The five situations of rural subsistence allowance are prohibited from receiving them, and the village cadres verify the situation!
Background and purpose of rural livelihood policies.
As a policy to benefit the poor population in terms of basic living problems, the rural subsistence allowance policy has brought economic benefits to some rural residents who are living in difficulty. However, due to the limited funds for the subsistence allowance, some people have tried every possible means to obtain support funds from these countries, and are even reluctant to give up the quota to poor households who really need assistance, which has affected the effectiveness of the subsistence allowance policy to a certain extent.
In response to this problem, counties, townships, and villages have begun to take measures to strictly restrict the eligibility for the subsistence allowance and prohibit people from receiving the subsistence allowance under certain circumstances through household verification and investigation. This measure will not only help ensure the orderly use of the subsistence allowance funds, but also better meet the needs of poor families who are truly in need of assistance.
Five situations in which low-cost insurance is prohibited.
1) Persons whose family members go out to work and whose annual income exceeds the local rural subsistence allowance standard: With the development of the rural economy and the increase of employment opportunities, more and more rural residents choose to go out to work. However, some family members who have gone out to work have higher salaries, and their family income has exceeded the subsistence allowance standard. These people have been lifted out of poverty and no longer need the support of the subsistence allowance funds, so priority should be given to poor households who really need help.
2) Those whose family members have the ability to work but refuse to participate in local vocational training or job introduction: In rural areas, some family members with the ability to work refuse to participate in local vocational training or job introduction, preferring to be self-employed or go out to work. Since their labor income is already higher than the average economic income of low-income families, they do not fall within the scope of low-income beneficiaries, so they should not be included in the scope of the subsistence allowance.
3. Family members with criminal records: Some low-income households do not comply with laws and regulations, and even engage in illegal and criminal activities to obtain survival resources, and have been punished by law. Such behavior has seriously damaged the credibility and effectiveness of the entire subsistence allowance system, and their eligibility for subsistence allowance should be immediately revoked.
4. Family members receiving other social assistance: Some of the family members of the subsistence allowance may be retired servicemen or persons receiving other assistance, and they already have other reliable channels of assistance to solve their basic living expenses, and their living standards are higher than those of ordinary subsistence families. Therefore, their eligibility for the subsistence allowance should be revoked and those in urgent need of assistance should be allowed to receive the subsistence allowance.
5) Family members who hold resident ID cards but do not live in rural areas: Although some low-income households have rural hukou, they do not live in rural areas, but live in urban areas. Now that they have been lifted out of poverty and left the rural way of life, their status as low-income households should also be abolished.
By strictly limiting the above five situations, the rural subsistence allowance policy will be able to pay more attention to the families in real need and ensure that the subsistence allowance funds are used wisely.
The importance of household verification by rural cadres.
In view of the above five situations, rural cadres need to go to the household to verify and understand the real situation in order to accurately assess the qualifications of the subsistence allowance recipients. Cadres sitting in the office cannot really understand the living conditions and actual income of low-income families, and only through household surveys can they obtain reliable first-hand information, grasp the situation more comprehensively, and make correct decisions.
Rural cadres should have an in-depth understanding of the family situation of low-income households, including whether family members go out to work, how capable they are, whether they have participated in vocational training or job introduction, whether they have criminal records, whether they enjoy other social assistance or welfare, and whether they live in rural areas. Only through on-the-spot investigation and comprehensive collection of information can we better assess the qualifications of subsistence allowance households, suspend the issuance of subsistence allowances in accordance with the law, and cancel their qualifications for subsistence allowances.
The importance of rural livelihood policies.
Adjusting and improving the rural subsistence allowance policy is of great significance to eradicating poverty among the impoverished population. By strictly restricting the eligibility for the subsistence allowance, we can not only ensure the orderly distribution of the subsistence allowance, but also make the limited resources better used for those who really need help, promote the self-development of poor households, and accelerate the process of poverty alleviation.
The adjustment of the rural subsistence allowance policy has also successfully promoted the development of the rural economy and the increase of peasant incomes. By fully understanding the employment situation of the rural labor force, encouraging and helping them to participate in training and local employment, we can improve the income level of low-income rural families and achieve sustainable poverty alleviation.
At the same time, strictly restricting the eligibility to apply for the subsistence allowance is also conducive to establishing social credibility and improving the fairness of the subsistence allowance. The removal of eligibility for subsistence allowance households that do not meet the criteria can make people see the fair implementation of the policy and increase people's trust in the subsistence allowance system. Only by ensuring the correct and rational use of funds can we better realize the benefits of the subsistence allowance policy.
Personal reflections and conclusions.
In the process of adjusting and improving the rural subsistence allowance policy, the household verification of rural cadres plays a vital role. Only through on-the-spot research and understanding of the real situation can we make more accurate judgments and ensure that the subsistence allowance funds are well utilized. At the same time, it is also necessary to strengthen the training and supervision of rural cadres to ensure the objectivity, impartiality and fair application of the verification work.
For"In the five cases, they are not entitled to the subsistence allowance"In my opinion, this is a measure that needs to be addressed urgently. By strictly restricting the eligibility for the subsistence allowance, we can ensure the rational allocation of resources and give priority to supporting poor households that really need assistance. This policy adjustment is not only conducive to improving the effectiveness and fairness of the subsistence allowance policy, but also encourages rural residents to actively participate in vocational training and labor market placement, thereby promoting the development of the rural economy and poverty alleviation in poor areas.
However, it should be noted that in implementing these policies, it is necessary to ensure the impartiality and objectivity of the verification work and prevent the subjective consciousness or personal bias of individual cadres from affecting the fairness of policy decisions. The most important thing is to increase support for poor rural families in addition to the subsistence allowance policy, and provide more employment opportunities, training opportunities and other forms of poverty alleviation policies to help them better get out of poverty.
In short, it is necessary to adjust and improve the rural subsistence allowance policy, and better achieve the objectives of the subsistence allowance policy by strictly restricting the eligibility for the subsistence allowance, help poor households that really need help to improve their living conditions, and promote the development of the rural economy and the alleviation of poverty in poor areas. At the same time, it is necessary to pay attention to ensuring the fairness and objectivity of the verification work, increase support for poor rural families, and comprehensively promote poverty alleviation from the overall situation.