In withTianjin men's basketball teamof the game,Guangdong men's basketball teamWon 116-111 to get revenge and make it an eight-game winning streak. The game was very tight, with the scores of the two sides deadlocked, and there was no obvious point difference. As a result, every decision given by the referee at a critical moment in the game has a significant impact on the outcome of the game. At the same time,cbaThe professionalism of the referees has also become the focus of attention. This game is not an isolated case, and controversial decisions by referees in other matches have also been widely discussed. For example, the Shandong team andQingdao men's basketball teamThere were also some outrageous penalties. In light of this situation, the requirements for referees have become more stringent.
Guangdong men's basketball team's victory allowed them to get revenge and make it 8 straight wins, which was a huge milestone for the team. In this intense match, both sides put in a huge effort, which made the outcome of the match destined not to be decided easily. However, the referee repeatedly made controversial decisions during the game, which caused dissatisfaction and doubts among the fans. At this crucial moment, every decision made by the referee became the focus of the game, even more than the efforts of the players. This scene is also highlighted againcbaThe professionalism of the referees is a matter of their ability to give unsatisfactory decisions at times. Compared to this game, similar situations have occurred in other games, which has attracted widespread attention from ** and fans, which also shows that the concern about the quality of referees is not an isolated case.
The biggest controversy of the match was concentrated in the final momentsJamesRightZhou Qion the penalty. This time the penalty directly decided the outcome of the game:Zhou QiNot only successful shotsThree-point shot, and the team was also judged to have committed a foul, causing controversy. After the game, there was a lot of discussion about the decisionSocial**There is a lot of buzz on it. It can be clearly seen through the slow-motion replay that the referee made a mistake becauseZhou QiIt was obvious that he had pushed the man first before grabbing the rebound. According to the rules, the correct penalty should be:Zhou QiGrab the rebound and foul and give the ball to the Tianjin team, not rightJamesFoul awarded. Beijing mediaYongfang once again posted a post mocking the penalty, and mentioned the next game against the Guangdong team, saying that it is necessary to pay attention to the aspects affected by this penalty. There were also many controversial penalties in the Beijing-Guangdong battle, and after the Beijing team lostBeijing mediaThey published several mocking articles against the referee and the Guangdong team. RightGuangdong men's basketball teamThe hostile Liaoning ** also published an article with insinuations, ironizing that the result of the game was decided by the referee.
Zhou QiA controversial decision at the end of the game was in the spotlight. This decision directly affected the outcome of the match, because:Zhou QiNot only did it hit the targetThree-point shot, but also caused a technical foul. After the game, the penalty sparked a wide discussion and became a hot topic. It is clear from the analysis of slow-motion replays that the referee misjudged the foul. In fact,Zhou QiIt was obviously after pushing the man to grab the rebound, and the referee should have awarded itZhou Qifoul, give the ball to the Tianjin team, not rightJamesFoul awarded. Beijing mediaYongfang once again posted a post mocking the penalty, and mentioned the next game against the Guangdong team, saying that everyone needs to pay attention to the impact of this penalty. In the last Beijing-Guangdong battle, there were a lot of controversial decisions by the referees, plus the Beijing team lostBeijing mediaDiscouraged, they published several articles in a row mocking the referee and the Guangdong team. Liaoning ** people also carry the rightGuangdong men's basketball teamThe hostility published a sarcastic article saying that the result of the match was decided by the referee.
Beijing mediaYong Fangfang ridiculed the referee and the Guangdong team in his post. Beijing mediapointed out the controversial penalty of the referee in the Beijing-Guangdong War, and saidBeijing mediaI was so angry after losing the last game, so I had a good chance to play against Guangdong in the next gameBeijing mediaDefinitely won't let it go. Liaoning ** people posted a sarcastic article, thinkingGuangdong men's basketball teamThe last four games have been marked by more free throws, while also pointing out that their goal difference has not increased as a result. Liaoning ** people mentioned the efforts of the players in the game, but the final result was decided by the referee. There are other ** people who admit their mistakes, but still complain about the unfair punishment. They felt that the players had to get their hands on the ball to have a controversial chance, but the decision was clearZhou QiGrabbed the rebound. They think that if the referee has not blown the penalty before, they will naturally ignore itJamesof grievances. However, there are also ** people who thinkZhou QiA foul did be committed in this controversial decision, but the referee did not blow the penalty and could not do anything. It was also recognized that the penalty was biased in favor of the Guangdong team, but the biggest problem was the professional ability of the referee. They believe that referees need to be taken seriously because the lack of fairness in refereeing can make our players suffer in the international arena. Therefore, they recommend:cbaConsider bringing in some foreign referees to improve the fairness of the decision.
Beijing mediaYongfang's ridicule of the referee and the Guangdong team in the article has attracted widespread attention. The article points out the controversial penalty situation of the referee in the Beijing-Guangdong War, and emphasizesBeijing mediaAfter losing, they all held their breath, for the next chance to meet the Guangdong teamBeijing mediaDefinitely won't let it go. Liaoning ** people published a satirical article, sayingGuangdong men's basketball teamMore free throws have been made in the last four games, but the average point difference per game has not increased. Their concern is that the players put in a lot of effort on the pitch, but the final outcome is decided by the referee. Others admit their mistakes, but still complain about the unfairness of the punishment. They pointed out that players had to get the ball to have a chance of controversy, but the decision was clearZhou QiGrabbed the rebound. Although the referee didn't blow the penalty before, it naturally didn't pay attention to itJamesof grievances. However, there are also ** thinksZhou QiThere was indeed a foul in this controversial decision, but the referee did not blow the penalty and was helpless. It is widely acknowledged that the penalty was biased in favor of the Guangdong team, but the biggest problem is the professionalism of the referees. They believe that the referee's skill level is not enough, and his amateurish blowing style is the most important concern. And the Guangdong team did not force the referee to favor their intentions. Some believecbaConsideration should be given to bringing in some foreign referees to improve the fairness of the decision, at least they can be impartial and not biased towards either side.
ForcbaOn the issue of the level of referees, some people put forward a suggestion to invite foreign referees to preside over the game. They believe that foreign referees can provide more impartial decisions without favoring any one side. This will also help to resolve referee disputes and improve the fairness of the game. Because the current referee's unprofessional and unfair judgment has been concededcbaPlayers suffer a lot on the international stage. Therefore,Yao MingAscbaThe Chair could consider this suggestion for the purpose of improvingcbaThe impartiality and professionalism of the competition.
JustcbaOn the issue of the professional level of referees, some people have put forward a suggestion to invite foreign referees to enforce the law. They believe that foreign referees can provide more fair decisions and will not favor any side. This will also help to resolve referee disputes and improve the fairness of the game. Due to the unprofessionalism and bias of the current referees, resulting incbaPlayers suffer a lot on the international stage. Therefore, ascbaChairman'sYao MingThis suggestion can be considered to elevatecbaThe impartiality and professionalism of the competition.
Guangdong men's basketball teamDefeated 116-111 on the roadTianjin men's basketball team, achieved a wave of 8 consecutive victories, and successfully took revenge. However, the referee's controversial decision during the match raised eyebrows. EspeciallyZhou QiControversial last-minute decisions were considered key to deciding the outcome of the match, which sparked widespread discussion. **There are voices criticizing the lack of refereeing in the comments, and there are also concerns about the fairness of the referee's decision. It was suggestedcbaConsider using a foreign referee to improve the fairness of the decision. Relatively speaking, the Guangdong team did not forcibly interfere with the referee in this game, but the unfairness of the referee's punishment caused a lot of accusations. For such a case,cbaChairmanYao MingConsideration may be given to treating it cautiously and taking measures to improve the professionalism and impartiality of referees to further enhance itcbaThe quality and competitiveness of the competition.