Understand a review data released by Che Di, which "provoked public anger" overnight?
According to the released data, about 20 models of hybrid models participated in the test of the pure electric range achievement rate in severe cold conditions. Among them, BYD looked up to 8508 ranks first in the endurance achievement rate. The M7 extended range version jointly created by Huawei and Thalys is 316, ranking first from the bottom.
Subsequently, Yu Chengdong questioned the test level of the car emperor. In addition to Yu Chengdong, domestic auto giants ATO, Great Wall Motors and Geely Automobile have all stood up to express doubts. Even Tesla,also stood up and issued a "counterattack": tests carried out outside of industry standards will mislead the public.
Tesla will stand up and speak at this time, because Tesla has frequently encountered the manipulation of reviews (not the third-party platform in this article) in the past, as well as the phenomenon of smearing. Therefore, they took the opportunity to issue a counterattack against these assessment agencies.
It can be said that this time everyone is not very satisfied with the test results of Chedi, probably except for BYD, which ranks first. So, there have been so many evaluations and a lot of moisture, why didn't there be such a big storm in the past, but this car evaluation led to so many car companies "besieged"?
It is obvious that the test of Chedi this time directly "attacked" the interests of more car companies. As the official media said, the test results of third parties will directly affect consumers' purchase behavior. Especially for a platform with a large number of fans like Chedi, in the context that they have established a good foundation of trust with users, the impact of this data test is not small.
It would be enough to say that the testing process was strictly in accordance with the relevant national testing process, and a more authoritative conclusion was reached. But the key is that the executives of several major car companies have found loopholes in the test, and they are definitely unwilling to let go of the "siege" of this evaluation result when their interests may be seriously damaged. To put it bluntly - it hurts everyone's interests, and they don't want to be happy.
What's more, if the test results are allowed to circulate this time, even if they use their strength to break the test results, what about the next time?What about the next time?To a certain extent, these car companies are also taking this opportunity to avoid future troubles for their future roads, and let third-party testing agencies know that these car companies are not easy to mess with.
And the "siege" of many car companies means that the test moisture of the car emperor is really big?
Personally, I don't have such a viewAfter the second test of the car emperor directly attracted the attention effect, the effect of these car companies that questioned the car emperor was still not very ideal. Whether the third-party test platform is holding on to the flaws, or whether the car companies are unwilling to admit their own shortcomings, it depends on everyone's own ideas. However, there is one point that cannot be ignored, if the third-party test platform is dominant, even if there is no moisture in the current test, it does not necessarily mean that there will be no moisture in the long-term future.
As long as the state can do a good job in supervising third-party testing, then with the emergence of a number of third-party evaluation agencies, it may be able to put an end to the current turmoil.
In the end, there is no judgment on who is right and who is wrong. I only saw two points: if you want to test this bowl of rice steadily, you must ensure fairness. Second, as a platform that lives on the advertising of car companies, it is better not to offend the "car circle" all of a sudden. In other words, if this incident causes them to dare not offend, then there is still any future evaluation data?That's what we should think about behind this incident.
In this regard, do you think that in this turmoil, is it the car companies that are unwilling to admit it, or the test results of the platform are watery?Feel free to leave a comment, like and share this!