linking the management fee with the performance of the company, so as to motivate the manager to work harder to manage investors' funds and improve risk control capabilities and return on investment. At the same time, the regulatory authorities should also strengthen the supervision of the industry, ensure the consistency of rules and implementation, and maintain the healthy development of the market.
In short, the method of extracting the management fee is a complex issue that involves multiple interests. When formulating management fee rules, all parties should fully consider the interests of investors and the development needs of the market to ensure that the rules are fair, reasonable and sustainable. Only through continuous improvement and improvement can we build a healthier, fairer and more transparent market, and provide more protection for the interests of investors.