Title: Fight with caution to stir up emotions!The colonel's "cautious war" led to a debate among his comrades-in-arms, what do you think?
Prudent war: The colonel's "cautious war" led to a frenzy in the military circle.
Colonel Hou Angyu's sentence of "cautious war" turned out to be the fuse that aroused widespread heated discussions. The researcher of the Military Science Park has a prominent identity, but his remarks have been criticized by polarized netizens. This can't help but make me wonder if prudent warfare is cowardice or a more advanced strategic thinking
A netizen named "Ordinary People Say Things" expressed his opinion in the post, and he believed that the colonel's "cautious war" caused controversy, indicating that most netizens have deep patriotic feelings. This intrigued me, why is Shenzhan associated with patriotism?Perhaps, behind this lies the pain and cost of many wars in China's history.
The thick background of history is the cornerstone of this discussion. The suffering caused by the war to our ancestors is not only a huge material loss, but also a sacrifice of thousands of lives. This kind of painful price makes prudent warfare no longer just a tactic, but also a profound reflection on the lessons of history. Prudence, in a way, is a tribute to the suffering of the past.
The comment section is polarized. One side believes that "prudent warfare" means cowardice, and even accuses such statements of giving the enemy the confidence to be unscrupulous. They stressed that in wartime, there should be no hesitation or cowardice, and that national defense is the last line of defense, and there is no way to retreat. This view has a certain resonance in the military atmosphere, but on the other hand, there are also a few netizens who believe that war is bloody and that only cold-blooded madmen will be keen on war. It makes me wonder how soldiers should think about war, and how they can be humane in war.
Exactly when and where the word "prudent war" was used has also become a point of contention. Some people believe that prudent warfare should be used in wartime, which is a kind of strategic contempt for the enemy and tactically attaching importance to the enemy's performance. But if caution is proposed before war starts, will it seem too cautious, or even interpreted as a fear of war?This has led to in-depth thinking about the thinking of prudent warfare, and people can't help but wonder whether "prudent warfare" is contrary to the spirit of the country's bright sword.
In response to Colonel Hou's remarks, some objections have been that her research should focus on how to win a war in wartime, rather than raising caution before war has even taken place. The mission of a soldier is to carry out orders, to win battles, not to hesitate. Cautionary thinking should be a national strategic consideration, and the Colonel's perspective seems to be beyond the scope of her research.
However, there are also some voices that support the view of prudent warfare. He believes that prudent warfare is not only a military strategy, but also a political decision. How to deal with war when a country faces aggression is a matter of high-level decision-making. As a soldier, he should always be ready to fight and defeat the enemy. This kind of thinking seems to be more reasonable from the perspective of ***.
Observing the international experience, the fact that the United States used "belligerence" to build a century of prosperity cannot help but make people wonder whether a prudent war will only bring fists, but cannot achieve actual results. Soldiers should convey the message that the best people are not easy to mess with, show wolf-like fighting spirit, and be ready to meet and fight at any time.
In the end, Shen Zhan reminded me of the Chinese people's desire for peace. We are well aware that war can bring great calamities to countries and peoples. However, this does not mean that we are timid and cowardly, but that we do not easily use force, and do not want to fall into the trap of the enemy country and put ourselves in a passive predicament. We need peace, but we are not afraid of war. In the face of aggression, national territorial integrity, and national survival, we are always ready to fight, which is a profound summary of our historical experience and, more importantly, a responsibility for the future.
Prudent warfare is not only a military strategy, but also a kind of profound thinking. Under this topic, we not only see the differences of opinion between military personnel and ordinary netizens, but also see a country's thinking and expectations for its own future. This discussion may lead to more thinking about military international relations, and we look forward to more people joining this feast of ideas.