During the Three Kingdoms period, there was a famous saying in Jingzhou: "Wolong and phoenix chicks can win the world!"These words are inherited from Mr. Shuijing, in which Wolong is the later Shu Han Prime Minister Zhuge Liang, and Feng Xiao is the hero of the attack on Xichuan Pang Tong.
Pang Tong advocated occupying Yizhou, relying on its fertile land and vast territory, recuperating and recuperating, and then trying to conquer the world. Zhuge Liang suggested that Liu Bei first occupy Jingzhou, and then Tuyizhou, and finally when the world changes, unite the Jingzhou army and the Yizhou army to clean up the mess.
The strategies of the two military divisions are different, judging from the results of Guan Yu's loss of Jingzhou and his death, Pang Tong's strategy is superior. Although Guan Yu was a famous general in Sichuan and Shu, he acted arrogantly with the support of Liu Bei, and finally died in frustration, which made Zhuge Liang's "Longzhong Pair" difficult to implement, and Liu Bei suffered heavy losses.
Liu Bei led Pang Tong, Wei Yan, and Huang Zhong into Sichuan and chose Pang Tong's strategy. This attack proved that Pang Tong was clever, Liu Bei led tens of thousands of troops, plus Pang Tong, Huang Zhong, Wei Yan and other generals, easily captured Fucheng, showing the actual effect of Pang ** strategy.
When Liu Bei entered Sichuan, Pang Tong gave Wei Yan three hints in a row, but Wei Yan failed to comprehend. First of all, Pang Tong proposed to kill the upper echelons of Chengdu directly, but Wei Yan almost died with the cooperation of Huang Zhong and Pang Tong. Secondly, Pang Tong suggested taking Yang Huai and Gao Pei's generals and military supplies, but Wei Yan chose to take risks with greed, and the result was a fiasco. In the end, Pang Tong suggested that the troops be collected and returned to Jingzhou, but Wei Yan still did not understand Pang Tong's strategic intentions.
In the strategy of Yucheng, Pang Tong gave Wei Yan hints three times, but was misunderstood by Wei Yan. First of all, Pang Tong bluntly said that Liu Bei was not a benevolent and righteous king, and he took pleasure in killing, hinting at Liu Bei's true character. Secondly, Pang Tong advised Wei Yan not to fight for merit and keep his duty, but Wei Yan almost died because of this. In the end, Pang Tong used his life to prove that Liu Bei was mercenary and took himself as a victim of the capture of Yizhou.
Pang Tong's resourcefulness left a deep mark on history, but Wei Yan paid a heavy price for ignoring Pang Tong's three hints. Liu Bei, under the guidance of Pang Tong, succeeded in capturing Sichuan, but Wei Yan's misjudgment caused him to not only lose his reputation, but also endanger his own life.
Pang Tong's strategic wisdom and sensitivity to the situation made him leave a brilliant mark in history. However, Wei Yan failed to comprehend Pang Tong's resourcefulness, and finally became a painful victim of Pang Tong's strategy, adding a tragic story to history.
This article deeply analyzes the different strategic views of Pang Tong and Zhuge Liang during the Three Kingdoms period, as well as the interaction between Pang Tong and Wei Yan, especially the three consecutive hints that Pang Tong gave to Wei Yan during Liu Bei's entry into Sichuan. This in-depth reading of historical events allows the reader to better understand the political and military situation of the Three Kingdoms period.
First of all, through the comparison of Pang Tong and Zhuge Liang's strategic thoughts, the article highlights Pang Tong's foresight in occupying Yizhou. Pang Tong advocated the occupation of Yizhou, giving full play to its advantages of fertile land and vast territory, and seeking the world by recuperating and recuperating and fighting fiercely. In contrast, Zhuge Liang advocated occupying Jingzhou first, then trying to benefit Zhouzhou, and finally sending troops to clean up the mess when the world changed. This strategic difference was confirmed in the incident of Guan Yu's loss of Jingzhou, which showed the practical feasibility of Pang **luo.
Secondly, through the case of Liu Bei leading Pang Tong, Wei Yan, and Huang Zhong into Sichuan, the article emphasizes Pang Tong's resourcefulness and strategic cleverness. Liu Bei chose Pang Tong's strategic plan and successfully captured Fucheng, showing the actual effect of Pang **'s strategy. However, Wei Yan failed to understand Pang Tong's strategic intentions in the process, resulting in a series of defeats and losses. This contrast makes the reader more deeply aware of Pang Tong's excellence in war strategy, as well as Wei Yan's ignorance in the process.
Finally, the article reveals Pang Tong's keen insight and cognition of Liu Bei's true character through Pang Tong's three consecutive hints to Wei Yan in the strategy of Luocheng. Pang Tong bluntly said that Liu Bei was not a benevolent and righteous king, and he took pleasure in killing, which provided an important warning for Wei Yan. However, Wei Yan failed to comprehend Pang Tong's hints, and paid a heavy price in the strategy of Yucheng, becoming a victim of Pang Tong's strategy. This revelation makes the article more dramatic and historical.
Overall, through an in-depth analysis of the historical events of the Three Kingdoms period, this article skillfully demonstrates Pang Tong's resourcefulness and Wei Yan's misjudgment, enriching our understanding of this period of history. Through vivid descriptions and detailed examples, the article makes it easier for readers to immerse themselves in it and appreciate the different fates of Pang Tong and Wei Yan in the long river of history.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!