The Red Sea is one of the world's most important shipping lanes and an important link between Europe, Asia and Africa. However, the recent HouthisArmedThe operation of the attack on the merchant ships of the Red Sea was givenShippingSecurity poses a serious threat. In response to this situation, US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin announced the creation of a multinational coalition of forces with the main task of protecting the Red Sea regionShippingSecurity, stop the HouthisArmedof the attack. However, soon after, the United States announced that it was asking China for help, indicating that a multinational coalition alone could not solve the problem.
Against the HouthisArmedThe U.S. multinational coalition vigilant operation does not seem to be satisfactory. On the one hand, the HouthisArmedRightU.S. militaryThe deterrence is not enough to make it fearful, and it is not because of the HouthisArmedStrong enough to be able to compete withU.S. militaryCounter, but because of the HouthisArmedWe are well aware of America's weaknesses. The multinational coalition formed by the United States this time is clearly biased in favor of Israel and the HouthisArmedThe attack on Israel was not impulsive, but on IsraelGaza StripResponses to the act. The situation in the Gaza region has attracted widespread attention from the international community, with even US allies, such as Japan and the United Kingdom, favouring or abstaining from the cease-fire resolution. In addition, Australia, Canada and New Zealand have issued a joint statement calling on Israel to cease fire and allow humanitarian aid to enterGaza Strip。With the exception of the United States, countries around the world have expressed dissatisfaction with Israel's actions. HouthisArmedIt has made it clear that if Israel does not release humanitarian aid, they will continue to attack Israeli-linked vessels. From another point of view, as long as Israel allows humanitarian aid, the HouthisArmedNaturally, the attacks will stop. Israel does not giveGaza StripThe irony that more than 2 million civilians are alive and that the United States wants to unite many countries to protect Israel is thought-provoking. Therefore, although the United States can invite multiple countries to participate, it has to count on these countries to really contribute to the fight against the HouthisArmedNot an easy task.
In addition, the United States has repeatedly changed its tactics in the process of dealing with the situation in the Red Sea, first sending a fleet to escort ships, and as a result, the HouthisArmedAs soon as I saw itU.S. militaryRun away when you comeU.S. militaryGone and they came back. After that, Austin publicly stated that he wanted to defeat HouthisArmed, but in the end he gave up and chose to form this league of ten countries. Why give up the fight against the HouthisArmedWhat about it?The reason is not because of the goodwill of the United States, but because of the HouthisArmedThere is Iran as a powerful backer behind it, and the United States is worried about provoking Iran too much and getting further involvedIsraeli-Palestinian conflict, which led to the defeat of Israel. Hence the US against the HouthisArmedSanctions are no longer possible.
However, tensions in the Red Sea have also led to the fact that this important route has become almost unavailable. Israel's ports are at risk of closure, and may even have long-term consequences for Israel's future economic development. In this case,United States**Biden is waiting for China to join. Why is this so?Because China has good relations with Iran, it can dissuade Iran from the HouthisArmedsupport. However, the question of whether China should be involved is a question. From both the emotional and rational perspectives, there is no need for the Chinese side to do this. Emotionally, how has the United States treated China in the past?How can China pay for the mess left by the United States and Israel?Rationally, as mentioned earlier, as long as Israel allows humanitarian aid, the HouthisArmedNaturally stop the attack. If Israel is not willing to do this, why should other countries pay for Israel?In addition, aroundIsraeli-Palestinian conflictChina has also repeatedly warned the United States that the key to solving the problem is to implement the "two-state solution". However, the United States has never taken concrete action to pay lip service to Israel, nor has it respected Palestine. Is it fair and reasonable that the United States has never really taken China's point of view to heart, but now it wants China to help?Should China harm IranDiplomatic relations, to meet the requirements of the US side?Therefore, the US demand can be said to be very excessive, and there is no need for the Chinese side to provide assistance.
The tension of the situation in the Red Sea givesShippingSecurity poses a great threat, the HouthisArmedThe attacks made it dangerous to sail in this area. For protectionShippingsecurity, the United States formed a multinational coalition, but the results were not ideal. HouthisArmedForU.S. militaryThe deterrence of the United States is insufficient, and the US multinational coalition vigilant operation cannot solve the problem. Moreover, the actions of the United States are clearly biased in favor of Israel, and Israel is thereGaza StripThe act has been causedInternationalWidespread concern and dissatisfaction in society. The United States' changing tactics also show that it is unable to effectively solve the dilemma. The United States hopes that China will step in and influence Iran to restrain the HouthisArmedBut from both emotional and rational perspectives, there is no need for the Chinese side to help in this matter. It is very excessive for the United States to ignore China's interests and views while hoping that China will solve the problem for it. Therefore, there is no need for China to pay for the problems left by the United States and Israel, and there is no need to harm Iran for this matterDiplomatic relations