With the development of society, people's pursuit of the spiritual level is becoming more and more urgent. In the past, due to the limitations of video conferencing, we could only obtain information through books and newspapers. However, the advent of the 5G era has made ** the norm, driving more and more TV dramas to choose to remake with classical masterpieces as scripts.
In the well-known "Water Margin", we admire the righteousness of the 108 heroes of Liangshan and admire the heroic righteousness of Tianxingdao. However, the Songjiang Fangla Uprising in real history had a completely different direction.
The false Songjiang uprising in the Water Margin.
The Songjiang Uprising described in the Water Margin was centered on Liangshanbo, gathering heroes from all over the world to form 108 heroes and give them titles. They defeated Tong Guan's heavenly soldiers and generals, captured Gao Yu alive, and finally Ye Luo returned to his roots to accept Zhao'an, pacified Tianhu Wang Qing, fought a bloody battle against Fang La, suffered heavy losses, and finally Song Jiang committed suicide by drinking poisonous wine.
However, the real Songjiang Uprising is very different from the depiction in **. The uprising of Song Jiang was based on the premise that the government was mediocre in the last years of the Song Dynasty, the traitorous ministers were in power, and the people were not able to make a living. The people are facing livelihood difficulties, it is difficult to cope with the heavy taxes of the imperial court, and they are even more oppressed by the best officials. Thirty-eight fishermen revolted in Liangshanbo, but due to their weak forces, they could only engage in guerrilla warfare and barely survive.
Although Song Jiang captured some cities, the scale and threat were insignificant compared to Fang La's uprising. In the end, he was exterminated by the local ** officers and soldiers, Song Jiang was also captured and killed, and the small-scale uprising was quelled.
The Fangla uprising that united the people.
Fang Layuan was a servant of a landlord's family in Muzhou, and he deeply felt that the government was corrupt and the people were struggling to make a living. He used Mingjiao to organize the masses, launch an uprising, expose the taxation and servitude of the landlord ruling class and the feudal system, and call on the people to unite and inspire consciousness. The rebel army grew rapidly, from a few hundred men to nearly 100,000 troops.
Under the leadership of Fang La, the rebel army broke through 52 counties in six prefectures, and the flames of revolution spread to the southern provinces and cities. However, this caused panic among Song Huizong, who ordered the surrender of Zhao'an and sent an army of 100,000 to brutally suppress it. The rebels were defeated in battle, and Fang La was finally captured and died heroically in Tokyo.
A comparative analysis of the two uprisings.
Compared with the two uprisings, Song Jiang's uprising was more like a small-scale guerrilla sneak attack to meet the basic needs of life. In contrast, Fang La's uprising was larger in scale and achieved more complete and significant results. Fang La successfully attracted the attention of the imperial court, triggered social turmoil and change, and widely called on the toiling people to participate in it.
The reason why the Water Margin did not use Fang La as a prototype was because Fang La's uprising posed a mortal threat to the rule of the Song Dynasty and was too risky. On the contrary, by taking Song Jiang as the protagonist and accepting Zhao'an to go to Fangla, it was more in line with the political background of the times and reduced the risk of the work.
In the feudal society of traditional China, only the class struggle and insurrectionary wars of the peasants could truly promote historical change and development. ** The chairman once pointed out that "Water Margin" has made people aware of the shame of the capitulation faction through the negative teaching materials of surrender. By comparing the two uprisings, we can better understand the truth of history and see the darkness of feudal society.
In this process, we must recognize that the publication of historical classics was influenced by the government of the time. The reason why the Water Margin did not use Fang La as a prototype was because Fang La's uprising was revolutionary and dealt a fatal blow to the rule of the Song Dynasty. Therefore, when we are in history, we should examine the authenticity of the documents and possible political interference.
Through comparison and analysis, we have a deeper understanding of the uprisings of Song Jiang and Fang La. The difference between the two lies not only in the motivation and scale, but also in the impact on history and social change. Such historical comparisons allow us to see more clearly the shortcomings of feudal society and the role of the peasant class struggle in promoting the development of history.
The article "The True Historical Comparison of the Song Jiang and Fangla Uprisings" profoundly reveals the gap between literary works and real history, which is thought-provoking. Through the comparative analysis of the uprisings of Song Jiang and Fang La in "Water Margin", this paper shows the differences between the real uprisings of these two historical figures, and also reflects the possible political influence of historical documents in shaping the image of heroes.
First of all, the article reveals the falsity of the Songjiang uprising in "Water Margin" through vivid descriptions. Song Jiang in ** is depicted as a hero, and the 108 heroes of Liangshanbo have become masterpieces. However, the article points out that the Song Jiang uprising in real history was limited in scale and was only a small-scale guerrilla operation based on livelihood issues. This contrast highlights the exaggerated discrepancy between literature and real history, and provokes reflection on the truth of history.
Secondly, through the depiction of the Vara uprising, the article shows the real contribution of this historical figure in real history. The Fangla uprising stemmed from the antipathy to feudal ** rule, and by organizing the peasant masses to resist, it exposed the ** of the landlord ruling class. The scale and far-reaching impact of this uprising are in stark contrast to the Songjiang Uprising in **, which makes people deeply shocked by the historical truth.
The article also provides an in-depth analysis of the fundamental differences between the two uprisings, emphasizing that Fang La's uprising was more revolutionary in nature and posed a mortal threat to Song rule. The reason why "Water Margin" is not based on Fang La, the article believes that it is because Fang La's uprising is too risky and does not conform to the political atmosphere at that time. This allows readers to look at historical events more rationally while thinking about the relationship between literary works and history.
Finally, the article points out that the publication of historical documents was influenced by the government of the time, and emphasizes that literary creation was restricted by political factors. Through the quotation of Chairman ***, the depiction of surrender in "Water Margin" is considered a negative teaching material, and it is intended to express the condemnation of the surrender faction by shaping the image of Song Jiang. This reminds readers to pay attention to the possible political tendencies in historical documents and be cautious about the shaping of historical figures.
Overall, the essay both reveals the difference between literary works and real history, and provokes reflection on historical truth. By comparing the two historical figures, Song Jiang and Fang La, readers can understand the complexity and diversity of history more comprehensively. Such a ** not only helps to deepen the understanding of history, but also reminds people to maintain sensitivity to historical truth when receiving literary works.
Disclaimer: The above content information is ** on the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual. The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information. The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
If the content of the article involves the content of the work, copyright**, infringement, rumors or other issues, please contact us to delete it. Finally, if you have any different thoughts about this event, please leave a message in the comment area to discuss!