Have you been "mastered"?
Are you the "master"?It depends on what status it belongs to in the employment contractIt's as simple as that.
The term "master" was previously clear, specific, and broad. The dictionary says that the master refers to "the ruler of finances and power." But now the word is blurred, even beyond recognition.
A few decades ago, "masters" mainly referred to the laborers in the fields, the workers in the factories and other specific laborers. It's pride, it's superiority, it's ownership.
So at that time, if there was a contract, the cultivator, the worker, and the laborer were in the position of Party A of the contract. Therefore, "Party A" is the real "master".
Since the introduction of Westernization in the contract "rules", are you the "master"?Of course, it depends on how you are in the contract. It depends on where you stand in this contract. You work in the factory, and now you have to sign a contract. If you are in the position of "Party B" in the employment contract, then you are an employee. The word wage earner is very vivid, and what about the term "master". The thing that is in this case is that you are sometimes "mastered".
Because the factory is not yours, your job has long been defined by the word "Party B" as a "worker" who only takes wages and does not take profits. You are not a "laborer" of the old age or the past. The difference between the words "labor" and "labor" here is very different.
Are you a "master" these days?It depends on whether you are Party A or notOn the other hand, it depends on whether you participate in the "profit" distributionIf you don't participate in the profit distribution, you are a "worker". You have to understand for yourself that you are the one who has been "mastered".