Whether a product is good or bad, only those who have used it know it, but some people buy large products, and generally follow whose reputation is good to buy who's, some evaluation agencies are born by application, but objective, independent and professional third-party institutions are few, some institutions are who give money and say who is good, the problem of mobile phone evaluation has come to the automotive industry again, but there is nothing new under the sun.
On December 12th, the "2023 Winter Test of Understanding Chedi" released by the automobile evaluation agency Understanding Chedi caused dissatisfaction among car companies, because Huawei, Great Wall and other car companies are at the bottom of the rankings, these car companies are not happy, thinking that the evaluation is not scientific and rigorous, and the car companies at the top of the list are questioned about giving money, and the car emperor said that there is no discrimination, and will be tested twice, and all car companies will be invited to observe, and the whole process will be live, and those who question the car companies will be hard.
Understand the car emperor to engage in this test,Apparently did not notify the manufacturers,The specific rules were not released in advance,This plug-in hybrid group electric battery life achievement rate,Many car companies' products are shocking,The first few sides are BYD's products,Pure electric battery life can reach excellent,And like Huawei's question,Great Wall and other car company brands,The actual battery life is far less than advertised。
If the test of understanding Chedi is fair, it will undoubtedly make those car companies that talk hi and focus on propaganda be uncovered, but are the results of understanding Chedi reliable?There are different opinions, at least a few car companies in the back do not believe that it is objective to understand the car emperor, even if this is the case, these car companies are unwilling to admit it, because the impact on the brand is too bad.
The achievement rate of pure electric range of M7 only reached 31%, which is very embarrassing in the products of many car companies, Yu Chengdong, who is responsible for asking the world, directly questioned angrily, thinking that the operation of the car emperor is a pit and misleading the people, this kind of test is not rigorous and scientific, but is this really the case?
Huawei does not recognize the test results, Great Wall, Geely all believe that there is a problem in the test of understanding Chedi, and the problems reported by these car companies are that they open the door for a long time and turn on the air conditioner for a long time during the test of Chedi, which seriously violates the user's real use scenario, and the power during the test is not fully electric.
The official Weibo directly said that before the vehicle test, the car emperor carried out air conditioning heating for more than an hour, and after the car reached 24 degrees, it continued to heat for 40 minutes, and there were more than ten times to open and close the door, which undoubtedly lowered the real performance of the car, and the car emperor said that the conditions are the same, and the door is opened and closed for the installation of cameras.
If you understand that the car emperor is the same operation for the products of each car company, it is a long-term air conditioning and heating, and it is more than ten times to open and close the door, then the result is fair, if you mess with the ranking by despicable means, it will harm others and yourself, but it seems that you have decided to harden these backward car companies, and the invitation to the second test will be broadcast live on December 14, and car companies are invited to observe, I believe this time should be able to dispel doubts.
For users who are about to buy a car, it is of great significance to understand the existence of this kind of evaluation agency, but users are also worried that the evaluation agency will collect money, just like Wang Ziru's mobile phone evaluation back then, it will definitely not be able to be an objective and independent third party if the manufacturer's money is taken, if the car emperor confiscates the money of individual car companies, the evaluation results still have reference value, if it is collected, it will definitely be held and stepped on, and it will also lose the trust of users.
Is the mule is a horse to go out to know whether it is good or bad, users need this kind of test, whether it is reasonable or not, as long as the conditions set are the same, good is good, bad is not good, there will always be a gap between publicity and reality, is it the car company that exaggerates the propaganda or the evaluation agency is not objective?Time will give the answer, what do you think about this matter, leave a message below to share your views!