Recently, Israel has produced a video of the surrender of Hamas militants, which has attracted widespread attention from the international community. This tactical move is not only a military offensive against Hamas, but also a part of psychological warfare. The psychological, ethical, and international relations factors behind this are all influencing the development of the situation. Psychological warfare will become a link that cannot be ignored in future wars.
Whether it is the actual military deterrence of the Israeli army or the implementation of psychological tactics, such a move involves weighing moral boundaries. The public display of enemy prisoners of war, especially when forced to surrender, has raised international questions about human rights violations and international humanitarian law.
Whether the victory of the psychological war can erase the possible moral stain behind it has become a focus of much debate. In addition to gaining a psychological advantage on the battlefield, this move is a powerful defense of diplomatic interests.
Israel aims to convey to the international community its resolute position on counter-terrorism and at the same time take the opportunity to shift its understanding of its strategic objectives. However, it also means that Israel needs to be cautious in the big arena of international relations and avoid triggering a wider boycott and accusation as a result of a war of hearts. In future conflicts, the battle is bound to evolve further.
Its rise in the digital age means that information can be transmitted faster and more widely. The state and military organizations will rely more on means to counter the psychological resistance of their opponents through images, texts, and social interactions. This situation will have far-reaching implications for future conflict patterns, international relations, and ethics.
The ethical and moral issues involved in the psychological attack have caused people to think about the legitimacy of the first war. While pursuing victory in the war, all parties need to be sensitive on the borders of the war to avoid falling into deeper conflicts due to moral issues. This controversial move will undoubtedly continue to arouse questions and reflections on the Israeli military's behavior in the international community.