The collapse of the "empire on which the sun never sets": revealing the truth behind the rout of the Spanish "Invincible Armada"!
Rising Spain.
During the expeditions of the Age of Discovery, Spain emerged as the world's first "empire on which the sun never sets". At the end of the 15th century, after more than 700 years of "Reconquista", Spain successfully expelled the Moors from the Iberian Peninsula and achieved "liberation". Isabella was a brilliant supporter of Columbus's voyage and gave Europeans their first glimpse of the Americas. Spain quickly established colonies in the Americas and acquired huge wealth through brutal colonial plunder, which became the "** era" of the 16th century.
The British "Corsairs Royal".
England was relatively weak in the 15th-early 16th centuries and could not compete with the major European powers. However, in 1588, England defeated the Spanish "Armada", leading the decline of Spanish hegemony. Why was the "weak" Britain able to defeat the "strong" Spain? Britain used the "Royal Corsairs" to weaken Spain, shattering the myth of the "Invincible Armada" through flexible strategy.
Armada "rout".
In 1588, the "Armadada" was dispatched in large numbers, with 130 warships, 8,000 soldiers and 180,000 sailors. However, the combined forces of Britain and the Netherlands defeated the Spanish with clever tactics. The death of the commander Cruze deprived the "Invincible Armada" of its backbone, and the new commander-in-chief, the Duke of Sidonia, failed to adapt to the mode of naval warfare, which eventually led to defeat. The British, on the other hand, managed to thwart the Spanish offensive through small "fast ships" and flexible tactics.
Spain's dilemma.
After recovering lost territory, Spain's "empire on which the sun never sets" failed to adapt to the needs of economic development. Relying too much on colonial plunder rather than development and industry led to the loss of wealth. At the same time, the Spanish crown squandered its wealth and failed to spend it on nation-building. Political corruption and popular instability have exacerbated Spain's predicament.
The prosperity of Britain.
In contrast, the United Kingdom adopts a capitalist model and focuses on the development of the industry and the industry. By weakening Spain through the "pirates royale", Britain successfully defended its homeland and quickly developed into a world hegemon after the war. Britain insisted on putting its own economic interests first and became the representative country of capitalism.
Epilogue. 
The defeat of Spain's "Armada" was not the result of Britain becoming the new hegemon in World War I, but revealed the flaws of Spain's own development model. Britain's flexible strategy, economic development, and the primacy of national interests eventually led to the status of world hegemon, while the "empire on which the sun never sets" gradually declined while sticking to tradition.
This article profoundly examines the reasons for the rout of Spain's "Armada" and how Britain defeated the powerful Spain with the help of "pirates royal" and finally emerged as the new world hegemon. Through detailed historical facts and sound analysis, this article shows the far-reaching impact of a country's development model and strategic choices on its destiny.
First of all, the article highlights the ** years of Spain during the period of the "empire on which the sun never sets". Through more than 700 years of the Reconquista, Spain successfully expelled the Moors and established a vast colonial empire. However, the authors point out that Spain's economic difficulties in the face of the influx of wealth were mainly manifested in an over-reliance on colonial plunder and a lack of attention to industrial development. This view reminds us that a nation's economic model is critical to long-term development, and that it is difficult to sustain sustainable prosperity by plundering wealth alone.
Secondly, the article describes in detail how England defeated the Spanish "Armada" with the help of "Royal Corsair". The British strategy consisted of the flexible use of small "fast ships" and clever tactics to successfully evade the attack of the Spanish heavy ships. The article's depiction of Britain's adoption of the capitalist model, its focus on industrial development, and its strategy of weakening Spain through "pirates royale" laid the foundation for Britain's later rise. This historical case shows us that strategic flexibility and rapid economic development are key factors in the success of a country in the face of powerful adversaries.
Finally, the article concludes with an incisive conclusion, emphasizing that Spain's defeat was not a direct result of Britain becoming the new hegemon in World War I, but was due to the inherent flaws of Spain's own development model. Britain insisted on putting its own economic interests first and became the representative country of capitalism, while Spain fell into traditional and conservative thinking, which eventually led to its decline. This conclusion is a thought-provoking reminder that all countries need to maintain an open and flexible attitude in development, constantly adjust their economic strategies, and adapt to the development trend of the times.
Overall, this review** presents readers with a fascinating story about national development and strategic choices, with profound historical analysis and clear discourse. By reviewing history, we can better understand the rise and fall of nations and thus better respond to the challenges facing society today.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!