We must understand that the current pension pressure is mainly in two aspects: one is the acceleration of population aging, and the other is the extension of life expectancy. Both of these factors have led to a sharp increase in the demand for pension resources, while our supply capacity is relatively limited. This begs the question: should we seek a way to reallocate these limited resources?
1. The logic of abolishing pensions.
Against this backdrop, the abolition of everyone's pensions seems like a thought-provoking solution. The logic behind this is that it tries to redistribute the pension resources that originally belonged to a part of the population to all those who need it in a fair way. However, is this practice reasonable?Should we risk sacrificing the interests of some to relieve the pressure on others?
2. The negative impact of the abolition of pensions.
We must recognise that pensions are essential for many older people to maintain their basic needs**. The abolition of pensions will undoubtedly have a serious impact on their lives and may lead them to fall into poverty. In addition, this practice can also spark social discontent and undermine social harmony.
3. Professional advice on coping with pension pressure.
How do we deal with this pressure?I think we need to think about it from multiple angles. First of all, we need to increase investment in pension services, including improving pension benefits, optimizing pension service facilities, and improving the treatment of nursing staff. Secondly, we need to encourage and guide more people to participate in elderly care services, including extending the working years and providing flexible working hours. Finally, we also need to encourage and support individuals to make good retirement savings, including investment, savings and insurance.
Fourth, the social problems that may be caused by the abolition of retirement pensions.
If we really choose to abolish pensions, then we may face a series of social problems. First, it could lead to an increase in social injustice. Some people may fall into poverty because they do not have access to adequate pensions, which will undoubtedly exacerbate inequality in society. Second, it could lead to large-scale ** and conflict. Since the abolition of pensions means depriving some people of their vested interests, it can lead to large-scale ** and conflict.
This can also lead to brain drain and talent shortages. For some, retirement means they can pursue their hobbies or continue their education to enrich their lives. If the pension is cancelled, they may choose to continue working rather than stop and enjoy their old age. This can lead to a brain drain to other countries or regions, exacerbating our talent shortage.
Removing everyone's pension is not an ideal solution. It can trigger a series of social problems, including exacerbating social injustice, triggering ** and conflict, leading to brain drain and talent shortages, etc. Therefore, we need to find more realistic, fair and humane ways to deal with the pressure of retirement. This may require us to re-examine our social systems, policies, and cultures to find a solution that meets the needs of older persons while safeguarding the interests of all.
How do you think we should better cope with the pressure of retirement?Should everyone's pension be abolished?Please leave your views and suggestions in the comment area, and let us make suggestions for the future pension problem together!