A Changing Global Landscape: Military Truths Under US Hegemony.
At a time when the world pattern is unpredictable, let us go deep into the truth of the collapse of US hegemony and military power. In fact, the United States is facing domestic and foreign difficulties, all of which demonstrate that it is a declining superpower.
Middle East farce: the psychological collapse of the United States.
The recent situation in the Middle East has made one wonder how a once formidable superpower is now acting more intimidating than a paper tiger in military operations in the Middle East. In order to understand this phenomenon, we need to use dialectics, go beyond superficial phenomena, and deeply analyze the changes in the strength of beauty and affairs.
Over the past decade, the United States has become increasingly cautious in its military operations. Especially in the war in Afghanistan, the US military not only failed to achieve the expected victory, but repeatedly appeared passive and teased in front of Iran and the Houthis. This is not that the U.S. ** team is not strong, but its strength is declining.
The Fall of Manufacturing: The Lack of Military Capacity.
A country's military strength is often determined by the prosperity of its manufacturing industry. However, the deindustrialization process of the United States over the past few decades has led to a serious lack of military industrial capacity. In particular, in the shipbuilding industry, the aging of the US military's main ships and the slow pace of renewal have become a major bottleneck restricting its military strength.
The dilemma of the global layout: the cost of maintaining hegemony.
The United States pursues global hegemony, but such a huge global layout has brought great trouble to it. From the Pacific Ocean to the Atlantic Ocean to the Indian Ocean, U.S. forces are scattered across the globe, making it difficult for any one region to form a comparative advantage. As a result, the United States is constrained everywhere in the world and it is difficult for the United States to maintain its original hegemonic status.
Comparison between China and the United States: The Rise and Fall of Power.
At the same time, China's rise has become a serious external variable. Around 2010, the United States decided to rebalance the Asia-Pacific region by deploying more than 60 percent of its forces around China. However, China's rapid development has put pressure on the United States. From surpassing Japan in GDP to becoming a manufacturing giant, China's rise has led to a decline in the relative power advantage of the United States.
The Helplessness of Military Strategy: America's Shift.
The US military strategy is also constantly being adjusted, and the shift from offensive to defensive is already an irreversible trend. The defeat of the war in Afghanistan and the confusion of the situation in the Middle East show that the US military's offensive capability on a global scale has declined, and in the face of a real war, the US military has shown hesitation and even some timidity.
The reality of strategic containment: The United States cannot afford two wars.
The deindustrialization of the United States and the rise of China have made the United States relatively weak in military power around the world. Unable to expand its military strength and unwilling to give up its strategic territory around the world, the United States is essentially unable to withstand two wars against China and Russia at the same time. This realistic containment has forced the US military to avoid real war and adopt more of a posture of deterrence.
The Dialectic of Psychological Warfare: America's Empty City Strategy.
The tough stance of the United States against China is actually a psychological warfare. Apparent strength cannot actually hide the decline in US strength. In the Asia-Pacific rebalance, the United States has tried to contain China through military deterrence, but this is only an empty strategy. Now China is no longer afraid of the United States, but the United States is beginning to fear losing control of China.
Timing: China has a lot to offer.
China should see clearly the true state of American power and overcome its psychological "Americanphobia". Strategically, we should not look up to the United States, but understand that the United States is essentially afraid of China. It's not that we have a request for the United States, but that the United States has a request for us. The timing is rare and promising.
Summary: The Truth Behind Military Might.
The United States' military strength is facing multiple internal and external difficulties, and its global hegemony is no longer unbreakable. From the fall of manufacturing, to the dilemma of global layout, to the helplessness of China's rise, all of this reveals the decline that a superpower is experiencing. In the face of this reality, China must keep a sober mind, treat it rationally, seize the opportunity, and do its own thing well. In the future, China will certainly show a stronger power on the international stage.
The Global Landscape: The Decline of U.S. Hegemony and the Truth About Military Power.
At present, we are in a moment when the world pattern is constantly changing, and the hegemony of the United States, as a superpower of the past few decades, is facing an unprecedented test. However, we might as well analyze it deeply, explore the truth behind the strength of the United States, and see the internal and external predicaments of this once invincible superpower.
Changes in the Middle East: The psychological collapse of the United States.
The recent fluctuations in the Middle East have raised concerns about the strength of the United States. Once the dominant player in the Middle East, the United States is now hesitant and passive in the face of Iran and the Houthis. This is not only a question of war capability, but also a manifestation of the gradual decline of strength.
The manufacturing dilemma: the lack of military capacity.
One of the keys to military strength is the strength of the manufacturing sector. However, the long-term deindustrialization of the United States has greatly constrained its military industrial capacity. In particular, in the shipbuilding industry, the main ships are seriously aging and the speed of renewal is slow, which restricts the modernization and development of the US fleet.
Global Strategic Troubles: The Cost of Hegemony.
The United States has always pursued global hegemony, but such a global layout has also brought a heavy price to it. The dispersion and disposition of forces made it difficult for the United States to maintain its comparative advantage on a global scale, which led to the shaking of its hegemonic position.
Comparison between China and the United States: The Rise and Fall of Power.
At the same time, China's rise has become an external variable. The United States has tried to counter China through a rebalance to the Asia-Pacific over the past decade, but China's rise has been unbelievably fast, putting the United States under pressure. The decline in relative strength has forced the United States to constantly readjust its military strategy, and the shift from offensive to defensive has gradually become a reality.
Strategic shift: Unable to withstand two wars.
The dual pressures of U.S. deindustrialization and China's rise make it difficult for the U.S. to withstand two wars against China and Russia at the same time on a global scale. This realistic containment has led the U.S. military to take more deterrence than substantive action.
Psychological Warfare: America's Empty City Strategy.
The tough stance of the United States against China is actually a psychological warfare. Apparent strength cannot cover up a substantial decline in strength. In the Asia-Pacific rebalance, the United States has tried to contain China through military deterrence, but this is only a bluff and empty plan.
Timing: China's Opportunity.
China should rationally look at the real situation of US power and overcome its psychological "Americanphobia". In the face of the changes in the United States, we should see the rare opportunity, seize the opportunity, and do our own thing. In the future, China will show a more powerful force on the international stage and continue to promote the evolution of the world pattern.
Summary: Multiple tests of military strength.
The truth of the strength of the United States is far from what it seems, and its predicament is not only the internal manufacturing dilemma, but also the external global strategic trouble. The comparison between China and the United States shows that the relative strength of the United States has risen and fallen, so that the United States has to adjust its strategy. China needs to see this reality clearly, seize the opportunity, and create more possibilities for its own rise.