Liu Dong, the head teacher, was sentenced to compensate the parents of student Xiong Xin more than 230,000 yuan, but the compensation has not been paid five years later. Xiong Xin, a student at the Chongqing Industrial School, drowned during a scenic tour, after she had slept with Liu Dong five times. Wang Qiang, as Xiong Xin's father, took Liu Dong, the school and the scenic spot to court. The court found out that Liu Dong and Xiong Xin were staying together in a hotel, and according to the chat records, Liu Dong had invited Xiong Xin several times, but Liu Dong said that nothing had happened to them, and they were only worried that something would happen to her. Xiong Xin is a well-behaved and high-achieving student in the eyes of his family and teachers. But after Xiong Xin entered the school, she rarely went home, and Liu Dong became the school's student education management officer and served as the homeroom teacher of Xiong Xin's class. This article presents this case of abnormal relationship between students and teachers from the background, process, judgment and subsequent disputes of the incident, and puts forward some thoughts and questions, which deserve our in-depth attention.
When Xiong Xin, an underage girl, committed suicide by jumping into a river during the Spring Festival in 2016, his parents, Wang Qiang and his wife, claimed compensation from Xiong Xin's homeroom teacher, Liu Dong, the school, and the scenic spot where she died. In the judicial process of this case, many issues were involved, such as the cause of Xiong Xin's death, Liu Dong's personal behavior, and the responsibility of the school and the scenic spot. According to the transcript of **, Xiong Xin once complained to Liu Dong that he did not find her a job, and said that there were problems in his family. In the process, Liu Dong offered Xiong Xin a stay. But Tang thought that Xiong Xin wanted to commit suicide by jumping into the river because he had sex with Liu Dong, but Liu Dong flatly denied it in the questioning of **. Since then, no human ** component has been detected in the DNA identification results. In the first instance of this case, the court held that Xiong Xin, as a minor, still lacks the ability to perceive the objective social environment and self-subjectivity, is not mature enough in his thinking, and has great emotional fluctuations, and is more likely than adults to affect his judgment ability and make extreme choices when his thinking falls into a misunderstanding.
As an adult and a school teacher, Liu Dong should be clearly aware of the above-mentioned characteristics of minors. Although Xiong Xin's depression and suicide were due to family reasons, Liu Dong, as an adult who took Xiong Xin out of school and accompanied him outside the school, had a duty to take proper care of Xiong Xin. Therefore, Liu Dong was sentenced to bear 30% of the liability and 234414 compensation6 yuan, and there is no responsibility for schools and scenic spots. In the second instance of this case, the court upheld the judgment of the first instance. However, the family of the deceased said that the compensation had not been paid for many years. In general, the case involves many aspects such as the protection of minors, the duties of teachers, and personal behavior at work. In similar incidents, the education administrative department should strengthen the supervision of school management, and teachers should pay more attention to the psychological condition of students, improve students' awareness of self-protection, and ensure safety inside and outside the school. At the same time, parents should also pay attention to their children's mental health and improve the quality of family education.
On this basis, the judicial authorities should seriously deal with the relevant responsible persons, so that others can take warning and avoid the recurrence of similar incidents. Finally, we need to think about how to build a healthier growth environment at multiple levels such as education, family, and society, so that every minor can grow up healthily, safely, and happily. Wang Qiang's family has been seeking compensation from Liu Dong due to Xiong Xin's accidental death, but more than three years have passed, and they have still not received compensation. Wang Qiang had applied to the court for compulsory enforcement, but Liu Dong had not paid compensation. Lawyer Wang said that Liu Dong's only property is a property jointly owned by him and his ex-wife, but only half of the property rights can be disposed of, resulting in the house has not been able to be auctioned**, only 90,000 yuan in compensation, and the remaining 100,000 yuan has not been paid. Liu Dong did not agree with the court's decision, and said that he suffered from the freezing of his bank card and the loss of his job. Up to now, the enforcement procedure of this case has been suspended, and the road to recovery for Wang Qiang's family is still long.
What happened to Wang Qiang's family has sparked thinking about the criminal compensation system. At present, China's criminal compensation system is still inadequate, forcing victims to face many difficulties in recovering compensation. First of all, the enforcement is not enough, resulting in the inability to pay compensation in a timely manner. Second, the standard of compensation is low, and it is not possible to truly enable the victim to receive the financial compensation he deserves. Third, there are many flaws in the application and enforcement procedures for criminal compensation, which make it more difficult to recover. Therefore, we need to further improve the criminal compensation system, improve the effectiveness of enforcement and compensation standards, and simplify the application and enforcement procedures, so that victims can receive due compensation in a timely manner after being violated. On the other hand, Liu Dong did not recognize the court's judgment in this case, which also triggered our thinking about judicial fairness. Judicial impartiality is the cornerstone of social justice, but there are also some problems in practice. For example, whether the judgment is fair, whether the referee has a conflict of interest, etc.
Therefore, we need to promote the realization of judicial fairness through measures such as strengthening judicial supervision and improving the quality of judges. Only by truly guaranteeing judicial fairness can the masses of the people truly trust and rely on the judicial system. In short, what happened to Wang Qiang's family and Liu Dong's attitude have triggered our thinking about criminal compensation and judicial fairness. We need to promote the improvement of the criminal compensation system, improve its enforcement effectiveness and compensation standards, and at the same time, we also need to strengthen judicial supervision, improve the quality of referees, and enhance judicial fairness. The resolution of the issue of criminal compensation requires the joint efforts and participation of all sectors of society. Ultimately, we need to think about how everyone can be guaranteed and respected under a fair justice systemThe chat record led to the "compensation door", and Wang Qiang and Liu Dong started a dispute over responsibility, which sparked heated discussions in the society. Xiong Xin's death has aroused widespread concern in the society, in addition to the grief of her family, her friend Liu Dong has also been pushed to the forefront because of this.
Recently, the chat records of Xiong Xin and Liu Dong on the Internet have been **, which has aroused more questions about the reason for Xiong Xin's death. In this context, Xiong Xin's father, Wang Qiang, submitted a document called "Compensation Agreement on Xiong Xin's Death", and submitted a compensation claim of 1.37 million yuan to a municipal college in Nanjing. This agreement has attracted the attention of **, and most people's opinion is to blame the school, but Liu Dong is mentioned in the agreement, which also raises netizens' questions about Liu Dong. Liu Dong said that he just cared about her because Xiong Xin didn't go home, and he didn't live together. He said that when he left, he just opened a house, and later alienated her because of something at home. He believes that Xiong Xin has an important responsibility for his parents' rebellion and running away from home, and Xiong Xin's parents should also be responsible for Xiong Xin's death. He said he would appeal again if he could. On the other hand, Wang Qiang believes that his daughter has passed away for a long time, and only hopes that the judgment can be fulfilled as soon as possible, and the teacher cannot but bear any compensation and responsibility.
In the Compensation Gate incident, the issue of the responsibility of Xiongxin's school and parents has attracted attention. On closer analysis, schools should play a better role in safety measures and education, while parents should play a better role in educating and supervising their children. On this basis, everyone should be held accountable for their own actions. Whether the relationship between Liu Dong and Xiong Xin is just a matter of care and friendship, and whether there is a major reason for Xiong Xin's running away from home needs to be further investigated.
What are your thoughts on this matter?Comments are welcome**!