Public officials are forbidden to build their own houses, and there is no collective dividend for cultivated land!Specialists are no longer farmersWhat the hell is going on?
In recent years, with the acceleration of urbanization, more and more rural people have poured into cities and become urban residents. However, this change also comes with some problems. Some public officials find that they are unable to own their own homes in rural areas, nor are they able to enjoy benefits such as arable land and collective dividends. This has left a lot of people confused and puzzled. Experts say these people are no longer farmers, so what's going on?
We need to be clear that there is a legal distinction between a public official and a farmer. Public officials refer to those who hold positions in ** organs, enterprises and institutions, etc., while farmers refer to those engaged in agricultural production. In our laws and policies, there are clear provisions on the identity and status of public officials.
For public officials, their work and lifestyle are very different from those of farmers. They usually work and live in cities, and are not familiar with the land and resources in rural areas, and do not have the corresponding management and management capabilities. Therefore, for public officials, the prohibition of welfare measures such as self-built houses, cultivated land, and collective dividends is to ensure the rational use and distribution of rural resources and avoid the waste and abuse of resources.
Why do experts believe that public officials are no longer farmers?This is because the change in the rural population is an objective fact in the process of urbanization. With the migration of rural population to urban areas, rural land and resources are also facing certain changes and adjustments. This means that the allocation and utilization of rural resources need to be managed and operated in a more scientific and rational way to ensure the sustainable development of rural areas.
Some public officials do not understand these policies and measures, believing that their identity and status are restricted and discriminated against. This view is incorrect. We should realize that the process of urbanization is an inevitable trend, and the change of rural population is also an objective fact. We should respect this change and actively explore rural development models and management methods that adapt to the process of urbanization.
For those farmers who remain in the rural areas, we should pay more attention to their livelihood and development. The countryside is a place of great potential that deserves more attention and support. ** The society should adopt more scientific and reasonable policies and measures to protect the basic livelihood and development rights of farmers, and at the same time promote the sustainable development of rural areas.
With regard to the issue of rural reform and development, the experts also put forward many suggestions and reflections. First of all, it is necessary to strengthen the construction of rural infrastructure and improve the productivity and quality of life in rural areas. Second, it is necessary to increase investment in education, medical care, and culture in rural areas to improve the living standards and quality of peasants. In addition, it is also necessary to encourage and support peasants in developing industries with special characteristics and in modernizing agriculture, so as to enhance the efficiency and competitiveness of agriculture. At the same time, the society should also strengthen the management and supervision of rural land and resources to protect the legitimate rights and interests of farmers.
To sum up, the prohibition of self-built houses, cultivated land, collective dividends and other welfare measures by public officials is to ensure the rational use and distribution of rural resources and avoid waste and abuse of resources. Experts believe that public officials have ceased to be peasants because of the changes in the rural population in the process of urbanization is an objective fact. For those farmers who remain in rural areas, we should pay more attention to and support them, and adopt scientific and rational policies and measures to promote sustainable rural development.