Since private enterprises are "their own people", they are not enemies, and the big hats that are flying all over the Internet must be removed: what evil, bloody, exploitation and oppression, compradors, traitors, ......These ideological slogans are put aside for a moment and see how to restore confidence in private enterprises
Slogans don't inspire confidence.
To be practical, only three moves, the private economy can be recovered immediately, continue to make due contributions to the construction of socialism, the country now not only needs Zibo barbecue fire, but also needs the entire private economy, especially private enterprises to be on fire.
Which three tricks?
The first trick is to clear long-term arrears
Arrears, especially long-term arrears, are serious breaches of contract, which are intolerable in any market environment and fatal to the market economyThis is tantamount to pumping the blood of creditors, and it is an out-and-out pursuit of wealth and karma.
However, long-term arrears have become the norm in the past decade, and what is even more incredible is that long-term arrears do not only occur between enterprises, but also a large number of local enterprises in arrears and state-owned enterprises in arrears to private enterprises. How can this improve the rule of law economy?This is equivalent to the traffic police every day to manage this and that, and they go to illegal parking everywhere, such a business environment, how to build confidence?People prefer to believe that China's business owners are all untrustworthy profiteers, and turn a blind eye to the typical behavior of undermining market credit, such as large and long-term arrears from local to state-owned enterprises.
It is absolutely intolerable for the contractor to default on the migrant workers and become a liarity;However, it is difficult to solve the contractor's arrears, and what is even worse is that the local and head enterprises are in arrears with the contractor, which is even more difficult to go to the skyNo one has asked about such an unhealthy phenomenon for more than ten years, what is the logic behind it?
There used to be a large-scale situation of triangular debts, all of which were subdued in less than a month, and now they have shown this kind of courage, and I believe that all private enterprises can be saved, or they will retreat, or they will break into the rivers and lakes again.
This trick must work.
The second move is to unify the lending rate across the country and restore currency neutrality
The year before last, everyone wanted to take out a loan, but they couldn't get it at all;Why desperately take out loans?They don't really want to expand reproduction, many enterprises can't get back their receivables, and they can't escape the payables, so they can only continue their lives with high-interest loans.
Again, this is a puzzling thing.
First, enterprises that want to develop cannot borrow money, because the currency has lost the neutral principle of marketization, and flows to state-owned enterprises and real estate, and the real economy itself is short of blood;In fact, the intermediary and the bank are essentially one, and the loan is still the bank's moneyAnd there are so many financial intermediaries that shuttle between enterprises and banks in a grand manner, and the state does not get any benefits, but sucks the blood of enterprises dry, and no one cares about it.
Policy has been trying to lower interest rates, but the results have not been achieved.
This year, the situation has changed again, the enterprise has been seriously injured, and those who can not take out loans resolutely do not lend, because the entire financial market lacks health, and because the oil of the enterprise has been exhausted, so what the policy needs to do now is not a group of financial intermediaries flying all over the sky every day, and the problem is ultimately in the monetary policy.
If the principle of monetary neutrality is restored and loans are uniformly made at the current interest rates of state-owned enterprises, I believe that the entire private enterprise will rejoice.
Since it is "your own person", why should you treat it differently?
If the economic situation is good, especially in some subsidized industries, better policies should be given to state-owned enterprises, which is not a problem in itself, but if the principle of non-neutrality is adopted between the two economies, it will definitely deepen the contradiction between supply and demand, and the efficiency will become increasingly low.
The third move is to open up competition for all projects
This year, the epidemic is over, and many companies want to fight again, but the market is generally very deserted and lacks projects, which is still a matter of neutral principles. The money of state-owned enterprises cannot be spent, and the project cannot be completed, in the words of Yao Yang of Peking University Development Institute, state-owned enterprises win the project, extract profits, and then transfer them to private enterprises to enjoy the results. Is this economic model normal?
The project should be opened, in addition to the project directly related to the first-class project, all market-oriented operation, the necessary competition, at least not to take the country's investment, layer by layer of profits, and private enterprises will also participate in the project through efficiency advantages, which can be said to be the same market position.
With these three moves, can the private economy recover?
At the end of the year, a piece of advice to friends of small and medium-sized enterprises: the market is cruel, in an environment of insufficient demand, it is inevitable to survive the fittest, if your business has lost the ability to regenerate, it is better to survive with broken arms;If you are an excellent business, I believe that after the night, the remainder is king.