When I first heard the phrase "rules are made by people", another question rushed to my thoughts, who made the rules?
The answer to this question is not fixed.
For example, when working in a company, the rules are set by the boss, and in the company's environment, the boss is the final arbiter.
But if the company wants to make a profit, the boss will say that it doesn't count, sometimes the market has the final say, the environment has the final say, and sometimes the boss visits the person who has the final say, and the boss has the final say.
The answer is not fixed, but there is an answer that is fixed, that is, the people who set the rules provide security, and the people who abide by the rules provide value, of course, this is an ideal state.
There is almost no ideal state in reality, and the unideal state makes people realize that there are many unfair, or to put it simply, extremely, really and unpleasantly, an undesirable state means that the imbalance relationship will become more and more intense, the strength to provide security is getting smaller and smaller, and the energy to provide value is getting bigger and bigger.
Whether it is the world** or the "small circle culture", you can see a lot of inexplicable joyful keywords from those dazzling spiritual goods, such as teaching you how to give yourself reasonably, such as not letting the current predicament delay your future great prospects, or those like broken thoughts "hungry for their body and skin, empty for their body" After the promise of benefits, they stuff all the good things they can think of into you, they expect you to understand their good intentions, and then repay them better, and if your rewards are not enough, rich enough, not sincere enough, they will use insincere ways to educate you, you forget what you shouldn't forget, and you only blame yourself for the opportunities you lost.
In fact, now that I think about it, people do forget some things that they shouldn't forget.
I heard this thing a long time ago, in the class when I was a student, I heard the teacher say, this thing is called, forget the roots.
For ordinary people, the book of forgetting the original is not a particularly lofty exclusive noun, but a very basic and simple existence.
For example, when you are thirsty, you have to drink water, when you are hungry, you have to eat, when you are thirsty, you have to drink enough water, so that you don't feel uncomfortable when you are thirsty, you don't panic when you are full, and you have the strength to live when you are full.
The so-called forgetting the basics does not mean forgetting thirst and hunger, but forgetting that these things should be decided by themselves.
For example, whether a person is thirsty or not, it is not up to others to have the final say, someone tells you to be thirsty, you should drink water, what water to drink, drink more and drink less, this standard is your own, not what others demand.
The current situation is that if you are thirsty or not, others will "make the rules of thirst", this rule is reached, you must drink, and you must drink the standard, you want to boil some boiled water to drink, that is not good, this water can not be drunk like this, you have to buy water, and someone will tell you that you drank the wrong water before, from today you drink according to my method, so that your water will drink right, you drink the right water, your life will be worthwhile, there is hope.
A sparse and ordinary thing, is defined as a kind of representative of many meanings, many values of complex products, thirsty to drink water, by some people into a symbolic behavior, a kind of competition to obtain qualifications, once upon a time, the only standard for drinking water is thirst, and now whether they are thirsty or not, have become "involuntarily" helpless:
From the moment the choice is lost, there is only one answer to all the questions, that is, you have no choice, you can only be wrong.
After breaking the illusion, the hunger of the spirit makes people sober up instead, what exactly did those who were never satisfied, the faint scars on their bodies prove all the answers you want to know, the illusions that were deliberate, targeted, trampled on have long since gone and never returned, or that such fantasies should not exist in the first place:
The edge of facts cuts off the cover of falsehood, and the value of this "blade of self-defense" may be far more than that.