Title:
The conflict escalates!The Israeli army adjusts its moves, and the battle situation changes in an instant, who can have the last laugh?
Recently, the war in the Middle East has resumed, and the wrestling between Israel and Hamas has become the focus of international attention. In this melee, the tactical adjustment of the Israeli army caused widespread heated discussions. As a veteran military international relations blogger, we might as well dig deeper into the key changes in this conflict and their possible impact on the future pattern of warfare.
First, let's go back to the origins of this crisis. The desert winds of the Middle East are heavy and profound, and like a thousand years of history, they carry countless wars. In this latest conflict, a key realignment of the Israeli army has come into focus. Their proposal to abandon the traditional "infantry-to-tank" tactic has led us to think about the changing roles and roles of infantry in the modern combat environment.
This adjustment is not untargeted, but a response to today's rapid urbanization and changes in the operational environment. In the past, traditional tank and infantry combined attacks worked well in open areas, but today's rapid rise in urbanization has made this tactic inadequate. The narrow space and complex terrain in the city make the traditional step-tank cooperation face unprecedented challenges.
What is even more interesting is that in the battle of equipment for this war, the Israeli Female Tiger infantry fighting vehicle contrasted with the Russian BMP-3. The tigress excels in firepower and protection, but is slightly lacking in maneuverability and is slightly inferior to the Russian BMP-3. This is not just a simple contest of equipment, but also involves the actual needs of different countries' military doctrines and logistical support.
When it comes to logistics, this is precisely one of Russia's strong points, especially when it comes to large-scale mobile force operations. The challenge for Israel, however, is how to effectively combat Hamas's tunnel network in Gaza and conduct guerrilla warfare. Hamas, with its highly creative and adaptable authentic tactics, has become a headache for the Israeli army. They lurk through clever underground passages, making it impossible for Israel's sturdy armored vehicles to completely deter enemy movements.
Even more striking is the technical and tactical capabilities of the infantry displayed by Hamas's Qassam brigades. In the close-quarters firefight, they dealt a heavy blow to the Israeli army, which made people sweat for this seemingly inferior organization. This challenge to traditional armies has left Israeli soldiers with no overwhelming advantage against an adversary as Hamas, who is agile and adept at using urban environments for guerrilla warfare, despite operating sturdy and powerful tanks and armored vehicles.
Looking back at the situation in the Middle East and the systems, operational concepts and national conditions of all parties, we see that the Israeli army is facing an unprecedented test. They must re-examine their own system design concepts, update their traditional combat concepts, and be more flexible in responding to new combat methods adopted by unconventional enemies in the new urbanized environment. This is not just a war, but a prelude to a military change.
In summary, tensions in the Middle East and the tactical adjustments of the Israeli army have provoked us to think about the modern pattern of warfare. War is no longer a simple clash of firepower, but a more complex and changeable game. The change of military steps is not only a tactical adjustment, but also a subversion of traditional concepts, and a response to the challenges of the new era. It may be a war, but it is also a change, and we are experiencing every step of the way.