According to research, the crash of the "Osprey" rotorcraft of the US ** team stationed in Japan into the sea has aroused the anger of the Japanese people. However, the United States has shown a contemptuous attitude towards Japan. To make matters worse, just a few days later, the *** of the US military stationed in Japan dropped a deck part weighing 7 kilograms. Nowadays, the U.S. military's equipment is generally aging, and aircraft and missing parts have become commonplace. At the same time, Japan's blind reliance on the support of the United States to flex its muscles in the Asia-Pacific region has been wishful thinking for many years. Unlike the United States, Europe's allies are more vigilant and respond violently if they find out that they have been deceived. European powers such as France and Germany initially refused to write blank checks for US policy toward Iraq because they opposed US domination of the world.
These countries considered the invasion of Iraq to be a grave mistake, and the public was strongly opposed to the U.S. war in Iraq. Theyrs also have a lot of criticism of the United States, like the French ones. Despite the relentless attacks on their own countries by some of the United States, this does not prove how flat Europe's allies are. Now, Europe has begun to take a tougher stance against the United States. Spain, Belgium, and France, for example, have all strongly condemned Israel's genocidal war in Gaza. And as the main supporter of Israel** and funds, the United States has repeatedly exercised its veto power in the Security Council to defend Israel. The actions of these European countries can be considered a blatant provocation against the United States.
France has been one of the first countries to rise up in revolt, and as early as January 2005, Jean-Noël Jeannane, a well-known historian and director of the National Library of France, published a long article in Le Monde entitled "When Google Challenges Europe". In the article, he expressed concern about Google's plan to digitize books and read them, arguing that it poses a threat to France. He feared that this plan would lead to a preference for English-language works and American culture, eventually leading to a unipolar worldview. While in the U.S. the project is described as the fulfillment of a long-held dream of a global library, in France it is seen as "Google-Google-free, a devastating American cultural project that will dominate the world for future generations."
The French are acutely aware that the United States is trying not only to dominate the globe in the military and economic spheres, but also to influence the way people think globally through cultural exports. Jean Nané uses the example of the French Revolution in particular to highlight the problems posed by the different perspectives of the Anglo-Americans and the French on history. Anglo-American history typically focuses on the situation of the aristocracy and the guillotine, while the French view the institutional innovations of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the National Convention with greater pride. This discrepancy is even directly reflected in the recent film Napoleon, which was made by British and American filmmakers, who reduced the great figure of French history to a clown and screened it around the world, to the frustration and indignation of the French.
Therefore, Jean Nane suggested back then that the European Parliament should launch its own digitization program so that European writings could be read, thus resisting the US "speak only English globally" plan. This reflects the French people's strong determination to protect their own culture and values, as well as their concern and resistance to international cultural exports.