Xiaozong of the Southern Song Dynasty, one day in February of the third year of the Gandao (1167), Chen Junqing, the governor of the political council, unexpectedly obtained a confidential message about the transfer of senior **. The news revealed that the confidential information of the ** transfer was leaked ahead of schedule, involving the emperor's cronies, causing a political turmoil. Chen Junqing decided to use this information to launch a plan, with the goal of eliminating the "two thieves" who had been living by Xiaozong's side for a long time.
The Southern Song Dynasty favored the villain, and the close ministers framed the famous ministers, and the situation was met.
In the thirty-second year of Shaoxing (1162), Song Gaozong was enthroned and succeeded by Song Xiaozong. Although Yuan Xiangtuo, who revised the "History of the Song Dynasty", had a high evaluation of Xiaozong, Xiaozong was still following in the footsteps of Gaozong in favoring his close ministers and appointing He Xing. The Long and Zeng incidents have become classic cases.
The close ministers are arrogant and unscrupulous, and they hold the power of the court.
After Xiaozong succeeded to the throne, the two originally low-level **, Long Dayuan and Zeng Mao, were favored by Xiaozong because of their appearance. Xiaozong quickly promoted these two people, appointed Long Dayuan as the deputy capital of the Privy Council, and Zeng Mo as the director of the Imperial City except for the imperial equipment. These two positions were small, but they held important imperial court functions.
The courtiers strongly objected, questioning the appointment of petty officials who did not participate in the imperial examinations.
The ministers of the imperial court strongly objected to the appointment of these two low-ranking ** such important posts who did not participate in the imperial examinations. Counseling the doctor Liu Du led the first words, believing that "it is not possible to treat villains without moderation", and suggested that Xiaozong consider it carefully.
Xiaozong stubbornly did not listen to advice and was bent on protecting his cronies.
However, Hyojong ignored the courtiers' objections and insisted on the original appointment. Long and Zeng were even more arrogant and arrogant under the ** of power, and even showed off their influence around the emperor through gossip in the palace.
The palace turmoil escalated, and the courtiers jointly opposed it.
In order to stop the excesses of these two villains, the courtiers opposed it one after another. Liu Du and others strongly accused Long and Zeng of being "frivolous and superficial, relying on grace", and demanded that Xiaozong remove these two villains who did not have the right to do so.
Xiaozong compromised and temporarily revoked the order, and the courtiers felt a little happy.
Faced with strong opposition from the courtiers, Xiaozong had to temporarily revoke his original appointment. The courtiers felt a glea, thinking that the matter was over.
The storm rose again, Xiaozong appointed his cronies again, and the courtiers were indignant.
However, only eight days later, Xiaozong suddenly changed his degree, reappointed Long and Zeng, and demoted and deposed the opposing courtiers. This move caused righteous indignation among the courtiers, and the situation was once again tense.
Lu You supported the famous ministers, and was belittled, and there was an uproar.
The famous writer Lu You took the lead in standing up and supporting Liu Du, who was demoted, and accused Long and Zeng of "recruiting power and planting the party". However, Lu You was belittled instead, and there was an uproar.
Zeng returned to Beijing after completing his post, and the opposition of the courtiers rose again.
Zeng returned to Beijing to report on his work, and the courtiers once again spoke out against it. Xiaozong originally wanted to recall Zeng Mao, but he gave up due to the opposition of the courtiers, and the situation reached an impasse.
Chen Junqing learned the inside story and exposed the betrayal of his cronies, and the court made waves again.
In July of the third year of the Gandao (1169), Chen Junqing learned that Zeng Mo was about to return to Beijing. He quickly exposed the inside story of the leak of the news, pushing his cronies Long and Zeng to the forefront.
Xiaozong was furious and ordered the expulsion of Long and Zeng, and the courtiers cheered.
When Xiaozong learned the truth about his cronies' betrayal, he was furious and immediately ordered the expulsion of Long Dayuan and Zeng Mao. The courtiers cheered, and it seemed that the turmoil had subsided.
Zeng Mo was degraded, Long Dayuan died of despair, and the court was in turmoil.
However, after Zeng Mo returned to Beijing after completing his foreign post, he was degraded. Long Dayuan was discriminated against in Jiankang and soon died of despair. The court was plunged into even greater turmoil.
Xiaozong hesitated, and the courtiers strongly objected.
Xiaozong hesitated to denigrate Zeng, and the courtiers strongly opposed it. For a time, the contradictions inside and outside the imperial court intensified, and the situation was complicated.
The favor of the villain caused chaos, and the court of the Southern Song Dynasty was turbulent.
The court of the Southern Song Dynasty fell into turmoil because of the favor of villains, and the contradictions between courtiers and emperors intensified. The situation is difficult to calm down, and the storm is rising again, where will the Southern Song Dynasty go?
This article shows in detail the political turmoil in the court of the Southern Song Dynasty, revealing the open and secret struggle between power and conspiracy, as well as the intensification of contradictions inside and outside the court. The whole story is based on the contradiction between filial piety and cronies, presenting a wonderful picture of court intrigues.
First of all, the article vividly depicts the political ecology of the court in the Southern Song Dynasty through vivid textual description. After Xiaozong succeeded to the throne, his cronies Long Dayuan and Zeng Mo were overly arrogant because of their favor, and frequently violated the discipline of the court, causing a wave of opposition from the courtiers. This kind of behavior of favoring villains and ignoring the government has caused dissatisfaction in the society.
Secondly, the article skillfully depicts the opposition of the courtiers to the appointment of Long and Zeng by Xiaozong. From Liu Du's advances, to Lu You's support, to the joint names of the courtiers, a picture of opposing favored villains and maintaining the stability of the court has been formed. This kind of opposition shows the courtiers' sense of responsibility for national politics and their responsibility to worry about the country and the people.
Then, by exposing the plot of the leakage of internal affairs news, the article introduces the role of Chen Junqing, the governor of the political affairs. Chen Junqing's acumen and decisiveness gradually surfaced the conspiracy of his cronies, providing an opportunity for the incorruptibility of the imperial court. This plot shows the resourcefulness and intrigue of the political struggle, which makes the whole story even more engaging.
Finally, the article ends with the opposition of the courtiers, the ambivalence of Xiaozong, and the different endings of Long Dayuan and Zeng Mao, forming a gripping climax. This ending not only reflects the changes inside and outside the court of the Southern Song Dynasty, but also leaves a kind of suspense and thinking in the hearts of readers.
Overall, the essay vividly illustrates the complexity of court intrigue and struggle through a detailed description of the political turmoil in the Southern Song court. There are many characters, rich plots, and emotional ups and downs in the text, which immerse the reader in it and appreciate the twists and turns and bitterness of ancient court politics.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!