With the fierce development of the CBA game, a contest between the Guangdong men's basketball team and the Tianjin team has become the most eye-catching focus of controversy this season. At the decisive moment, the two referees' decisions caused dissatisfaction among the players and the referee, especially the 51-point beast James, who bluntly expressed his gratitude to the referee.
Late Quarter: Controversial Penalty 1: James Walking.
At the end of the game, James stood at the free throw line and faced Ren Junfei's tight defense, but the referee blew his walk. It can be clearly seen through the slow-motion replay that there is a problem with James's footsteps. However, the commentator turned a blind eye to this and even made false statements, which made the referee's decision even more controversial. This penalty caused Tianjin to lose the opportunity to extend its lead, and the situation of the game changed as a result.
The end of the game: Controversial penalty 2: Zhou Qi grabbed the board.
The real turning point of the game came when Zhou Qi and Waters competed for the basket. In Guangdong's offense, Zhang Wenyi's shot failed, and Zhou Qi grabbed the rebound and beat it strongly. However, the slow-motion replay showed that before Zhou Qi grabbed the rebound, there was a push on James. James was relentless to the referee and was eventually punished for a technical foul, making Tianjin more passive.
As far as the penalty is concerned, James's walking is not controversial, while Zhou Qi's pushing action has become the focus. These two penalties made the game even more confusing and sparked widespread discussion among fans.
End of game: player emotions and reactions.
After the game, Zhang Qingpeng's expression froze in the handshake session, and he was very disappointed with the result of the game. The referee's decision once again became the focus, causing dissatisfaction among the **. The Yongfang side of the capital ridiculed the referee's ability in the report, bluntly saying that the level of CBA referees is worrying, and called for the decision to be handed over to the players at critical moments.
Previously, Shougang ** Wang Su had questioned the referee and publicly attacked Du Feng. And this time, after Guangdong defeated Tianjin, Shougang people once again took the opportunity to ridicule Guangdong, highlighting the competition and confrontation between the top companies within the CBA.
Reflections behind the game: the quality of the referees and the toughness of the players.
However, the unfair decision of the referee in the game did not stop the Guangdong men's basketball team from winning. Although the referee's decision at the crucial moment of the game was questioned, Guangdong successfully took revenge with its strength and won eight consecutive victories. In this fierce battle, the key performances of Zhou Qi and Waters became the key to Guangdong's victory.
For controversial decisions, there are ** calls for referees to improve their standards, and at the same time, players should be tougher. The results of the competition proved that no matter the controversy, the strong can still come out on top. Both referees and players should face the game with a professional attitude and work together for the development and improvement of the CBA.
Conclusion: Call for a more fair and transparent adjudication system.
Overall, this game has become the biggest controversy in the CBA this season, not only causing heated discussions among fans, but also exposing the problems of referees and players. Behind this game, perhaps there is a need for a more fair and transparent referee system within the CBA to ensure that the game is fair and just. The fans' interest in the result also reflects the expectation of the league as a whole. Let's look forward to the future development of the CBA, and call for a more fair and transparent referee system, so that every game can become the focus of fans' keen attention.