In the 5,000 years of China, who is the most perfect emperor in these 5,000 years, and can be worthy of the title of the first emperor of the ages, maybe a long, long time ago, I will say without hesitation, Qin Shi Huang, Qin Shi Huang is the first emperor of the ages, he is the most powerful.
But with the development of the times, people look at the problem more and more diversified, the so-called emperor through the ages, he must have made some achievements, then first Qin Emperor Han Wu he was the first to be selected, Qin Shi Huang expanded the territory more than doubled, he also created a centralized system, the feudal history has been vigorously advanced for more than 2000 years, do you say that he is a well-deserved emperor?
Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty attacked the Xiongnu in the north, conquered Baiyue in the south, collected Hexi in the west, and broke Goryeo in the east.
You said that this kind of emperor, whether he can be worthy of the emperor of the ages, I don't think there seems to be anything wrong with it.
And then after him, is it Tang Taizong who can also be counted as one. He has said that taking copper as a mirror, you can dress properly, take people as a mirror, you can know the gains and losses, take history as a mirror, and know the rise and fall.
He also appointed talents, he was also particularly strong in political management, he learned his own experience from the fall of the Sui Dynasty, he was not eclectic in reducing talents, he adopted a good foreign policy, and his economic and literary attainments were particularly high.
Under his rule, the country and the people are safe, can he also be regarded as the first emperor of the ages?
Zhu Yuanzhang started as a small beggar and founded Daming all the way, which is called the most backbone dynasty of the Chinese, can it also be called?
In addition to these, Emperor Guangwu of the Han Dynasty made the Han Dynasty twice, almost perfect, Ming Chengzu Zhu Di divided and attacked Mongolia to the West, created a cabinet system, repaired the Yongle Grand Canon, and finally made out the prosperity of all countries to come to the dynasty.
Although Kublai Khan unloaded the mill and killed the donkey, and the civilization regressed, he beat the enemy's head and blood.
He has also made progress in industry, democracy, thought, business, etc., and is a person who opens his eyes to the world, and whether he is also a controversial candidate.
In addition, there are a series of emperors such as Liu Che, Yang Jian, Liu Bang, etc., can they all be called famous emperors?
So who among them has the most credit?
Isn't that really a bit of a headache?
The term "Emperor of the Ages" first appeared in the Ming Dynasty, which was the evaluation of Qin Shi Huang's Yingzheng in the "Collection of Books", and later Wang Zhijian also used it to evaluate Li Shimin, Taizong of the Tang Dynasty, in "Reading Shi Shang and Volume 3", and then developed into the highest standard for evaluating an emperor.
For people, to become an emperor of the ages, there must be no negative news or major mistakes, to make great contributions to civilization, often must have long-term influence, and have outstanding performance in cultural and martial arts.
Under his rule, the country was powerful, capable of promoting unity and cooperation between nations and peoples, with courage and openness to show to the outside world, capable of fighting, and possessing excellent military leadership.
Having a profound and positive impact on future generations.
So in the vast history, who is the real emperor of the ages in your heart?